Joe Miner Posted August 12, 2019 Posted August 12, 2019 10 minutes ago, B-Man said: This whole thing was caused by the ***** Lorax? 1
row_33 Posted August 12, 2019 Posted August 12, 2019 Do people actually sit there and spend 20 minutes on a close read of a NYT article?
Taro T Posted August 12, 2019 Posted August 12, 2019 11 minutes ago, Joe Miner said: This whole thing was caused by the ***** Lorax? Theodore Geisel's estate must be held accountable!
B-Man Posted August 13, 2019 Posted August 13, 2019 MISSING! TV News Hides the (D) in Epstein-Linked Democrats On Friday, unsealed court documents named former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell and former Clinton cabinet official and ex-New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson as among those who allegedly had sex with an underage victim of Jeffrey Epstein. But while all three evening news broadcasts covered the case, one thing was missing: any hint that those two men are Democrats. It’s a trend that NewsBusters has documented before, as scandal-tarnished Democrats are often detached from their political party, while Republicans in similar circumstances are properly identified. In this case, both Mitchell and Richardson have unequivocally denied the allegations, which were contained in a previously-sealed civil lawsuit brought by Virginia Roberts Guiffre against Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. But that didn’t stop the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts from mentioning them both by name in five different broadcasts since the news broke on Friday — they just didn’t mention that they were both Democrats. 2 1
GG Posted August 13, 2019 Posted August 13, 2019 3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Comments are better than the story
DC Tom Posted August 13, 2019 Posted August 13, 2019 11 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Did he call someone "Fredo?"
Golden Goat Posted August 13, 2019 Posted August 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... in a state with the third-largest population of African-Americans. ?
njbuff Posted August 14, 2019 Posted August 14, 2019 2 hours ago, Golden Goat said: ... in a state with the third-largest population of African-Americans. ? It looks like she ate most of the population they way Godzilla ate one of King Ghidorah’s heads. ?
Boatdrinks Posted August 14, 2019 Posted August 14, 2019 On 8/11/2019 at 3:29 PM, ALF said: Do you think they are working good enough ? Depends on your definition of “ good enough”. If the desired result is no one is murdered with a gun, that will not happen regardless of any law. The Constitution must be followed, and that is a limitation on what laws can be enacted. In my opinion , they work well enough while not infringing on the rights of the law abiding citizens. I’m not a gun advocate, but I don’t think stricter laws would do much besides make some politicians stick their chests out. Real world impact would be negligible.
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted August 15, 2019 Posted August 15, 2019 On 8/11/2019 at 3:29 PM, ALF said: Do you think they are working good enough ? ...they are just like immigration......work well for those LEGALLY obtaining guns and works well for immigrants LEGALLY attaining citizenship status as in Ellis Island......illegal are culprits in BOTH cases....... 1
Foxx Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 (edited) 6 hours ago, B-Man said: #JOURNALISM: . transcript of that townhall. The New York Times Unites vs. Twitter Edited August 16, 2019 by Foxx 2
Recommended Posts