The Media's Portrayal of Trump and His Presidency

[Tiberius]

Quote

 

Mueller conducted a fair investigation, voters say 72 - 18 percent, including 65 - 25 percent among Republicans.

Voters say 51 - 38 percent that the Mueller Report did not clear President Trump of any wrongdoing.

American voters also say 54 - 42 percent that Trump “attempted to derail or obstruct the investigation into the Russian interference in the 2016 election.” . . .

The news media is an important part of democracy, 66 percent of American voters say, while 23 percent say the media is the "enemy of the people." Republicans say 49 - 36 percent that the news media is the enemy of the people. Every other listed party, gender, education, age and racial group says the media is an important part of democracy.

By 52 - 35 percent, voters trust the media more than Trump to tell the truth about important issues. Republicans trust Trump more than the media 82 - 9 percent. (Idiots) Trusting the media more are Democrats 92 - 2 percent and independent voters 54 - 29 percent. ...

 

https://poll.qu.edu/national/release-detail?ReleaseID=2618

[B-Man]

MSNBC: “Not Clear” Which Side We’re On In Venezuela. . . . . . (Narrator: It’s 100% Clear.)

 

 

 

 

GOOD QUESTION: Why Is Fox News Using Left-Wing Talking Points to Take Cheap Shots at Homeschoolers?

 

 

 

 

Tucker Carlson Goes Off on GOP for Wanting to Intervene in Venezuela.

 

 

 

 

The Liberal Media Keeps Showing Its Total Ignorance Of Religion.

 

Layers and layers of fact-checkers and editors.

 

 

 

.

 

[KD in CA]

On 4/29/2019 at 10:12 AM, B-Man said:

 

 

 

.

 

Still one of the few things that completely baffles me.....how any Jew in this country could vote with the leftists who so clearly hate them.

 

[DC Tom]

7 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Still one of the few things that completely baffles me.....how any Jew in this country could vote with the leftists who so clearly hate them.

 

 

Intersectionality.

[B-Man]

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Intersectionality.

 

 

By happenstance I read this about an hour ago.......................?

 

 

THIS MAKES ME JOYFUL:  My spell check is adamant that “intersectionality” is not a word.  

 

Right you are, Mr. Spell Check.............by Gail Heriot

[row_33]

23 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Still one of the few things that completely baffles me.....how any Jew in this country could vote with the leftists who so clearly hate them.

 

 

i can barely speak for my community let alone others....

 

 

 

[Deranged Rhino]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1124035274571382785

[Koko78]

2 hours ago, row_33 said:

 

didn't they appoint the Asian women to the Board who had 200 Kill Whitey tweets?

 

 

Exactly. That's why the white guy can't get the job. He hasn't advocated for killing Whitey enough.

[Buffalo_Gal]

Well, not exactly Trump-related, but it still fits. The MSM are a buncha hacks. BTW, they were banned on Facebook and IG (IG is owned by Facebook). Since Google basically banned them via youtube and search suppression, they have all been un-personed, and their livelihoods impacted.  Agree with them or not, this is just wrong.
 

The Atlantic article:

Instagram and Facebook Ban Far-Right Extremists
Alex Jones, Infowars, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, Paul Nehlen, and Louis Farrakhan have all been removed from the platforms.
 

I see @Deranged Rhino beat me to it. ? 

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

I see @Deranged Rhino beat me to it. ? 

 

Different source though, so it's all helpful/informative! 

[GG]

20 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Well, not exactly Trump-related, but it still fits. The MSM are a buncha hacks. BTW, they were banned on Facebook and IG (IG is owned by Facebook). Since Google basically banned them via youtube and search suppression, they have all been un-personed, and their livelihoods impacted.  Agree with them or not, this is just wrong.
 

The Atlantic article:

Instagram and Facebook Ban Far-Right Extremists
Alex Jones, Infowars, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson, Laura Loomer, Paul Nehlen, and Louis Farrakhan have all been removed from the platforms.
 

I see @Deranged Rhino beat me to it. ? 

 

I was just about to post that.  Caught my eye too.

[DC Tom]

2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

Well, not exactly Trump-related, but it still fits. The MSM are a buncha hacks. BTW, they were banned on Facebook and IG (IG is owned by Facebook). Since Google basically banned them via youtube and search suppression, they have all been un-personed, and their livelihoods impacted.  Agree with them or not, this is just wrong.

 

Plus...if Facebook is infrastructure that must be secured from tampering for free and fair elections, that argues that this is a First Amendment violation.  And election tampering.

[reddogblitz]

2 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Plus...if Facebook is infrastructure that must be secured from tampering for free and fair elections, that argues that this is a First Amendment violation.  And election tampering.

 

I had an idea today to help the election in regards to social media.  Build a digital wall.

 

6 months before the election until the day after, if you are in America you can only get ads/posts/tweets that originated in the contiguous 48 and Alaska and Hawaii.

[B-Man]

GRADUALLY, THEN SUDDENLY:.................. How Media Narratives Became More Important Than Facts.

 

Sharyl Attkisson:

A case in point: the smear that was promulgated when I left CBS. It was often incorrectly reported that I told CBS management I was quitting due to liberal media bias. That false story turned out to be convenient for both political sides, and largely survives today. It simply wasn’t rooted in fact. And I don’t recall reporters even asking me whether it was true. Once a few articles reported that it was, others simply copied the claim and adopted it as if established fact, eventually without attribution. Now there would be no point in trying to clarify it. After all, Wikipedia says it’s true. No going back from that.

 

Powerful smear groups and certain interests—including some within CBS at the time—started the narrative that I was “conservative,” not because they necessarily believed it, but as a tool to “controversialize” the reporting I was doing that was contrary to powerful interests. The idea is that if I can be portrayed as a partisan, then my reporting can be more easily dismissed.

 

 

Please read the whole thing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHEN DEMOCRATS SPOUT OBVIOUS UNTRUTHS:.................... It doesn’t fit the narrative, so it isn’t newsworthy.

 

 

 

.

 

Edited May 3, 2019 by B-Man

[row_33]

13 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

I had an idea today to help the election in regards to social media.  Build a digital wall.

 

6 months before the election until the day after, if you are in America you can only get ads/posts/tweets that originated in the contiguous 48 and Alaska and Hawaii.

 

who relies on a facebook page to decide their vote?

 

is this the IQ sector lower than those watching The View?

 

 

[B-Man]

LAYERS OF EDITORS AND FACT-CHECKERS: 

 

WaPo, Atlantic Rush To Change Stories After Labeling Louis Farrakhan ‘Far Right’ In Facebook Ban Story.

 

 

.

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

PROJECTION

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

It's a pattern on this story. 

 

The biggest political (and geopolitical) scandal perhaps in the country's history has been ignored for three years because the influencers in the media have chosen a side. Truth isn't their primary concern, covering their own asses is all they care about now.

[Deranged Rhino]

re above -- case in point: 

 

[Buffalo_Gal]

heh