B-Man Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 Quote Wolf Blitzer ✔@wolfblitzer Remember - it’s not just 800,000 federal employees who have been furloughed or are working without pay during this partial government shutdown, it’s also their family members who have been directly impacted. If Democrats are really that concerned about federal employees being paid all they have to do is allocate funding for the wall. It is the simplest and easiest route to put these folks back to work. Otherwise, there are plenty of private sector jobs are open and begging for labor. Employment is BOOMING in Trump’s economy … thank God. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 2 hours ago, B-Man said: If Democrats are really that concerned about federal employees being paid all they have to do is allocate funding for the wall. It is the simplest and easiest route to put these folks back to work. Otherwise, there are plenty of private sector jobs are open and begging for labor. Employment is BOOMING in Trump’s economy … thank God. What would they do without Trump's good economy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 Because it was supposed to stay hidden from the public, we should give her a pass. Just like because Hillary and Podesta's emails were supposed to stay hidden from the people and Congress, we should ignore the contents and focus on shaming those who dare read their contents. The establishment media is not there to protect the people, despite their claims over the past year. The establishment media is there to protect the establishment. ***** logic like the above should alarm every viewer and consumer of media... but it won't. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 22 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Kirstin Powers has been smacked around with a few branches of the ugly stick. Kristen Soltis Anderson and Mary Katherine Ham on the other hand look pretty good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 PATRICK POOLE: Suspects Arrested in Murder of 7-Year-Old Jazmine Barnes, But Questions About Media’s Behavior Remain. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 WHITER THAN A HUFFINGTON POST EDITORIAL BOARD MEETING: . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevbeau Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 14 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Because it was supposed to stay hidden from the public, we should give her a pass. Just like because Hillary and Podesta's emails were supposed to stay hidden from the people and Congress, we should ignore the contents and focus on shaming those who dare read their contents. The establishment media is not there to protect the people, despite their claims over the past year. The establishment media is there to protect the establishment. ***** logic like the above should alarm every viewer and consumer of media... but it won't. Wasn’t Romney’s 47% comment at a private function? And I don’t recall if Hilary’s deplorable snafu was in public or not. Regardless of affiliation, politicians of all people should be well aware that the walls have ears. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Kevbeau said: Wasn’t Romney’s 47% comment at a private function? And I don’t recall if Hilary’s deplorable snafu was in public or not. Regardless of affiliation, politicians of all people should be well aware that the walls have ears. No, Hillary was stupid enough not only to say it, but to knowingly say it in public. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Kevbeau said: Wasn’t Romney’s 47% comment at a private function? And I don’t recall if Hilary’s deplorable snafu was in public or not. Regardless of affiliation, politicians of all people should be well aware that the walls have ears. Romney's 47% comment was also about that number of people already falling under the aegis of existing government programs, hence not people needing to be targeted by new ones. It wasn't a blanket dismissal of half the country as untermenschen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 16 hours ago, B-Man said: WHITER THAN A HUFFINGTON POST EDITORIAL BOARD MEETING: . well, its freaking Iowa no? 91% Caucasian according to latest census...of course her crowd is gunna reflect that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 Just now, plenzmd1 said: well, its freaking Iowa no? 91% Caucasian according to latest census...of course her crowd is gunna reflect that Concentrate. The subject of the post is THE MEDIA...........and the difference with how rallies are covered. Iowa's whiteness doesn't enter into it. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KRC Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 4 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: well, its freaking Iowa no? 91% Caucasian according to latest census...of course her crowd is gunna reflect that Iowa's racist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, B-Man said: Concentrate. The subject of the post is THE MEDIA...........and the difference with how rallies are covered. Iowa's whiteness doesn't enter into it. . But for "them" to say any rally in Iowa lacks racial diversity is like saying the majority of spectators at a Bills game are Bills fans. No chit??? Whats I missing outside some right wing chucklhead crying in his beer again. BTW, like this piece fro the WAPO today..see if it resonates with any yall https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/07/alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-very-bad-defense-her-falsehoods/?utm_term=.d7715ae23f1f Edited January 7, 2019 by plenzmd1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 30 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: But for "them" to say any rally in Iowa lacks racial diversity is like saying the majority of spectators at a Bills game are Bills fans. No chit??? Whats I missing outside some right wing chucklhead crying in his beer again. BTW, like this piece fro the WAPO today..see if it resonates with any yall https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/01/07/alexandria-ocasio-cortezs-very-bad-defense-her-falsehoods/?utm_term=.d7715ae23f1f The basic thesis is "the ends does not justify the means." Which I've been saying here for...how long now? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 The crazed lunatics respond accordingly... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 ... For all those people who have said Trump should just address the nation, they can't stop him... THINK ABOUT WHAT SHE IS SAYING. No other president in history would be denied coverage of an Oval Office address. None. Yet Trump requests time and they have to "decide"? They think you're too stupid to see the actual game being played. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 12 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... For all those people who have said Trump should just address the nation, they can't stop him... THINK ABOUT WHAT SHE IS SAYING. No other president in history would be denied coverage of an Oval Office address. None. Yet Trump requests time and they have to "decide"? They think you're too stupid to see the actual game being played. IF what Maggie is stating is true. She's going to the mat on it on twitter, so maybe it is true, but may not be. Anything to make Trump look weak or to play into the Dems hands by the MSM (BIRM). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 This is a legit conversation now... The solution they're offering is to cut up, editorialize, and make soundbytes of the speech rather than letting the viewers see it for themselves first. That's Orwellian and should alarm everyone regardless of your partisan leanings. They think you're stupid. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 2 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: The crazed lunatics respond accordingly... umm..what if you don't buy the "success" narrative.. does that make you a lunatic? Then call me crazy!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts