Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
CIA Director Destroyed Media Narrative on Trump and Intelligence Briefings

 

During a forum Thursday, CIA Director Mike Pompeo debunked a prevalent myth about Trump’s engagement with intelligence briefings.

 

“How do you describe where the relationship is between the White House and the Intelligence Community?” Pompeo was asked. “It’s fantastic,” he replied to a room full of chuckles. “No, don’t laugh, I mean that.” (video at link)

“I can only give you my observations,” said Pompeo.

“This morning at 10:30, I was in the Oval Office presenting the President his daily brief. I do it nearly every day. When I’m out of town my deputy is there, the team’s there, the Vice President is there almost every day when he’s in the country. They are voracious consumers of the product we’ve developed, they ask really hard questions — I think that’s a sign of a good relationship. I always remind people that when you stop talking, it’s not a good thing.”

 

“The relationship is in my sense
fantastic
(the word that I used) because the President is also completely prepared to hear things that run counter to the hypothesis.”

 

 

 

During the campaign, Trump famously said, “I get it [intel briefs] when I need it”, leading many to believe candidate Trump was disinterested in intel goings on.

Pompeo’s account signals a contrast between candidate Trump and President Trump.

Regardless, if what Pompeo says is true, then that’s another media meme cast to the rubbish bin.

Posted

CIA Director Destroyed Media Narrative on Trump and Intelligence Briefings

 

During a forum Thursday, CIA Director Mike Pompeo debunked a prevalent myth about Trump’s engagement with intelligence briefings.

 

“How do you describe where the relationship is between the White House and the Intelligence Community?” Pompeo was asked. “It’s fantastic,” he replied to a room full of chuckles. “No, don’t laugh, I mean that.” (video at link)

“I can only give you my observations,” said Pompeo.

“This morning at 10:30, I was in the Oval Office presenting the President his daily brief. I do it nearly every day. When I’m out of town my deputy is there, the team’s there, the Vice President is there almost every day when he’s in the country. They are voracious consumers of the product we’ve developed, they ask really hard questions — I think that’s a sign of a good relationship. I always remind people that when you stop talking, it’s not a good thing.”

 

“The relationship is in my sense
fantastic
(the word that I used) because the President is also completely prepared to hear things that run counter to the hypothesis.”

 

 

 

During the campaign, Trump famously said, “I get it [intel briefs] when I need it”, leading many to believe candidate Trump was disinterested in intel goings on.

Pompeo’s account signals a contrast between candidate Trump and President Trump.

Regardless, if what Pompeo says is true, then that’s another media meme cast to the rubbish bin.

 

 

Fake news. Won't see this on Facebook.

Posted

 

 

Eight years of Barry taking his family on separate vacations every other weekend, but NOW the left is counting the money? :lol:

 

Is it any wonder all they're left in charge of are Detroit and the Greater Macungie Utilities Commission.

The right counted all the times BO went golfing and complained about it, like it or not they are allowed to use the same ammo and toss it back.

 

Otherwise who's the hypocrite?

 

Unless you are a fan of your tax money paying the 17 golf trips on in only 100 says. 62 for the calendar year, 250 for this term.

you want to read some scary stuff from fellow republicans?

 

https://twitter.com/RoguePOTUSStaff

 

you'll even see tweets from @theRealDonaldTrump there

Posted

CIA Director Destroyed Media Narrative on Trump and Intelligence Briefings

 

During a forum Thursday, CIA Director Mike Pompeo debunked a prevalent myth about Trump’s engagement with intelligence briefings.

 

“How do you describe where the relationship is between the White House and the Intelligence Community?” Pompeo was asked. “It’s fantastic,” he replied to a room full of chuckles. “No, don’t laugh, I mean that.” (video at link)

 

“I can only give you my observations,” said Pompeo.

 

 

 

“This morning at 10:30, I was in the Oval Office presenting the President his daily brief. I do it nearly every day. When I’m out of town my deputy is there, the team’s there, the Vice President is there almost every day when he’s in the country. They are voracious consumers of the product we’ve developed, they ask really hard questions — I think that’s a sign of a good relationship. I always remind people that when you stop talking, it’s not a good thing.”

 

“The relationship is in my sense fantastic (the word that I used) because the President is also completely prepared to hear things that run counter to the hypothesis.”

 

 

 

During the campaign, Trump famously said, “I get it [intel briefs] when I need it”, leading many to believe candidate Trump was disinterested in intel goings on.

 

Pompeo’s account signals a contrast between candidate Trump and President Trump.

 

Regardless, if what Pompeo says is true, then that’s another media meme cast to the rubbish bin.

 

Oh yes, we all believe Trump isn't ignorant and a bore now. (Rolls eyes)

Posted (edited)

THIS IS CNN: US military defends dropping ‘mother of all bombs’ on ISIS in Afghanistan.



CNN has been running with that headline all day.





But a bunch of terrorists are dead,



a weapons cache destroyed,



a cave tunnel hideout made useless,



no civilians killed,



no American or allied casualties.



What is there to defend ? ?



This was a textbook perfect case of Mission Accomplished.



.


Edited by B-Man
Posted (edited)

:lol:

 

Hiring Anti-Trump Conservative Is Part Of New York Times’ Effort To Expand Opinion

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bret-stephens-new-york-times_us_58f12c80e4b0b9e9848bed3e?aaw&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam

 

 

Seeking diversity............................. NYT editorial page wants anti-Trump opinion from left......... right............ and center.

 

 

Are-You-Paying-Attention-300x336.jpg Liberals just cannot learn from 2016

Edited by B-Man
Posted

:lol:

 

Hiring Anti-Trump Conservative Is Part Of New York Times’ Effort To Expand Opinion

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bret-stephens-new-york-times_us_58f12c80e4b0b9e9848bed3e?aaw&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_axiosam

 

 

Seeking diversity............................. NYT editorial page wants anti-Trump opinion from left......... right............ and center.

 

 

Are-You-Paying-Attention-300x336.jpg Liberals just cannot learn from 2016

 

Posted

That article is hilarious. It's written as some sort of serious coverage, yet, the premise is: "Let's go to the place who voted for Trump the most, and show how it's going to hurt them". That would be like me going to Chicago to investigate the effect of gun control laws. In both cases, you already know what you're going to find, so...why pretend it's "insightful journalism", and that "they are just following the story"? Easy. Because often times leftists aren't even aware how biased they are. This is because: below average IQ leading to an utter lack of self-awareness. Thought must come before compassion. Ask any Buddhist.

 

I wonder if we will see a follow-up story in a year? How about 2? What if Trump does what I think he will, and Wyoming Country prospers? Just a little, perhaps(because NYS, and despite Trump's best efforts)? What if the number of food bank customers is cut in half? What does that do to the budget? What if Health care gets fixed and upstate NY counties don't keep having to pay for downstate Medicaid? NY == only state in the union where this happens...and...conveniently left out of the article?

 

Why? All this talk of county budgets, and no mention of that fact? If Wyoming County was suddenly cut loose from having to subsidize Medicaid, via Federal Law? 2 things: Cuomo and every other down-state D would have a major problem on their hands, of their own creation, and they'd have to solve it...down-state. Wyoming County's budget would rocket to a surplus. They could afford 5 food banks, new snowplows, all sorts of stuff.

 

-------

 

Also hilarious: not a single leftist article goes by where they can't stop talking about Trump's "controversial" tweets. My God does the media hate that Trump gets his message out unfiltered. They hate it that his tweets represent a existential threat to them. Who needs them if you can get what the POTUS thinks, directly on your handheld? The media has to cover it, every time he does it. :lol: So, the conversation, and the premise, always begins at a time and topic of Trump's choosing thus, the media always begins on the defensive.

 

But, most importantly, and this matters far more to these hacks than anything, even their paychecks: Trump tweets mock and then eradicate their unearned power.

 

They expected to have power coming out of college, just handed to them: as the media. Now? They actually have to earn it. As I've said for years, the internet is the best thing that happened to the media, and yeah, there's going to be some growing and some bad reporting on all sides, but, in the long term it's going to remove the 1st Amendment hiding place from the left, by giving that hiding place to everybody.

 

Trump Tweeting is just a side-outcome of a much larger change.

Posted

That article is hilarious. It's written as some sort of serious coverage, yet, the premise is: "Let's go to the place who voted for Trump the most, and show how it's going to hurt them". That would be like me going to Chicago to investigate the effect of gun control laws. In both cases, you already know what you're going to find, so...why pretend it's "insightful journalism", and that "they are just following the story"? Easy. Because often times leftists aren't even aware how biased they are. This is because: below average IQ leading to an utter lack of self-awareness. Thought must come before compassion. Ask any Buddhist.

 

I wonder if we will see a follow-up story in a year? How about 2? What if Trump does what I think he will, and Wyoming Country prospers? Just a little, perhaps(because NYS, and despite Trump's best efforts)? What if the number of food bank customers is cut in half? What does that do to the budget? What if Health care gets fixed and upstate NY counties don't keep having to pay for downstate Medicaid? NY == only state in the union where this happens...and...conveniently left out of the article?

 

Why? All this talk of county budgets, and no mention of that fact? If Wyoming County was suddenly cut loose from having to subsidize Medicaid, via Federal Law? 2 things: Cuomo and every other down-state D would have a major problem on their hands, of their own creation, and they'd have to solve it...down-state. Wyoming County's budget would rocket to a surplus. They could afford 5 food banks, new snowplows, all sorts of stuff.

 

-------

 

Also hilarious: not a single leftist article goes by where they can't stop talking about Trump's "controversial" tweets. My God does the media hate that Trump gets his message out unfiltered. They hate it that his tweets represent a existential threat to them. Who needs them if you can get what the POTUS thinks, directly on your handheld? The media has to cover it, every time he does it. :lol: So, the conversation, and the premise, always begins at a time and topic of Trump's choosing thus, the media always begins on the defensive.

 

But, most importantly, and this matters far more to these hacks than anything, even their paychecks: Trump tweets mock and then eradicate their unearned power.

 

They expected to have power coming out of college, just handed to them: as the media. Now? They actually have to earn it. As I've said for years, the internet is the best thing that happened to the media, and yeah, there's going to be some growing and some bad reporting on all sides, but, in the long term it's going to remove the 1st Amendment hiding place from the left, by giving that hiding place to everybody.

 

Trump Tweeting is just a side-outcome of a much larger change.

 

 

Umm - pretty sure this is incorrect...

 

Any way - if it was so they could afford FIVE NEW FOOD BANKS....what further cementing "liberal policies" like hand outs....huh ...what?

 

No - what is effing hysterical is the Bnews genius of totally spoofing the Trump voter at the hand out-out line - Well Played....

Posted

That article is hilarious. It's written as some sort of serious coverage, yet, the premise is: "Let's go to the place who voted for Trump the most, and show how it's going to hurt them". That would be like me going to Chicago to investigate the effect of gun control laws. In both cases, you already know what you're going to find, so...why pretend it's "insightful journalism", and that "they are just following the story"? Easy. Because often times leftists aren't even aware how biased they are. This is because: below average IQ leading to an utter lack of self-awareness. Thought must come before compassion. Ask any Buddhist.

 

I wonder if we will see a follow-up story in a year? How about 2? What if Trump does what I think he will, and Wyoming Country prospers? Just a little, perhaps(because NYS, and despite Trump's best efforts)? What if the number of food bank customers is cut in half? What does that do to the budget? What if Health care gets fixed and upstate NY counties don't keep having to pay for downstate Medicaid? NY == only state in the union where this happens...and...conveniently left out of the article?

 

Why? All this talk of county budgets, and no mention of that fact? If Wyoming County was suddenly cut loose from having to subsidize Medicaid, via Federal Law? 2 things: Cuomo and every other down-state D would have a major problem on their hands, of their own creation, and they'd have to solve it...down-state. Wyoming County's budget would rocket to a surplus. They could afford 5 food banks, new snowplows, all sorts of stuff.

 

-------

 

Also hilarious: not a single leftist article goes by where they can't stop talking about Trump's "controversial" tweets. My God does the media hate that Trump gets his message out unfiltered. They hate it that his tweets represent a existential threat to them. Who needs them if you can get what the POTUS thinks, directly on your handheld? The media has to cover it, every time he does it. :lol: So, the conversation, and the premise, always begins at a time and topic of Trump's choosing thus, the media always begins on the defensive.

 

But, most importantly, and this matters far more to these hacks than anything, even their paychecks: Trump tweets mock and then eradicate their unearned power.

 

They expected to have power coming out of college, just handed to them: as the media. Now? They actually have to earn it. As I've said for years, the internet is the best thing that happened to the media, and yeah, there's going to be some growing and some bad reporting on all sides, but, in the long term it's going to remove the 1st Amendment hiding place from the left, by giving that hiding place to everybody.

 

Trump Tweeting is just a side-outcome of a much larger change.

 

The print version of this on the front page of the paper has a picture of a guy, says his name, and "loads boxes of free food into his car at the monthly food pantry in Perry"

 

Do you think if this was an inner city food pantry that they would use the same wording?

 

Posted
BREAKING: AP Edits Fresno Killer To Erase Islam Reference, Implicate God

 

For comparison, here is how a local ABC affiliate reported on the story:

 

A gunman who walked through Fresno randomly shooting and killing three men screamed “Allahu Akbar” while being taken into custody, according to authorities.

Fresno Police Chief Jerry Dyer said 39-year-old Kori Ali Muhammad first opened fire on a passenger inside a PG&E truck in the 300 block of North Van Ness Boulevard at about

10:45 a.m.

 

Now, look at how the Associated Press manipulated tweeted it:

 

 

8z9FImcv_normal.pngThe Associated Press

Fresno police say suspect in triple slaying told them he hates white people, shouted "God is great" before killings. http://apne.ws/2o0DdZT

 

 

 

 

Are they serious? Who are they to translate what he actually shouted?

 

He chose his words, that specific phrase, for a reason............... And you know what? So did the AP.

 

 

It’s not even an exact translation, by the way. And why would they do this? Hmm, what a mystery.

 

Changing “allahu akbar” to “god is great” isn’t a matter of Arabic to English.

 

It’s not really a translation at all. It’s a diversion. It’s political correctness. It’s liberal left machination meant to paint religion as guilty while simultaneously easing the burden of guilt on Islam.

 

 

It’s not a news report, in other words. It’s propaganda.

Posted

BRUTAL! Mike Pence Wins Staredown with CNN #VeryFakeNews Reporter (Video)

 

 

From Comments,

 

She didn't ask a question, she made a statement. She was waiting for him to bite on her unspoken questions hoping he'd say something that could be quoted and twisted. But, no, he waited for a real question and didn't start volunteering info.
That's how the media must be handled. They consider him their enemy no matter how politely they speak or how pleasantly they smile.

Posted

Republicans grabbing their holes and crying about The Media remind me of drunk football fans that say the refs are always against them.

 

After all the emails leaked and DNC staffers fired you proclaiming it isn't happening:

 

07-minister.jpg

Posted

 

After all the emails leaked and DNC staffers fired you proclaiming it isn't happening:

 

07-minister.jpg

:lol:

Baghdad Bob, one of the original memes. I had so much fun with with that meme back in the day.

Posted

:lol:

Baghdad Bob, one of the original memes. I had so much fun with with that meme back in the day.

 

Funny, I was just reading about the 3ID's march to Baghdad. Apparently, Baghdad Bob honestly believed what he was saying, because 3ID bypassed all the cities and only sent battalion-sized raids into them (raid leaves, the Iraqi's think "Hey, we fought them off!" not realizing they were just raids and the TF's never intended to stay.) They didn't realize they were getting their asses kicked until the last day of the invasion, when 3ID parked an armored battalion on the front lawn of Saddam's palace.

 

Baghdad Bob was never lying. He believed everything he said. They were just that clueless.

 

Which really makes him the perfect analogy for the DNC chair.

Posted

 

Funny, I was just reading about the 3ID's march to Baghdad. Apparently, Baghdad Bob honestly believed what he was saying, because 3ID bypassed all the cities and only sent battalion-sized raids into them (raid leaves, the Iraqi's think "Hey, we fought them off!" not realizing they were just raids and the TF's never intended to stay.) They didn't realize they were getting their asses kicked until the last day of the invasion, when 3ID parked an armored battalion on the front lawn of Saddam's palace.

 

Baghdad Bob was never lying. He believed everything he said. They were just that clueless.

 

Which really makes him the perfect analogy for the DNC chair.

Sounds a lot more like Trump, actually.

×
×
  • Create New...