Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I'm a news junkie, I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? Apparently not. 1
3rdnlng Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I'm a news junkie and I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? Maybe you were just high every time someone said that 17 different agencies were in agreement with the assessment.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: I'm a news junkie, I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"? For 7 months they touted "All 17 intel agencies agree" with the ICA report released January 6th, 2017... Then issued this retraction... 7 months later. Quote A White House Memo article on Monday about President Trump’s deflections and denials about Russia referred incorrectly to the source of an intelligence assessment that said Russia orchestrated hacking attacks during last year’s presidential election. The assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community. http://archive.is/ndda2#selection-215.0-219.532 Try again.
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Maybe you were just high every time someone said that 17 different agencies were in agreement with the assessment. Really? No one thought to quote him directly referencing an IC "consensus"?
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: For 7 months they touted "All 17 intel agencies agree" with the ICA report released January 6th, 2017... Then issued this retraction... 7 months later. http://archive.is/ndda2#selection-215.0-219.532 Try again. Ok, the Drug Enforcement Agency didn't conclude that and neither did the Coast Guard Agency, but while the report is not entirely on target, it was still correct. The main agencies did make the assessment CIA and FBI among others. So the right wing propaganda machine is splitting hairs and crying bias. They are not being honest. 14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Maybe you were just high every time someone said that 17 different agencies were in agreement with the assessment. Back to being worthless again? You add nothing. Board Troll you are
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: Really? No one thought to quote him directly referencing an IC "consensus"? That required digging through his old stupidity and I didn't have the stomach for it. 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: Ok, the Drug Enforcement Agency didn't conclude that and neither did the Coast Guard Agency, but while the report is not entirely on target, it was still correct. No, your statement is proven to be false. The one where you said you never remembered the Times reporting something they clearly did (for seven months). You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end.
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end. That's why I wasn't going to do the work for him. We all know he was just going to dismiss it out of hand and claim more convenient memory lapses. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That's why I wasn't going to do the work for him. We all know he was just going to dismiss it out of hand and claim more convenient memory lapses. Smarter man than me.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: That required digging through his old stupidity and I didn't have the stomach for it. No, your statement is proven to be false. The one where you said you never remembered the Times reporting something they clearly did (for seven months). You could just admit that - but nah, Gator is gonna Gator til the end. Actually you are wrong. Koko said the Steele dossier, not the intelligence report on Russian interference. You guys are getting your propaganda points mixed up. Which is actually funny
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 Dumbass, the Steele dossier was covered in the ICA. If "all 17 intel agencies" signed off on the ICA like the Times said (and lied about), they also signed off on all the material included in the ICA which the Steele dossier was. It helps to read before you expound. A lesson I still hope you'll learn one day. You're wrong. But that's not breaking news.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Dumbass, the Steele dossier was covered in the ICA. If "all 17 intel agencies" signed off on the ICA like the Times said (and lied about), they also signed off on all the material included in the ICA which the Steele dossier was. It helps to read before you expound. A lesson I still hope you'll learn one day. Not true at all! That is total Bull Sh it and you know it. Try again!
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 I read the ICA. You clearly did not. https://nypost.com/2018/02/22/yet-another-way-obamas-spies-apparently-exploited-the-trump-dossier/
njbuff Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 I bet Sarah Sanders wants to punch April Ryan right in her face.
row_33 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, njbuff said: I bet Sarah Sanders wants to punch April Ryan right in her face. S H-S rules.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I read the ICA. You clearly did not. https://nypost.com/2018/02/22/yet-another-way-obamas-spies-apparently-exploited-the-trump-dossier/ Op ed Really?
njbuff Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 1 minute ago, row_33 said: S H-S rules. I think she enjoys laying the smack down on those “so called” hateful journalists. Spicer ran from it, she hits back.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 Just now, Tiberius said: Op ed Really? I know you won't read the primary source material that makes it clear. I skipped a step for you. The ICA, by Clapper and Brennan's own testimony, was based in part on the Steele dossier and its "merit" (which we now know was never established).
row_33 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 14 minutes ago, njbuff said: I think she enjoys laying the smack down on those “so called” hateful journalists. Spicer ran from it, she hits back. you couldn't design a more perfect and effective person to do this job better than her
B-Man Posted April 13, 2018 Posted April 13, 2018 (edited) This is CNN................................ Quote Brian StelterVerified account @brianstelter FollowFollow @brianstelter A source familiar with the president's thinking tells @GloriaBorger that Trump is "pissed, flailing and upset..." More upset than ever... His anger is "beyond what anyone can imagine." Wow this is as shocking as the last time someone reported this, which was just yesterday and the day before that and the day before that and the day before that and the day before that … . Edited April 13, 2018 by B-Man 2
njbuff Posted April 13, 2018 Posted April 13, 2018 32 minutes ago, B-Man said: This is CNN................................ Wow this is as shocking as the last time someone reported this, which was just yesterday and the day before that and the day before that and the day before that and the day before that … . That little George Costanza is this most disengenuous pricks imaginable in MSM today. And an ultra-annoying voice to boot.
Recommended Posts