Koko78 Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 1 hour ago, ShadyBillsFan said: As an independent it is hilarious how Trump people go from calm to purple-anger in 2 second flat. I think they call them Snowflakes an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or is easily offended and unable to deal with opposing opinions. Yeah, you're about as "independent" as gator...
Warren Zevon Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 So far there are 97 pages of right wing whining about Trump being treated unfair by the media. Boo hoo. Will you dweebs make it 100 pages?
B-Man Posted April 10, 2018 Posted April 10, 2018 2 hours ago, garybusey said: So far there are 97 pages of right wing whining about Trump being treated unfair by the media. Boo hoo. Will you dweebs make it 100 pages? and every third page, one of you simpletons writes the same asinine post (as above) Demonstrable examples of poor journalism and outright bias are given...................and since you certainly cannot refute it , you fall back to the weak-ass "Oh look, they're whining silliness".............. Like night follows day, libs thumb through their (worn-down) playbook No one believes those lines anymore.......................................see 2016 . 1
boyst Posted April 11, 2018 Posted April 11, 2018 Trump signs EO to put unemployed back to work Spun as Hitler. What's the difference between this and the New Deal? What's wrong with the TVA? This **** is annoying
IDBillzFan Posted April 11, 2018 Posted April 11, 2018 On 3/19/2018 at 8:25 PM, B-Man said: Meanwhile, “CNN Exploits Holocaust, Suggests ICE Agents are Nazis,” Joel Pollack writes at Big Journalism: While it is brutally tiresome to hear leftists refer to everyone who disagrees with them as Hitler or Nazis or the Gestapo, we can take a little breath knowing that they've finally stopped calling everyone a racist. So that's something, I guess. 1
TakeYouToTasker Posted April 11, 2018 Posted April 11, 2018 (edited) 37 minutes ago, LABillzFan said: While it is brutally tiresome to hear leftists refer to everyone who disagrees with them as Hitler or Nazis or the Gestapo, we can take a little breath knowing that they've finally stopped calling everyone a racist. So that's something, I guess. I suppose, although I always just assumed that they had escalated, and assumed they were using the Nazi references to imply the highest most extreme form of racism. I take my little breath knowing that they've turned the volume on the racism charges all the way up to 11, and can't take it any further than "Nazi". Edited April 11, 2018 by TakeYouToTasker
IDBillzFan Posted April 11, 2018 Posted April 11, 2018 47 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said: I suppose, although I always just assumed that they had escalated, and assumed they were using the Nazi references to imply the highest most extreme form of racism. I take my little breath knowing that they've turned the volume on the racism charges all the way up to 11, and can't take it any further than "Nazi". Look on the bright side: without President Clinton, we escaped four years of every criticism of her being blamed on sexism and misogyny. Sidenote: racism is making a comeback as I was reading today how CNN suggested Sen. John Kennedy was racist yesterday for suggesting to Zuck that Facebook's user agreement feels like it was written in Swahili. 1
B-Man Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 JOHN HINDERAKER: Washington Lies In A Parallel Universe. In the real world, the Trump administration is humming along. Its domestic policies are sensible and have been remarkably successful in a short time. Abroad, the administration has pursued American interests, again with considerable success. It has also made progress, at least, at cleaning up the appalling messes left behind by Barack Obama in Iran, Syria, Russia and North Korea. By any objective standard, the Trump administration is, so far, a major improvement on its predecessor. But our “news” organizations have little interest in any of those topics. They are obsessed with tweets, with ten-year-old liaisons, with non-existent collusion and with investigations of nothing that apparently will never end. In their parallel world, Trump is such a failure that he might as well quit and save the Democrats the trouble of impeaching him. (For what? is a question that rarely seems to be asked.) Take yesterday’s press briefing by Sarah Sanders. As always, she began by describing the substantive work going on in the White House that day. As always, the press corps ignored such mundane topics and went straight to la-la land. Well, yes.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 The media outlets like the Washington Post and NY Times, CNN etc. are the truly good American institutions exposing a corrupt, ignorant President who is damaging our nation. That the "base" is outraged that they actually report his incredible incompetence and don't bow down and worship his bigoted nonsense shows why our founders put the first amendment into the Constitution.
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 22 minutes ago, Tiberius said: The media outlets like the Washington Post and NY Times, CNN etc. are the truly good American institutions exposing a corrupt, ignorant President who is damaging our nation. That the "base" is outraged that they actually report his incredible incompetence and don't bow down and worship his bigoted nonsense shows why our founders put the first amendment into the Constitution.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Koko78 said: How should the media cover an incompetent idiot like Trump? Like Hannity does?
row_33 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 Truly good American institutions.... You just caused the rest of the world to laugh and **** at the same time.
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 14 minutes ago, Tiberius said: How should the media cover an incompetent idiot like Trump? How about honestly, for a change?
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: How about honestly, for a change? About what specifically? Did some section of the NYTimes report something wrong and you are using that to say everything is lies? I get the slant or what they choose to cover my irk some people, but what lies are they telling about Trump who is a proven liar, bigot, con artist and incompetent? Those are all demonstrably true.
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 6 minutes ago, Tiberius said: About what specifically? Did some section of the NYTimes report something wrong and you are using that to say everything is lies? I get the slant or what they choose to cover my irk some people, but what lies are they telling about Trump who is a proven liar, bigot, con artist and incompetent? Those are all demonstrably true. Oh, so we're pretending that the NY Times is now a bastion of fair and impartial journalism rather than Democrats with by-lines? 1
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 3 minutes ago, Koko78 said: Oh, so we're pretending that the NY Times is now a bastion of fair and impartial journalism rather than Democrats with by-lines? What lies or untruths are they telling? Seems like they come out with a completely truthful story and you guys act like its a lie
Koko78 Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, Tiberius said: What lies or untruths are they telling? Seems like they come out with a completely truthful story and you guys act like its a lie When a "news" outlet only selects half the story to tell, they're not being honest. They're being DNC propagandists. However, if you want a specific example: they lied about the intelligence community fully supporting the now-debunked Steele dossier. They took months to print a retraction, and guess what? The retraction wasn't a featured story like their false assertions were. But hey, at least we still have the centrists at CNN telling us all about how Trump had TWO scoops of ice cream.
Tiberius Posted April 12, 2018 Posted April 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Koko78 said: When a "news" outlet only selects half the story to tell, they're not being honest. They're being DNC propagandists. However, if you want a specific example: they lied about the intelligence community fully supporting the now-debunked Steele dossier. They took months to print a retraction, and guess what? The retraction wasn't a featured story like their false assertions were. But hey, at least we still have the centrists at CNN telling us all about how Trump had TWO scoops of ice cream. I'm a news junkie, I don't recall the Times or anyone saying the intelligence community fully supported the Steele dossier. When the F did that happen? And when did it become "debunked"?
Recommended Posts