Doc Brown Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 And does anyone believe that? Yes. Many Fox viewers do.
Nanker Posted April 9, 2017 Author Posted April 9, 2017 They're more fair and balanced than MSNBC and CNN... and ABC, CBS, and NBC for that matter. The WaPo is totally anti-Trump. It's owned by a Bozo billionaire that hates Trump. The NY Times is also totally anti-Trump, as is the LA Times. Bloomberg is too, but a little less so than those above. The WSJ is about as close to a fair and balanced national paper that we have.
B-Man Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 Isn't Fox's logo "Fair and Balanced"? Deflection. Isn't the difference between an opinion show and the 'straight' news obvious to most ? even you folks in the 'middle'
reddogblitz Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 "Both sides" guy strikes again. At least "both sides guy" isn't foolish enough to hitch his wagon to either of these tire fire organizations. You go "both sides guy". Serious question, which political party is NOT corrupt?
B-Man Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) There's nothing wrong with using your judgement to decide which side is closer to what you believe, just damning everyone is not a real position. Edited April 9, 2017 by B-Man
reddogblitz Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 There's nothing wrong with using your judgement to decide which side is closer to what you believe, just damning everyone is not a real position. You're either with us, or against us.
DC Tom Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 You're either with us, or against us. Time To Choose Sides. Can I get 4-1 odds on a banking holiday by 2012 again?
B-Man Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 You're either with us, or against us. No. this is an incorrect comparison. I said that YOU could use your own judgement to move toward ANY position that YOU deem correct. A gainsay dismissal 'pox on all your houses' is easy. any Gator can do it. .
Doc Brown Posted April 9, 2017 Posted April 9, 2017 (edited) Deflection. Isn't the difference between an opinion show and the 'straight' news obvious to most ? even you folks in the 'middle' I'm not in the middle. I've always voted Democrat. My wife is a public school teacher. However, people are stupid when it comes to politics. Look up any study on America's general knowledge of politics and it will back it up (70% can't even name three branches of government according to 2014 business insider study). If all they watch is Maddow/Hayes or O'Reilly/Hannity then they take their word as gospel. Edited April 9, 2017 by Doc Brown
Joe Miner Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 There's nothing wrong with using your judgement to decide which side is closer to what you believe, just damning everyone is not a real position. She's been ruined. All I can think of when I hear her name is "Margaret Thatcher naked on a cold day."
B-Man Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 POLITICOVerified account @politico 3h3 hours ago ‘That’s the job. We are adversarial.’ http://politi.co/2ohLLtV via @sbg1 in @POLITICOMag Yeah....................sure...
GG Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 Isn't Fox's logo "Fair and Balanced"? In their news segments. Not so much in their infotainment programs at night.
B-Man Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 She's been ruined. All I can think of when I hear her name is "Margaret Thatcher naked on a cold day." Off topic:.....................
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 IMO - Fox News is "balanced". Fox Opinions are biased. Isn't Fox's logo "Fair and Balanced"? And does anyone believe that? Not me. 8 years ago everyone blamed Bush for "failed" policies, now everyone is blaming Obama for "failed" policies. The cycle continues. You can try to drain the swamp, but the stench will still be there. America First. I am not the president of the world. So, we now have battle ready ships in the Middle East and the Korean Peninsula.
Doc Brown Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 (edited) This is messed up if true. Putin is a partner in Syrian genocide. https://apnews.com/19772be1238e49fbb62c509a5b659b3d/Official:-Russia-knew-in-advance-of-Syrian-chemical-attack?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP Edited April 10, 2017 by Doc Brown
DC Tom Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 This is messed up if true. Putin is a partner in Syrian genocide. https://apnews.com/19772be1238e49fbb62c509a5b659b3d/Official:-Russia-knew-in-advance-of-Syrian-chemical-attack?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP That article is nothing but idle, random speculation. A Russian drone "couldn't have been over the hospital by accident" that a "Russian-made" fighter bombed later? That's not exactly damning evidence...it's not any kind of evidence, it's nothing different from what we already knew. I'll see what I can find from better sources. That one is garbage.
/dev/null Posted April 10, 2017 Posted April 10, 2017 This is messed up if true. Putin is a partner in Syrian genocide. https://apnews.com/19772be1238e49fbb62c509a5b659b3d/Official:-Russia-knew-in-advance-of-Syrian-chemical-attack?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP So Putin and Assad colluded to have Trump bomb Assad in an effort to boost Trump's standing at home?
Nanker Posted April 11, 2017 Author Posted April 11, 2017 So Putin and Assad colluded to have Trump bomb Assad in an effort to boost Trump's standing at home? Yes, and prove that Trump's not a Putin sock puppet, but we all know better than that because he IS a Putin sock puppet, so it HAD to be a put-up Putin job.
Recommended Posts