Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

No worries. DNC would've rigged that primary, too.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

 

:wallbash:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

What fake news did they release and how did they release it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

 

:lol: Because it's not like Clinton didn't spend the previous quarter-century proving she has no honesty or character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"To report not on facts, but instead on narratives that yield high ratings, is exactly the definition of fake news

 

 

 

O'KEEFE STRIKES AGAIN: CNN Producer Says Russia Narrative 'Bullsh*t'...

 

"It's a business, people are like the media has an ethical phssssss... All the nice cutesy little ethics that used to get talked about in journalism school you're just like, that's adorable. That's adorable. This is a business."

 

"Trump is good for business right now,"

 

"Just to give you some context, President Trump pulled out of the climate accords and for a day and a half we covered the climate accords. And the CEO of CNN (Jeff Zucker) said in our internal meeting, he said good job everybody covering the climate accords, but we're done with that, let's get back to Russia."

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was Jared Kushner doing meeting with the Kremlin's "bank" manager?

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-veb-putin-bank-that-jared-kushner-met-2017-6

 

 

This "bank" is nothing more than a Kremlin influence peddling institution and Trump is appearently tied up in it to his eyeballs

 

No wonder Kushner is hiring some serious legal help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

"Howd they do it? Basically, by doxxing the Democrats and unleashing fake news. Russia was behind the stories that dominated our headlines, both real and fabricated, for several weeks leading up to the election. In doing so, it bet that casting further doubt on Clintons honesty and character while also polluting the information environment with false stories would affect the decisions of enough voters to increase Trumps chances. It wagered that in a close election, perhaps it could be the difference."

 

Do you wonder why Barry stole the nomination from Hilly back in 2008 EII? Considering she was a former first lady who had been in the public eye for 16 years+ and even had been a US senator for longer than Barry had been? It's because the DNC realized that the more Hilly campaigned, the more people disliked her. It had nothing to do with the Russians then, just as it doesn't now. So they cut a deal with her to let Barry have the presidency and she could make her run in 2016 (and that's the information that was exposed, although it didn't make a difference in the outcome). And guess what? The more people saw of her, the more they disliked her. And she lost. Get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Do you wonder why Barry stole the nomination from Hilly back in 2008 EII? Considering she was a former first lady who had been in the public eye for 16 years+ and even had been a US senator for longer than Barry had been? It's because the DNC realized that the more Hilly campaigned, the more people disliked her. It had nothing to do with the Russians then, just as it doesn't now. So they cut a deal with her to let Barry have the presidency and she could make her run in 2016 (and that's the information that was exposed, although it didn't make a difference in the outcome). And guess what? The more people saw of her, the more they disliked her. And she lost. Get over it.

 

President Obama was a likeable man who could bring back a good chunk of the Nixon/Reagan/Bush Democrats. Dems need a Southerner or acceptable type like Obama to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

President Obama was a likeable man who could bring back a good chunk of the Nixon/Reagan/Bush Democrats. Dems need a Southerner or acceptable type like Obama to win.

 

It was more that he was likeable and not a Repub. After 8 years of Dubya, war and the economy tanking, people wanted a change in parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This isn't even comparable to Hilly's bro getting a gold mine permit from Haiti after the State Department gave the country billions.

 

 

Must be because Barry's now getting hammered over it. :rolleyes:

Barry would have gotten hammered over it IF he spoke up last November as "trying to sway the election"

 

This is a Strawman Frump argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It was more that he was likeable and not a Repub. After 8 years of Dubya, war and the economy tanking, people wanted a change in parties.

 

The US tends to swing from a bit left-of-centre to a bit right-of-centre after each has its turn at the helm.

 

 

Usually the sitting POTUS's party gets taken down a peg or six during offseason elections for Congress.

Edited by row_33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Barry would have gotten hammered over it IF he spoke up last November as "trying to sway the election"

 

This is a Strawman Frump argument.

 

Yeah, that's the lib talking point. But it makes no sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The US tends to swing from a bit left-of-centre to a bit right-of-centre after each has its turn at the helm.

 

 

Usually the sitting POTUS's party gets taken down a peg or six during offseason elections for Congress.

Except 98 when Republicans overstepped on impeaching Clinton or 02 after 9/11

 

Democrats may want to keep 98 in mind while plotting their 'resistance'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Except 98 when Republicans overstepped on impeaching Clinton or 02 after 9/11

 

Democrats may want to keep 98 in mind while plotting their 'resistance'

 

in 94 Clinton was hit hard, very hard for a sitting President

 

Then the pendulum swung back for 98 offseason elections

 

there is nothing new or dramatic under the sun

 

falling in love with someone getting elected is a fool's game, the next morning Canadian and US voters are plotting to make you pay for winning

 

LBJ went from a landslide win in 64 to watching his party fall apart in 68

 

happens...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, that's the lib talking point. But it makes no sense.

Call it what you will Doc.

 

What makes no sense is pretending that had Obama had made this an issue last November you (yes you) would have bitched up a storm and cried foul.

# resist

 

# RoguePOTUSStaff

https://twitter.com/RoguePOTUSStaff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...