Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: You mean exercising presidential power while being the president? 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: With the specific intent to force a conversation with the incoming NSA chief, which you then would leak and politicize in order to undermine the incoming administration and mire them in a completely invented scandal. That's seditious. You left out a part.
Foxx Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: You mean exercising presidential power while being the president? you are an idiot. 1
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Foxx said: you are an idiot. Why is that, foxxy?
Doc Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 20 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'll tell you what is undermining... that would be placing sanctions on another super power days before the end of your term. Barry undermined the country all throughout his admin. Might as well continue it until the bitter end. 2
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You left out a part. That's what thirdn"long" says.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: That's what thirdn"long" says. And you're still running from the fact pattern you left out (because it destroys your position and you're too dishonest to admit you're wrong)
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 4 minutes ago, Foxx said: you are an idiot. No, you are
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: And you're still running from the fact pattern you left out (because it destroys your position and you're too dishonest to admit you're wrong) What fact pattern is that, professor?
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: And you're still running from the fact pattern you left out (because it destroys your position and you're too dishonest to admit you're wrong) Says the guy who can't admit that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion by any reasonably definition
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: What fact pattern is that, professor? Read above. Sound out the big words if you need to.
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 2 hours ago, Just Joshin' said: Can this thread be closed now that the transcripts from the dems admit no collusion? Once we get a determination on the obstruction point we'll probably be good to go.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Tiberius said: Says the guy who can't admit that the Trump Tower meeting was collusion by any reasonably definition Not even Mueller agreed with that ***** off, nitwit. You are bringing a plastic spork to a gunfight. 4
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Read above. Sound out the big words if you need to. Anything specific that you would like me to read?
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, SectionC3 said: Once we get a determination on the obstruction point we'll probably be good to go. Proving you don't know the basic facts on this case. Obstruction has already been determined by the DOJ. No go. Just now, SectionC3 said: Anything specific that you would like me to read? 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: You left out a part.
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Not even Mueller agreed with that ***** off, nitwit. You are bringing a plastic spork to a gunfight. I didn't realize that there are non-plastic sporks. Cool. Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Proving you don't know the basic facts on this case. Obstruction has already been determined by the DOJ. No go. Where and when? The Mueller report left the question open.
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not even Mueller agreed with that ***** off, nitwit. You are bringing a plastic spork to a gunfight. Bull sh it! You lie so easily, don't you 1
Reality Check Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 The trouble with lawyers is that they focus on winning arguments and spinning convincing narratives on behalf of their clients. The trend in having less lawyers in Congress will accelerate. 1
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Reality Check said: The trouble with lawyers is that they focus on winning arguments and spinning convincing narratives on behalf of their clients. The trend in having less lawyers in Congress will accelerate. Or they perform a truth-seeking function more critical now than ever. Either or. 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Bull sh it! You lie so easily, don't you He's of the "if I repeated it enough it might come true" school of politics.
Reality Check Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, SectionC3 said: I didn't realize that there are non-plastic sporks. Cool. Where and when? The Mueller report left the question open. The Mueller report will ultimately prove to be an indictment on the Mueller team itself. Be patient grasshopper.
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Reality Check said: The trouble with lawyers is that they focus on winning arguments and spinning convincing narratives on behalf of their clients. The trend in having less lawyers in Congress will accelerate. Lawyers writing laws! How terrible!
Recommended Posts