billsfan1959 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 16 hours ago, Reality Check said: This is sweet, WZ posted something and I can't even see it. I am starting to understand why the communists are so keen on censorship and narrative control. He said that he found wearing flesh-colored yoga pants to the store scared more people than the coronavirus, he has the gift of being able to paint songs, and that the best opportunities in his life passed him by while he was trying to decide between a cone or a cup. Or, at least I think that is what he said. You know how hard it is to make sense of his posts.... 1
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Lindsey Graham wants more hearings on Russia? Go go for it! As Russia is literally trying to get Trump a second term at least that fact could be highlighted. Will Trump release the transcripts of his secret meetings with Putin?
billsfan1959 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Tiberius said: Lindsey Graham wants more hearings on Russia? Go go for it! As Russia is literally trying to get Trump a second term at least that fact could be highlighted. Will Trump release the transcripts of his secret meetings with Putin? Tell us all again how Russia got Trump his first term. We love that story and it sounds almost real the way you tell it.... 1 1
Tiberius Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 9 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: Tell us all again how Russia got Trump his first term. We love that story and it sounds almost real the way you tell it.... I love Wikileaks! 1
Doc Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 7 minutes ago, billsfan1959 said: Tell us all again how Russia got Trump his first term. We love that story and it sounds almost real the way you tell it.... And while he's at it, he can tell us how much fun it was when Santa delivered his presents Christmas morning. 2
SoCal Deek Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 When you look back on all of this the irony is so deep it makes your head spin! Remember when Hillary brought Russia that stupid dime store reset button? That clearly worked! They must’ve been super impressed with her. Remember when Obama laughed at Romney telling him that Russia was a 1970s problem? Nice job Barry, that was clearly the right policy! Just now, SoCal Deek said: When you look back on all of this the irony is so deep it makes your head spin! Remember when Hillary brought Russia that stupid dime store reset button? That clearly worked! They must’ve been super impressed with her. Remember when Obama laughed at Romney telling him that Russia was a 1970s problem? Nice job Barry, that was clearly the right policy! Remember when Barrack told Russia he’d have more flexibility after his re-election? Yes, that was obviously very impressive to the Kremlin! You can still hear the laughter echoing across the continent.
Just Joshin' Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Can this thread be closed now that the transcripts from the dems admit no collusion? 2
B-Man Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Exactly right @MZHemingway For most rank-and-file Republicans, this is a defining issue—if Senate GOP doesn’t hold #ObamaGate perps publicly accountable, they will—and should—lose power 3 2
Foxx Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 (edited) On 5/13/2020 at 11:53 AM, SectionC3 said: ... Are you saying that the Russia investigation afforded Trump the opportunity to commit an obstruction offense? there is an argument whereby, that if you didn't commit the crime you are being investigated for, theoretically you can't obstruct something you didn't do. Edited May 15, 2020 by Foxx 3 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Foxx said: there is an argument whereby, that if you didn't commit the crime you are being investigated for, theoretically you can't obstruct something you didn't do. Especially when the claims of obstruction involve no actual obstruction of the investigation itself, but instead venting and ranting about how he's innocent (which he was). 2 2
Foxx Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 On 5/13/2020 at 3:09 PM, SectionC3 said: Yeah, no. He's not allowed to act on behalf of America in that capacity until Trump is the president. There's your "undermine." i'll tell you what is undermining... that would be placing sanctions on another super power days before the end of your term. 3 2
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 Just now, Foxx said: i'll tell you what is undermining... that would be placing sanctions on another super power days before the end of your term. With the specific intent to force a conversation with the incoming NSA chief, which you then would leak and politicize in order to undermine the incoming administration and mire them in a completely invented scandal. That's seditious. 1 1
Foxx Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 (edited) On 5/13/2020 at 4:21 PM, daz28 said: Fox supports 99% of your points, CNN goes against 99%. Let's take a trip back in time shall we. When Fox used to say the debt's too big, and you used to argue right along with them. Ahhh memory lane. Oh shoot I just won they said Flynn the problem is... both ends work against the middle. neither have yours, nor my best interests at heart, it is all about propping up the establishment, regardless of the angle. turn off the ***** tv. On 5/13/2020 at 5:19 PM, SectionC3 said: Yeah, no. Flynn was out of line. Wasn’t his call to make and undermined the sitting administration. you're an idiot. undermining a sitting administration that had days left on the calendar. this is the hill you want to die on, eh? Edited May 15, 2020 by Foxx 2
BillStime Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: With the specific intent to force a conversation with the incoming NSA chief, which you then would leak and politicize in order to undermine the incoming administration and mire them in a completely invented scandal. That's seditious. Release the actual tapes.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 1 minute ago, BillStime said: Release the actual tapes. Actual tapes of what? The call? The same call Obama's DOJ said nothing illegal happened on? That one? Or do you mean the original 302 which the FBI agents illegally edited after their interview with Flynn? Which one do you think has more bearing on this case? 1
SectionC3 Posted May 15, 2020 Posted May 15, 2020 16 minutes ago, Foxx said: i'll tell you what is undermining... that would be placing sanctions on another super power days before the end of your term. You mean exercising presidential power while being the president? 1
Recommended Posts