Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

 

 

BRIAN CATES: The ‘Wrong Scandal’ Keeps Winning.

 

One scandal, commonly referred to as “Russiagate,” claims that the man who had just won the election was an undercover agent who took orders straight from Moscow.

 

The other one that emerged claimed the first scandal was always a false construct of the rival Hillary Clinton campaign and its politicized allies within the federal government’s intelligence and law enforcement agencies. This second scandal came to be called “Spygate.”

 

One of these scandals was indeed fake and the other was very real.

 

Most of the U.S. media went all-in on the proposition that the fake scandal was real and the real scandal was fake.

 

However, the scandal that was endlessly promoted by mainstream news outlets turned out to be a hoax, as shown by the investigations by special counsel Robert Mueller and Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Meanwhile, the scandal they dismissed as a “wild conspiracy theory” turned out to be real.

 

 

Read the whole thing.

 
 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
On 3/5/2020 at 11:02 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Mr. Walnut sauce is having a tough moment. 

How many emails have they hacked so far? I love wikileaks! 

Posted
On 3/5/2020 at 11:02 AM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Mr. Walnut sauce is having a tough moment. 

 

Imagine what Hilliary's $1B could have...oh, wait a minute!

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Oops

 


That was always for an easy numbers game "win".  When that didn't materialize (I laughed out loud when they sent an attorney to court), I was surprised the case wasn't dropped immediately. No way did the Mueller Team want to give anything up in discovery.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • 1 month later...
Posted

WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan Senate report released Tuesday affirms the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in a far-ranging influence campaign approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin and aimed at helping Donald Trump win the White House.

The report rejects Trump’s claims that the intelligence community was biased against him when it concluded that Russia had interfered on his behalf in the election. It says instead that intelligence officials had specific information that Russia preferred Trump in the election, that it sought to denigrate Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton and that Putin had “approved and directed aspects” of the Kremlin’s influence campaign.

The heavily-redacted report from the Senate Intelligence Committee is part of the panel’s more than three-year investigation into Russian interference. Intelligence agencies concluded in January 2017 that Russians had engaged in cyber-espionage and distributed messages through Russian-controlled propaganda outlets to undermine public faith in the democratic process, hurt Clinton and aid Trump, who ultimately became president.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

WASHINGTON (AP) — A bipartisan Senate report released Tuesday affirms the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election in a far-ranging influence campaign approved by Russian President Vladimir Putin and aimed at helping Donald Trump win the White House.

The report rejects Trump’s claims that the intelligence community was biased against him when it concluded that Russia had interfered on his behalf in the election. It says instead that intelligence officials had specific information that Russia preferred Trump in the election, that it sought to denigrate Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton and that Putin had “approved and directed aspects” of the Kremlin’s influence campaign.

The heavily-redacted report from the Senate Intelligence Committee is part of the panel’s more than three-year investigation into Russian interference. Intelligence agencies concluded in January 2017 that Russians had engaged in cyber-espionage and distributed messages through Russian-controlled propaganda outlets to undermine public faith in the democratic process, hurt Clinton and aid Trump, who ultimately became president.

Who your enemy wants to win your election should tell you all you need to know. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Warren Zevon said:

 

Saw that yesterday. 

Looks like there might be a food fight over this if Barr tries to indict someone for political reasons 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 hours ago, daz28 said:

Who your enemy wants to win your election should tell you all you need to know. 

 

When the people who lied to you, for four years about Trump being a Russian asset, continue to lie to you and you keep believing them -- it tells you all you need to know about your level of understanding on this topic. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
×
×
  • Create New...