Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 8/30/2019 at 11:50 PM, Wacka said:

No one mentioned the Sabres defeating the Soviets 12-6 on Jan 4, 1976.

 

that was the Wings team, a division 3 assortment

 

Habs tied the real team, Red Army, and the Broad Street Bullies intimated them into jelly

 

Posted
Quote

"The United States successfully extracted from Russia one of its highest-level covert sources inside the Russian government, multiple Trump administration officials with direct knowledge told CNN. A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.” 

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/09/politics/russia-us-spy-extracted/index.html

Lost asset ? 

Posted

 

 

The New York Times already proved CNN's story as fake..........

 

 

9 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

7 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
32 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Proved how? Through wishful thinking? ?

  Your story?  Yes, you are employing wishful thinking.  Actually, it sounds like the kind of story they read you at bedtime at the cubicle farm.  You know kind of like Goldilocks or Little Red Ridinghood.  Do you all sit in a circle in your jammies while Soros reads sitting in his chair?

Posted

EXTRACT THIS

CNN returns to the theme of the Russiagate hoax in Jim Sciutto’s “Exclusive: US extracted top spy from inside Russia in 2017.” You’d think the network might have followed the New York Times in moving on from “Russia” to “racism,” but no. It has induced the Times return to the Russiagate hoax with one of those triple bylined stories by David Sanger and the gang in “C.I.A. informant extracted from Russia had sent secrets to U.S. for decades.”

 

Citing precisely one source, CNN inserts the key Trump-hating angle in the story’s second sentence: “A person directly involved in the discussions said that the removal of the Russian was driven, in part, by concerns that President Donald Trump and his administration repeatedly mishandled classified intelligence and could contribute to exposing the covert source as a spy.” What “discussions”? The lead sentence refers to no “discussions.”

?

 

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/09/extract-this.php

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Yes, it all happened without any discussions! The CIA (Deep State) is really that good! :thumbsup:

 

You'd be guilty of gross misconduct leaving a top spy in there with Trump handling intelligence. 

Posted
1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

Treason abounds amongst our elite media.

 

Consider it from another angle... 

 

The "spy" would seemingly be important for Barr/Durham to interview -- yet he's been living in DC under his REAL name for this whole time. Does that sound like a man who's hiding from Putin? Yet Fusion Ken D (who's a PROVEN CIA/Brennan asset, not journalist) is the one not only pushing the story but doxxing the guy and revealing his address to the public. Why? 

 

Could it be he's more of a threat to the mockingbird media/Brennan's operation than he is to Putin or the USIC's current mission? 

 

This is a cleanup operation. Designed to get loose ends either killed or removed from the board before they can rock the boat. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Yes, it all happened without any discussions! The CIA (Deep State) is really that good! :thumbsup:

 

You'd be guilty of gross misconduct leaving a top spy in there with Trump handling intelligence. 

You mean like Clinton/Obama/Kerry did with our operatives in China?

 

You're not very good at this... 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
34 minutes ago, Cinga said:

You mean like Clinton/Obama/Kerry did with our operatives in China?

 

You're not very good at this... 

Ahhh....the old make up a whataboutism and then toss in a quick insult to stir the passions. 

 

Anger clouds reason in the brain 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ahhh....the old make up a whataboutism and then toss in a quick insult to stir the passions. 

 

Anger clouds reason in the brain 

How would you know?

×
×
  • Create New...