Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said:

Boy, thanks to all of the earlier discussion, we can save a lot of money on this possible investigation.  As has been stated here by several posters, collusion is not a crime.  No need investigating anything there.  And, as Rudy explains, taking information from Russians is no problem either. 

 

So, summarizing, nothing to see here.  We shouldn't have investigated the last Russian collusion issue, we certainly shouldn't undertake another identical investigation.  Move along, right?

 

No, Bob.

 

The problem isn’t with investigating Logan Act violations, or conspiracy crimes.  We should, in fact, must do those things.

 

The problem is when a person, or group of persons, fraudulently and criminally concocts an investigation into conspiracy crimes they themselves know don’t exist because they made them up from whole cloth in order to frame a political opponent as part of a soft coup attempt.

 

These things are very different.

  • Like (+1) 4
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

JOHN KASS: Why have Democrats lost their curiosity over the Trump-Russia story?

Sunshine is conspiracy? Transparency in federal investigations is “un-American?” Ridiculous. An idiotic parrot chewing on its own toes and demanding crackers has more sense. And just who weaponized law enforcement Mr. Schiff?

 

I am not saying any crime occurred, nor that any conspiracy was hatched and then flown like a raptor to take Trump down. It smells, yes, but we don’t know. Let’s allow sunshine and find out. Isn’t anyone curious?

 

Barr has assigned John. H. Durham, a respected career prosecutor and U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to find out. Also investigating is Michael Horowitz, inspector general of the Department of Justice. They’re pulling the threads of how all this started, with the FISA warrant application and who knew what about the former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. He was the author of the Steele dossier, was on the Clinton political payroll and used Russian contacts to put a political case together against Trump, which was then leaked to the media.

 

Already there is indication that some players have begun pointing fingers at each other in panic, just like a few sweaty Chicago aldermen I know.

 

In Washington, on Trump, did they do things by the book?

 

There was that weird Jan. 20, 2017, email that Susan Rice wrote to herself. It reportedly documented a Jan. 5 meeting between then President Barack Obama, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then FBI director James Comey and Vice President Joe Biden in which the Steele dossier was discussed.

 

In her strange email to herself, Rice noted that Obama said everything should be done “by the book.”

 

By the book, really? Who talks like that? Someone covering their behinds?

 

Yes.

 
 
 
.
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

I'd love @oldmanfan or any of the ones who were down here for two years screaming "there's fire under the smoke!" re collusion to respond to this. Why does this no longer matter? Aren't you all pissed that you were (clearly) lied to by whatever information sources you relied on to form your opinion in 2017-2018? Or do they all get a pass because Orange Man Bad and IMPEACH! 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I'd love @oldmanfan or any of the ones who were down here for two years screaming "there's fire under the smoke!" re collusion to respond to this. Why does this no longer matter? Aren't you all pissed that you were (clearly) lied to by whatever information sources you relied on to form your opinion in 2017-2018? Or do they all get a pass because Orange Man Bad and IMPEACH! 

Trump was trying to build a hotel in Moscow and working with the Russians while the Russians were hacking our election system, right? 

 

That is a true statement. 

 

 

Conspiracy ?

Posted
26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Trump was trying to build a hotel in Moscow and working with the Russians while the Russians were hacking our election system, right? 

 

That is a true statement. 

 

 

Conspiracy ?

 

Yeah you got something there.  He starting working with the Italians but they weren't much help. 

Posted
Just now, Chef Jim said:

 

Yeah you got something there.  He starting working with the Italians but they weren't much help. 

Oh, figured you were going to blame Hillary for it, or that, or for everything. 

 

 

Posted
Just now, Tiberius said:

Oh, figured you were going to blame Hillary for it, or that, or for everything. 

 

 

 

No I blame one thing on her and that is that we now have a President Trump. For some reason you don't want to answer my question as to why YOU think she lost. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

No I blame one thing on her and that is that we now have a President Trump. For some reason you don't want to answer my question as to why YOU think she lost. 

 

Clearly it was Comey Russians misogyany scared women voting how their husbands told them to vote Comey Russia Comey.

 

Certainly not that she was an unrelatable entitled corrupt swamp B word who insulted half the country, then ran a victory lap instead of a campaign, ignoring mass swathes of her voters in Pennsyltucky and the midwest because 'it was her turn'.

 

Actually, as I think about it, her 2016 stupidity in ignoring the Electoral College because 'it was her turn' was pretty reminiscent of how she dropped the ball in 2008 by not understanding how the DNC delegate system worked. Obama's team exploited every DNC rule and loophole to take as many delegates as he could in each state, while she campaigned under the assumption that she would win them all on primary day.

Posted

Comey's re-opening was THE DAGGER for Hillary's efforts

 

i'm still shocked and chuckling over this move

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Jared Kushner says that if the Russians contact him again about the election he doesn't know if he will contact the FBI? Seriously? How does he have a security clearance? This is outrageous

 

 
 

From your link:

 

Asked if he'd call the FBI if it happened again, Kushner said: "I don't know. It's hard to do hypotheticals, but the reality is is that we were not given anything that was salacious."

Posted
11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

From your link:

 

Asked if he'd call the FBI if it happened again, Kushner said: "I don't know. It's hard to do hypotheticals, but the reality is is that we were not given anything that was salacious."

Ya, who knows? ?

Posted
11 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Ya, who knows? ?

You're the one that quoted him first so you must believe he's credible. This is almost too easy:

 

See the source image

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...