Deranged Rhino Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/443509-top-connecticut-federal-prosecutor-assigned-to-investigate-russia 3
Nanker Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 On 5/10/2019 at 3:42 PM, Hedge said: Meanwhile in Russia: I like how the defender almost considers thinking about trying before falling asleep. Then pure collusion is on display as goalie Trump allows Putin to score. Could be a good pickup for The Sabres. On 5/11/2019 at 11:25 AM, /dev/null said: Tempting. Very tempting.
3rdnlng Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 Putin & The Rocket Man are purportedly going to pair up in a 2-man golf scramble. The over/under on their 18-hole score is "3". 3
Tiberius Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 Quote Russian hackers had a successful “intrusion“ into the voting registration files of two Florida counties in 2015, Gov. Ron DeSantis said today. The FBI asked that the names of the counties not be disclosed, DeSantis said in a press conference. The hacking did not affect any vote tallying and DeSantis said there is no evidence of “manipulation.” Florida was singled out in special prosecutor Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference in the 2016 elections. The FBI will hold classified briefings with members of the Florida congressional delegation this week about the suspected Russian hacking. https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2019/05/14/russians-accessed-voter-records-in-two-florida-counties-fbi-confirms-1015760 They are probably lying about the lack of manipulation. What was the point of Russians hacking in 2016? To help Trump win. Why were they hacking? To help Trump win
snafu Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 8 hours ago, Nanker said: Could be a good pickup for The Sabres. Tempting. Very tempting. Do it.
Koko78 Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 7 minutes ago, snafu said: Do it. That'd be great. Sabres will win the Stanley Cup, or 29 other NHL teams might magically find radioactive materials in their water bottles! 1
DC Tom Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 14 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That'd be great. Sabres will win the Stanley Cup, or 29 other NHL teams might magically find radioactive materials in their water bottles! "Alexander Ovechkin turns the puck over eighteen times, and Evgeny Kuznetsov scores two own-goals, and Dmitri Orlov draws a five-minute major for making a run at his own goalie in a shocking 15--0 Sabres victory over the Washington Capitals!" 1
snafu Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 22 minutes ago, Koko78 said: That'd be great. Sabres will win the Stanley Cup, or 29 other NHL teams might magically find radioactive materials in their water bottles! I was talking about his Avatar switch... Putin sucks. His skating style is stiff, and he's weak on the puck. Decent backhand, but he's probably a locker room distraction. Likely tries to undermine the coaching staff. 1 1
3rdnlng Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 5 minutes ago, DC Tom said: "Alexander Ovechkin turns the puck over eighteen times, and Evgeny Kuznetsov scores two own-goals, and Dmitri Orlov draws a five-minute major for making a run at his own goalie in a shocking 15--0 Sabres victory over the Washington Capitals!" Except Putin got his info about the number of teams in the NHL from the KGB out of habit. If he would have asked the GRU instead they would have been a little better informed and told him that there are 31 teams in the NHL, and poisoning 29 teams was one team too short. The Conference title series was won over Washington but we had to face the mighty unpoisoned Coyotes in the finals. As usual every shot we had at the goal was wide right and the Coyotes took us in 4 straight.
Koko78 Posted May 14, 2019 Posted May 14, 2019 1 hour ago, snafu said: I was talking about his Avatar switch... Putin sucks. His skating style is stiff, and he's weak on the puck. Decent backhand, but he's probably a locker room distraction. Likely tries to undermine the coaching staff. Geeze, you send 15 coaches to the Siberian Gulags, and people suddenly think you're 'undermining' them. 2
B-Man Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 Will The Real Russia-Collusion Scandal Please Stand Up? Issues & Insights Original Article Now that the smoke from the always-dubious Trump-Russia investigation has cleared, the real scandal is finally coming into focus. Namely, the one where the Obama administration, the Hillary Clinton campaign, and various top law enforcement officials apparently worked together to spy on the campaign of their political opponent. A scandal with far more credible evidence to back it up than the phony Russia collusion story. On Monday, news broke that Attorney General William Barr had appointed John Durham, the top federal prosecutor in Connecticut, to investigate the FBI’s use of the Clinton-campaign-financed “dossier” More at the link:
Bob in Mich Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 Boy, thanks to all of the earlier discussion, we can save a lot of money on this possible investigation. As has been stated here by several posters, collusion is not a crime. No need investigating anything there. And, as Rudy explains, taking information from Russians is no problem either. So, summarizing, nothing to see here. We shouldn't have investigated the last Russian collusion issue, we certainly shouldn't undertake another identical investigation. Move along, right? 1
RochesterRob Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 9 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Boy, thanks to all of the earlier discussion, we can save a lot of money on this possible investigation. As has been stated here by several posters, collusion is not a crime. No need investigating anything there. And, as Rudy explains, taking information from Russians is no problem either. So, summarizing, nothing to see here. We shouldn't have investigated the last Russian collusion issue, we certainly shouldn't undertake another identical investigation. Move along, right? So if Russian tampering was evident in prior elections and favored a Democrat you would be in favor of investigating and prosecuting those occurrences as well? I didn't think so. Tell me anything that anything back in 2012 and prior does not matter for whatever reason.
GG Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 16 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Boy, thanks to all of the earlier discussion, we can save a lot of money on this possible investigation. As has been stated here by several posters, collusion is not a crime. No need investigating anything there. And, as Rudy explains, taking information from Russians is no problem either. So, summarizing, nothing to see here. We shouldn't have investigated the last Russian collusion issue, we certainly shouldn't undertake another identical investigation. Move along, right? How about the inverse? If someone is convicted of a serious crime that they did not commit, and the conviction was due to severe misconduct on the part of the police and prosecutors - should the defense give up because the sentencing was already handed down? 3
Bob in Mich Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 If we have a hole in our system that is allowing recurring interference, we need to close it. I don't care when it was discovered or who took past advantage, nor should any American, imo. Why, are you only in favor of looking for wrongdoing in your opponents? So, you are OK then if your side commits crimes in order to succeed? Wow! 1
B-Man Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 Just now, Bob in Mich said: If we have a hole in our system that is allowing recurring interference, we need to close it. I don't care when it was discovered or who took past advantage, nor should any American, imo. If no one should "care" about who or how past interference occurred.......................then you are sure as hell never going to "close it" 1
Bob in Mich Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 1 minute ago, B-Man said: If no one should "care" about who or how past interference occurred.......................then you are sure as hell never going to "close it" Again, congratulations on your new found typing ability. In the context of 'us or them' I don't care about who or how. In other words, investigate wrongdoing whenever it is discovered, regardless of party affiliation.
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 38 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Boy, thanks to all of the earlier discussion, we can save a lot of money on this possible investigation. As has been stated here by several posters, collusion is not a crime. No need investigating anything there. And, as Rudy explains, taking information from Russians is no problem either. So, summarizing, nothing to see here. We shouldn't have investigated the last Russian collusion issue, we certainly shouldn't undertake another identical investigation. Move along, right? There's a Ukraine thread where this should really go. 20 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Why, are you only in favor of looking for wrongdoing in your opponents? So, you are OK then if your side commits crimes in order to succeed? Wow! Things no one said for $1000 (When you can't argue the facts - because you don't know them - invent them and argue those) 13 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said: Again, congratulations on your new found typing ability. In the context of 'us or them' I don't care about who or how. In other words, investigate wrongdoing whenever it is discovered, regardless of party affiliation. All your posts in this thread paint a different picture on that -- since you've ignored real evidence shared with you on this matter for years. But details. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted May 15, 2019 Posted May 15, 2019 (original tweet) Bob, care to comment on any of this hypocrisy since you are bent on inventing what people have said down here instead of discussing it honestly? 1
Recommended Posts