Deranged Rhino Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 What have I said since day one of these committees? The Senate Intel committee is the swampiest committee on the Hill. Remember: Warner is directly involved in crimes during this saga, including criminal leaking and collusion with Daripaska and other Russians. Remember: James Wolfe was the Senate staffer from this committee who was indicted for leaking to the NYTs and WaPo.
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 On 3/20/2017 at 5:45 PM, DC Tom said: The accusation's made, so the lines are drawn, 80% of America's convinced one way or another. No amount of facts either way is going to change that. More than two years ago. When I'm right, I'm really right. 1
snafu Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 37 minutes ago, DC Tom said: More than two years ago. When I'm right, I'm really right. Self praise is no recommendation. 2
row_33 Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 they find anything yet? people in my life have been very concerned about this for over two years now.
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2019 Posted April 4, 2019 15 minutes ago, snafu said: Self praise is no recommendation. It is when it's empirical. 2
Tiberius Posted April 16, 2019 Posted April 16, 2019 My buddy Puty did it? Then who cares? Quote Last March, top national security officials gathered inside the White House to discuss with Mr. Trump how to respond to the nerve agent attack in Britain on Sergei V. Skripal, the former Russian intelligence agent. London was pushing for the White House to expel dozens of suspected Russian operatives, but Mr. Trump was skeptical. He had initially written off the poisoning as part of legitimate spy games, distasteful but within the bounds of espionage. Some officials said they thought that Mr. Trump, who has frequently criticized “rats” and other turncoats, had some sympathy for the Russian government’s going after someone viewed as a traitor. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/us/politics/gina-haspel-trump.html
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 (edited) Paging those who have been quiet... care to revise your previous statements/predictions? Edited April 18, 2019 by Deranged Rhino
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2019 Posted April 18, 2019 On 3/11/2017 at 9:31 AM, Logic said: Just wanted to pop in to say that anyone who honestly thinks Trump did not collude with Russians to sway the election is either not paying attention, is blinded by partisan politics, or is being willfully ignorant. There is smoke, and more smoke, and more smoke. Follow Louise Mensch, John Schindler, or Malcolm Nance on Twitter. All well connected and intelligent people with connections (and/or former employment) in the intelligence community. And before you say "They're liberals with an axe to grind!"...no they're not. Schindler and Mensch in particular are conservatives. They're just honest, patriotic conservatives, unlike the multitudes of spineless jellyfish that call themselves congressmen. Read the Trump Dossier, spend even 10 minutes really looking at all of the confirmed instances of Trump's people meeting and working with Russia, and you'll see that the issue is cut and dry. Page, Manafort, Flynn, Sessions, etc, etc...is anyone REALLY still saying there's nothing there? C'mon! So, @Logic does this make Robert Mueller a "blind partisan" or "willfully ignorant"? No collusion, no conspiracy to sway the election. Despite everything else written in the report those two theories have been thoroughly shown to be fabrications and false. The Steele Dossier you put so much stock in in this post has also been shown, by Mueller's own investigation, to have been bunk on it's core charges: * Cohen was never in Prague, he never coordinated a hack with Russian GRU and Trump. (Nance, Mensch, and Abramson all got those wrong, wrong, wrong) * There never was a pee tape (oops!) So... care to change your bull#### statement now? Or are you going to double down on what we now KNOW was a fabricated story, pushed on you by proven liars and manipulators who sought to overturn the legal results of an election? Which door will he choose? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 For those who missed Seth Abramson's meltdown yesterday... it's worth the laugh. He lost his mind years ago - but now is desperate to stay relevant after gaslighting his readers for two years. This is not a well man. He's sick in the head and should be thoroughly shamed for his actions the past two years.
Deranged Rhino Posted April 19, 2019 Posted April 19, 2019 This is checkmate as I said yesterday: Remember, Page and the dossier were the start of the investigation. Despite trying to say it was Downer's conversation with P-Dop, we know that is false. Strzok, Page, Preistap all went to London to meet with Chris Steele before Downer sat down with P-Dop. What were they talking about with Steele if not the dossier? Without the dossier, they don't get the FISA. Without the dossier, they don't get Trump under surveillance while he's president. The predicate upon which those warrants were based, and upon which the investigation was opened, was FAKE. They knew it was fake, and did it anyway. This is going to end up coming back hard on all the coup plotters. And this is (one of the the many things) that will get the Clinton campaign players in trouble: 3
Recommended Posts