/dev/null Posted December 12, 2018 Posted December 12, 2018 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Because what you say ain't worth a sh it.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 And who is Torshin connected to, Peace? (Hint, it's not Trump or his team)
Warren Zevon Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: And who is Torshin connected to, Peace? (Hint, it's not Trump or his team) He donated between $50k and $100 k to the Clinton foundation. He dined with Trump Jr. during the 2016 NRA convention. He was caught by the Spanish authorities on legal wiretaps during the 2016 presidential election. He's connected to many folks. Let the facts play out. You may need to adjust your tinfoil hat. Edited December 13, 2018 by peace out
Deranged Rhino Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 Just now, peace out said: He donated between $50k and $100 k to the Clinton foundation. He dined with Trump Jr. during the 2016 NRA convention. He was caught by the Spanish authorities on legal wiretaps during the 2016 presidential election. He's connected to many folks. Let the facts play out. You may need to adjust your tinfoil hat. You're getting closer (not trying to be a dick, trying to get you to discover for yourself because it always has more impact). Who's running the Butina investigation? Mueller? Or is it Trump's DOJ?
Warren Zevon Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: You're getting closer (not trying to be a dick, trying to get you to discover for yourself because it always has more impact). Who's running the Butina investigation? Mueller? Or is it Trump's DOJ? There's a reason this isn't in the Mueller thread. I'm well aware of the conspiracies surrounding Torshin. I suggest, though, we each wait for the facts to come out before connecting him to either political party. 1
3rdnlng Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 2 minutes ago, peace out said: There's a reason this isn't in the Mueller thread. I'm well aware of the conspiracies surrounding Torshin. I suggest, though, we each wait for the facts to come out before connecting him to either political party. Now you call for waiting for the facts to come out before jumping to conclusions. 1
Warren Zevon Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 4 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Now you call for waiting for the facts to come out before jumping to conclusions. I'll wait for you to quote any "conclusion" I've ever posted here. Take your time
Warren Zevon Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This was reported a few days ago by various outlets. Erickson is likely screwed and that unnamed person must be sweating bullets right now.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 13, 2018 Posted December 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, peace out said: This was reported a few days ago by various outlets. Erickson is likely screwed and that unnamed person must be sweating bullets right now.
DC Tom Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Thread: The Obama administration provided information to the Senate Intelligence Committee prior to leaving office, and prior to an administration taking office they were afraid would suppress the information. I'm not seeing a hell of a lot of malfeasance in that.
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The Obama administration provided information to the Senate Intelligence Committee prior to leaving office, and prior to an administration taking office they were afraid would suppress the information. I'm not seeing a hell of a lot of malfeasance in that. You might wanna read the article.
DC Tom Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: You might wanna read the article. I did. There's not a hell of a lot of evidence of malfeasance in the article, either. Mostly supposition masquerading as fact.
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 12 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I did. There's not a hell of a lot of evidence of malfeasance in the article, either. Mostly supposition masquerading as fact. okiedokie
Nanker Posted December 14, 2018 Posted December 14, 2018 Didn't the DOJ do the same thing back then? I remember (vaguely) that some (interim perhaps) Department head rushing to get things put out into the air because they were "afraid" the new administration would bury the info. Sally Yates perhaps?
GG Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 Step up to the plate Greggy, real news or disinformation? New report on Russian disinformation, prepared for the Senate, shows the operation’s scale and sweep Quote A report prepared for the Senate that provides the most sweeping analysis yet of Russia’s disinformation campaign around the 2016 election found the operation used every major social media platform to deliver words, images and videos tailored to voters’ interests to help elect President Trump — and worked even harder to support him while in office. The report, a draft of which was obtained by The Washington Post, is the first to study the millions of posts provided by major technology firms to the Senate Intelligence Committee, led by Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), its chairman, and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.), its ranking Democrat. The bipartisan panel hasn’t said whether it endorses the findings. It plans to release it publicly along with another study later this week.
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 17, 2018 Posted December 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, GG said: Step up to the plate Greggy, real news or disinformation? New report on Russian disinformation, prepared for the Senate, shows the operation’s scale and sweep Washington Post = Fiction. That was easy. 1
Recommended Posts