Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


And the taxpayers are paying for this ****.

 

We paid for the Whitewater fiasco.  What'd people expect?  This is what happens when you give an independent investigator carte blanche to find evidence to create a crime.

Posted

So Trump must have continued with the betrayal of the US the last 18 months, far worse now because he’s the Prez

 

the treason couldn’t have stopped, must be at least 100 secret meetings with spies by now

Posted
6 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

What the hell does that even mean, "Examining Tweets?"  What, are they going to post them on on a football message board somewhere for people to read?  And how the hell can that be "wide-ranging?"  These aren't 30,000 emails on a private server.  They're public text messages.  

 

That Muller's team would read them isn't ridiculous.  That the story would be presented as some sort of mammoth new direction the investigation is taking, that is ridiculous.

 

It's gotta be fake. Three anonymous sources reporting it, with Maggie Haberman penning it. That's a recipe for fake news. 

Posted
1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

We paid for the Whitewater fiasco.  What'd people expect?  This is what happens when you give an independent investigator carte blanche to find evidence to create a crime.


When did it morph from "collusion" to Tweets? JFC... TWEETS!?

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's gotta be fake. Three anonymous sources reporting it, with Maggie Haberman penning it. That's a recipe for fake news. 



I sincerely hope you are correct.

Posted
Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


When did it morph from "collusion" to Tweets? JFC... TWEETS!?

 

Because the tweets are public statements that may have obstructed the investigation into the collusion they can't find.  

 

This is specious, of course...but it is still less specious than the lie about the dress that had no connection to Whitewater.  This is why some of us were against this "special investigation" from the start.  It is a witch hunt..."Dammit, you did something wrong, and we're not going to stop looking until we invent it!"

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


When did it morph from "collusion" to Tweets? JFC... TWEETS!?



I sincerely hope you are correct.

 

Me too! 

 

It just smacks of it. It fits the pattern we've seen from Maggie: immediately after a major Trump victory, she pushes out unnamed sources talking about something inane. It's just now this is a new level of inanity. 

 

Maggie is nervous. Wolfe was indicted for leaking (the us redacted FISA application) to journalists. She's been on the teet of the Clinton machine for years and knows she's exposed. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's gotta be fake. Three anonymous sources reporting it, with Maggie Haberman penning it. That's a recipe for fake news. 

 

Haberman gets her scoops straight from John Barron.

Posted
1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's gotta be fake. Three anonymous sources reporting it, with Maggie Haberman penning it. That's a recipe for fake news. 

Well it must be fake because Mueller is running a tight ship that would never leak.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

MOLLIE HEMINGWAY: Media Gaslighting Can’t Hide Fact Trump Campaign Was Spied On.

Whatever you think about Trump’s reaction to the release of the FISA application, the media reaction to the story was disingenuous and even more hyperbolic than the president’s tweets. After a year of continuous and alarming revelations, the media are still more interested in proving the Trump campaign treasonously colluded with Russia than wrestling with the fact that the FBI spied on a presidential campaign, and used dubious partisan political research to justify their surveillance.

 

The media reaction to both the redacted Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) wiretap applications and President Trump’s tweets was pure gaslighting. They claimed the FISA applications hurt the critics’ case. It wasn’t that they reported the news that critics of the FISA application felt vindicated while defenders of the wiretap applications also felt vindicated. They wrote as partisans in a war with those skeptical of FISA abuse.

Posted

So Mueller's cabal is attempting to prove that Trump was dog whistling to potential witnesses in his "case" against Trump to interfere with and obstruct his version of "justice."

It must be hard for the Never Trumpers to draw breath each and every day knowing that he's the POTUS and Hillary is just a hag living out her life in Chappaqua. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Nanker said:

So Mueller's cabal is attempting to prove that Trump was dog whistling to potential witnesses in his "case" against Trump to interfere with and obstruct his version of "justice."

It must be hard for the Never Trumpers to draw breath each and every day knowing that he's the POTUS and Hillary is just a hag living out her life in Chappaqua. 

 

Wait till Trump fills the Bader-Ginsburg court seat with Amy Coney Barrett....

 

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Nanker said:

Oh, I'm waiting alright. I'll pop a champagne cork to old "One Eye" Harry Reid when she's confirmed too. 

Oh to having the midterms create a super majority in the Senate and about 250 right thinking congressmen. The next few years could turn this country around and actually give our offspring hope for a decent future.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, GG said:

 

So, Trump Anxiety Disorder is real, but Trump Derangement Syndrome is fake news?

 

That's the difference between a "disorder" and a "syndrome."

  • Haha (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...