Jump to content

Trump and Russia


Recommended Posts

Today's testimony confirmed that Trump lied about Obama and the British, and that Russia influenced the election by their selective campaign against Clinton to favor Trump. While those facts were already widely known, the biggest news was that the FBI has been investigating the Trump-Russia scandal since July, but didn't disclose it before the election because he "doesn't discuss ongoing investigations". Really? He was willing to comment on the Clinton email investigation (which amounted to nothing) but was politically damaging. It was a clear double standard. He should have disclosed neither, but once he discussed Clinton he should have done the same about Trump and let the voters decide. His double standard only exacerbated the effect of the Russian influence.

 

For the new members here, it saves you a lot of time if, every time you see PastaJoe post something about Trump, you think of this as you're reading it.

 

takeyourhatespeechoutofthiscampus.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

For the new members here, it saves you a lot of time if, every time you see PastaJoe post something about Trump, you think of this as you're reading it.

 

takeyourhatespeechoutofthiscampus.gif

When I saw that it made me instead think of Hammersticks' guilty pleasure. Hope he brings some Kleenex next time he visits PPP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with both of you...............Trump is sure no conservative.................and someone with little control of his mouth,

 

but the cabinet............and the questioning of ALL government spending requirements is long overdue and required someone who has not been a lifelong politician.

 

.

 

This is also a fair point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ROGER KIMBALL: The Nothing Burger Gets Flipped.

It wasn’t quite “Are you now or have you ever been . . .” but it was close. You don’t have to have that good a memory to have found the whole exercise amusing:

 

Democratic politicians abandoning the “1980s asking for its foreign policy back” in order, suddenly, to castigate Russia as a threat to US national security and even (if you can believe it) wrapping themselves in the flag of patriotism (yes, really) to denounce Donald Trump.

 

My own feeling is that the Dems must be very, very worried to go down that street.

 

And what did it all add up to? Nada. Which is to say, rien. Nichts. Zilch. Nothing.

 

 

 

 

Well, it let them look good to their constituencies, and distracted from their inability to stop Gorsuch. So there’s that.

Plus:

 

Was that it? Almost. There actually was one bit of news. If you are looking for a crime in this whole scenario, the one crime we know was committed was when someone “unmasked” Mike Flynn’s name and leaked it to the press in connection with a couple of exchanges he had with the Russian Ambassador. That, as was stressed by Republican interlocutors as well as by James Comey, was a felony punishable by up to 10 years in the slammer.

To my mind, that was the big news of the day. If I were the person who did the leaking, I would not be sleeping so well.

 

 

 

I’m sure the leaker was promised protection. But we all know what promises are worth in DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-trump-faces-his-hardest-truth-he-was-wrong/2017/03/20/af9cabfc-0d83-11e7-9b0d-d27c98455440_story.html?utm_term=.bb95b016b6ea

"There’s a smell of treason in the air,” presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said. “Imagine if J. Edgar Hoover or any other FBI director would have testified against a sitting president? It would have been a mind-
boggling event.”

Brinkley, who has published biographies of such presidents as Gerald Ford, Franklin Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, said of Trump’s start, “This is the most failed first 100 days of any president.”

“To be as low as he is in the polls, in the 30s, while the FBI director is on television saying they launched an investigation into your ties with Russia, I don’t know how it can get much worse,” Brinkley said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I agree with both of you...............Trump is sure no conservative.................and someone with little control of his mouth,

 

but the cabinet............and the questioning of ALL government spending requirements is long overdue and required someone who has not been a lifelong politician.

 

.

And let's see him cut defense spending too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And let's see him cut defense spending too.

 

I didn't say cut for any department...........I said questioning whether or not something is essential

 

 

Certainly Defense should be under the same review.

 

 

However if the total spending on one area goes up, like defense, that doesn't necessarily mean you haven't applied the same standard.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's my opinions and predictions:

 

-Will they come up with enough evidence to prove Russia and Trump colluded? No. I'm guessing it all will be circumstantial.

-Should Trump apologize about baseless accusations of Obama wiretapping Trump tower? Yes. Will he? No.

-Should the intelligent agencies get to the bottom of who leaked classified information? Yes. Will they? No.

-Was their communication between Trump Operatives and Assange about what and when to release hacked DNC emails? Yes. Roger Stone admitted to it and it's why he left campaign early on.

-Did released wikileaks DNC e-mails of Podesta cost Hillary the election? NO. Hillary's reputation was already tarnished enough and rightfully so.

-Do I find it funny the FBI got involved with finding Brady's Superbowl Jerseys? Yes.

FORWARD!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-trump-faces-his-hardest-truth-he-was-wrong/2017/03/20/af9cabfc-0d83-11e7-9b0d-d27c98455440_story.html?utm_term=.bb95b016b6ea

 

"There’s a smell of treason in the air,” presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said. “Imagine if J. Edgar Hoover or any other FBI director would have testified against a sitting president? It would have been a mind-

boggling event.”

 

Brinkley, who has published biographies of such presidents as Gerald Ford, Franklin Roosevelt and Theodore Roosevelt, said of Trump’s start, “This is the most failed first 100 days of any president.”

“To be as low as he is in the polls, in the 30s, while the FBI director is on television saying they launched an investigation into your ties with Russia, I don’t know how it can get much worse,” Brinkley said.

 

 

That's not treason you smell. It's liberal meltdown. Kinda smells like treason, but with more pronounced use of curry and cumin.

 

I particularly liked Maxine Waters tweet today: "Get Ready For Impeachment." :lol:

 

Seriously. Best meltdown ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

That's not treason you smell. It's liberal meltdown. Kinda smells like treason, but with more pronounced use of curry and cumin.

 

I particularly liked Maxine Waters tweet today: "Get Ready For Impeachment." :lol:

 

Seriously. Best meltdown ever.

I'll check back in with you as this thing progresses and see if you still think it's so funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll check back in with you as this thing progresses and see if you still think it's so funny.

 

They can find Trump guilty of treason and embarrassingly hauled away in nothing more than a onesie he borrowed from Pajama Boy, and there will never be a moment when I don't consider the current liberal meltdown the funniest political thing I've watched in my lifetime.

 

A good portion of the comedy comes from hypocrisy, which the left has decided they will embrace at all levels.

 

But it also comes from the benefit of hindsight. I spent probably the first four years of the Obama WH sounding precisely as the left sounds today. I was angry and disappointed at the highest levels of partisan corruption, and was certain...absolutely certain...that someone's head would roll.

 

And guess what? It never did. Do you know why? Because I forgot that even if you make a young, impressionable intern shove a cigar up her vagina while sucking your dick, we'll STILL let you be president.

 

So my advice to you is start doing what the right started doing: taking the fight to the local ballot boxes until you leave the other side with nothing more than...you guessed it...control over the Greater Macungie Utilities Commission...and Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They can find Trump guilty of treason and embarrassingly hauled away in nothing more than a onesie he borrowed from Pajama Boy, and there will never be a moment when I don't consider the current liberal meltdown the funniest political thing I've watched in my lifetime.

 

A good portion of the comedy comes from hypocrisy, which the left has decided they will embrace at all levels.

 

But it also comes from the benefit of hindsight. I spent probably the first four years of the Obama WH sounding precisely as the left sounds today. I was angry and disappointed at the highest levels of partisan corruption, and was certain...absolutely certain...that someone's head would roll.

 

And guess what? It never did. Do you know why? Because I forgot that even if you make a young, impressionable intern shove a cigar up her vagina while sucking your dick, we'll STILL let you be president.

 

So my advice to you is start doing what the right started doing: taking the fight to the local ballot boxes until you leave the other side with nothing more than...you guessed it...control over the Greater Macungie Utilities Commission...and Detroit.

 

 

THIS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

They can find Trump guilty of treason and embarrassingly hauled away in nothing more than a onesie he borrowed from Pajama Boy, and there will never be a moment when I don't consider the current liberal meltdown the funniest political thing I've watched in my lifetime.

 

A good portion of the comedy comes from hypocrisy, which the left has decided they will embrace at all levels.

 

But it also comes from the benefit of hindsight. I spent probably the first four years of the Obama WH sounding precisely as the left sounds today. I was angry and disappointed at the highest levels of partisan corruption, and was certain...absolutely certain...that someone's head would roll.

 

And guess what? It never did. Do you know why? Because I forgot that even if you make a young, impressionable intern shove a cigar up her vagina while sucking your dick, we'll STILL let you be president.

 

So my advice to you is start doing what the right started doing: taking the fight to the local ballot boxes until you leave the other side with nothing more than...you guessed it...control over the Greater Macungie Utilities Commission...and Detroit.

 

Everyone is hypocritical - including you.

Angry at Obama WH because of Clinton/Lewinski...huh?....long time to carry a grudge and those are some distant points to connect

 

If you review Russia trying to manipulate our electoral campaigns and your takeaway is glee over the left "melting down"....says more about you than the left

Edited by baskin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Everyone is hypocritical - including you.

Angry at Obama WH because of Clinton/Lewinski...huh?....long time to carry a grudge and those are some distant points to connect

 

If you review Russia trying to manipulate our electoral campaigns and your takeaway is glee over the left "melting down"....says more about you than the left

 

[This is an automated response.]

 

RIF_Primary_Horizontal.png

 

Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so much hypocrisy on both sides, it's not even funny. The Republican's biggest complaints about HRC were her lying, investigations and corruption. Where are the same complaints about Trump? On the flipside, the Democrats have now become obstructionists after detesting the resistance of the prior eight years.

 

I'm an independent who thinks both sides have some good ideas, and that agreeing to some middle ground is the only long-term solution. A large number of young people like me view this two party, polarized system as an inefficient joke.

 

I'm not trying to call anyone out. I'm just pointing out the ridiculousness on both sides.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is so much hypocrisy on both sides, it's not even funny. The Republican's biggest complaints about HRC were her lying, investigations and corruption. Where are the same complaints about Trump? On the flipside, the Democrats have now become obstructionists after detesting the resistance of the prior eight years.

 

I'm an independent who thinks both sides have some good ideas, and that agreeing to some middle ground is the only long-term solution. A large number of young people like me view this two party, polarized system as an inefficient joke.

 

I'm not trying to call anyone out. I'm just pointing out the ridiculousness on both sides.

Oh pick a side and go with it for God's sake! :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Angry at Obama WH because of Clinton/Lewinski...huh?...

 

Yes. That's exactly what I wrote.

 

Seriously. Is there a part of you that doesn't consider a day complete without someone calling you a dumbass, because sometimes it just seems like you're begging for it.

Edited by LABillzFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this really happening??

 

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson plans to skip a meeting with NATO foreign ministers next month in order to stay home for a visit by China's president and will go to Russia later in April, U.S. officials said on Monday, disclosing an itinerary that allies may see as giving Moscow priority over them.

 

Tillerson intends to miss what would have been his first meeting of the 28 NATO allies on April 5-6 in Brussels so that he can attend President Donald Trump's expected April 6-7 talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, four current and former U.S. officials said.

 

Skipping the NATO meeting and visiting Moscow could risk feeding a perception that Trump may be putting U.S. dealings with big powers first, while leaving waiting those smaller nations that depend on Washington for security, two former U.S. officials said.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-tillerson-idUSKBN16S04I

 

With all that's going on you'd think they might try and look more pro NATO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...