grinreaper Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Kinda hard to keep Russia in the headlines after a week where white supremacists are defended by the president. But fortunately Mueller is quietly doing his job and isn't distracted by Trump's daily blunders. Don't worry, there's plenty to come on the collusion story. Please, show us a concrete example of when Donald trump defended white supremacists.
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Please, show us a concrete example of when Donald trump defended white supremacists. He said some were good people. You forgot that?
grinreaper Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 He said some were good people. You forgot that? He said some people that marched were good people, he didn't say that any white supremacists were good people.
B-Man Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 He said some people that marched were good people, he didn't say that any white supremacists were good people. You are (of course) correct, that is what he said, But to the lemmings like gator, the lying spin is what is believed, not the truth
meazza Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Kinda hard to keep Russia in the headlines after a week where white supremacists are defended by the president. But fortunately Mueller is quietly doing his job and isn't distracted by Trump's daily blunders. Don't worry, there's plenty to come on the collusion story. Sure thing buddy. On Thursday a man ran over people in Barcelona as a terrorist attack and yet CNN still managed to find the time to say, "terrorist attack in Spain, now back to discussions about white supremacists."
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Mueller? Anything yet? No? Nothing? Maybe you could dig into DWS for a bit, sure to be easier.
4merper4mer Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Sure thing buddy. On Thursday a man ran over people in Barcelona as a terrorist attack and yet CNN still managed to find the time to say, "terrorist attack in Spain, now back to discussions about white supremacists." Are you talking about the guy that copycatted Charlottesville?
meazza Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Are you talking about the guy that copycatted Charlottesville? Yes I think so. He was about to try and blow up la segrada familia but decided running people over made more since because of a fat white dude in a city he's never heard of.
grinreaper Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Yes I think so. He was about to try and blow up la segrada familia but decided running people over made more since because of a fat white dude in a city he's never heard of. You Canadians and your use of "c''s instead of "s", not to mention you Italians with your "I"s.
Deranged Rhino Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Kinda hard to keep Russia in the headlines after a week where white supremacists are defended by the president. But fortunately Mueller is quietly doing his job and isn't distracted by Trump's daily blunders. Don't worry, there's plenty to come on the collusion story. Or, more accurately stated: Kinda hard to keep Russia in the headlines when the only news breaking about the investigation is that the DNI was based on falsified evidence. It's hard to keep that in the headlines because so many in the MSM pushed the known (and easy to determine for yourself) lie for seven months with a straight face. You've been had. We all have been. By an overzealous USIC and MiC who wish to prevent the incoming administration from changing America's dangerous and broken agenda of regime change. The very same agenda you protested against for 8 years under W but now you've been convinced to abandon your principles by a bs story concocted by the very same people that lied to you about WMD. The enemy is within. It just isn't in the oval.
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Or, more accurately stated: Kinda hard to keep Russia in the headlines when the only news breaking about the investigation is that the DNI was based on falsified evidence. It's hard to keep that in the headlines because so many in the MSM pushed the known (and easy to determine for yourself) lie for seven months with a straight face. You've been had. We all have been. By an overzealous USIC and MiC who wish to prevent the incoming administration from changing America's dangerous and broken agenda of regime change. The very same agenda you protested against for 8 years under W but now you've been convinced to abandon your principles by a bs story concocted by the very same people that lied to you about WMD. The enemy is within. It just isn't in the oval. But Trump campaign officals did meet with the Russians to influnce the election. How do you turn your brain off like that? Neat trick
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 He said some were good people. You forgot that? Some I imagine were good people. Do you disagree?
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 Some I imagine were good people. Do you disagree? I'm sure you do. Yes
Chef Jim Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 I'm sure you do. Yes So you know for a fact that every one of those alt-right people are bad?
Tiberius Posted August 21, 2017 Posted August 21, 2017 So you know for a fact that every one of those alt-right people are bad? Its a fact,
Tiberius Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Prove it. Its already been proven in the court of public opinion. You are too easy
Chef Jim Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 Its already been proven in the court of public opinion. You are too easy So another gatorfail.
Gary M Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 But Trump campaign officals did meet with the Russians to influnce the election. How do you turn your brain off like that? Neat trick The were invited to a meeting to get information that they were told existed, but in fact didn't. So they are guilty of meeting with a liar. Please tell me the statute that makes that illegal?
Koko78 Posted August 22, 2017 Posted August 22, 2017 The were invited to a meeting to get information that they were told existed, but in fact didn't. So they are guilty of meeting with a liar. Please tell me the statute that makes that illegal? Section 140.24 of the public opinion penal law.
Recommended Posts