Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Russia is kicking out US diplo's.

Will he Veto the Bill only to be outvoted?

 

Putin finally decided to retaliate because he's not getting his return on investment. He did nothing to retaliate when Obama took similar action during the campaign, with the expectation that Trump would lift the sanctions after he took office. Now that the collusion is exposed, Trump can't deliver.

 

Posted

Putin finally decided to retaliate because he's not getting his return on investment. He did nothing to retaliate when Obama took similar action during the campaign, with the expectation that Trump would lift the sanctions after he took office. Now that the collusion is exposed, Trump can't deliver.

 

what collusion? There is zero evidence of it, nada, zip, zilch
Posted (edited)

what collusion? There is zero evidence of it, nada, zip, zilch

 

just wait, they will find some soon!!!!! :bag:

Edited by Gary M
Posted

 

Odd the the Russian response mirror's Obama's orders from back in December.

 

I don't know if you should make a lot out of that. But you certainly can make a lot out of it, if you want to.

Throwing chum to Greggy?

Posted

 

Odd the the Russian response mirror's Obama's orders from back in December.

 

I don't know if you should make a lot out of that. But you certainly can make a lot out of it, if you want to.

True that.

 

What took him so long to react?

Posted (edited)

 

Putin finally decided to retaliate because he's not getting his return on investment. He did nothing to retaliate when Obama took similar action during the campaign, with the expectation that Trump would lift the sanctions after he took office. Now that the collusion is exposed, Trump can't deliver.

 

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/28/week-russia-conspiracy-theory-fell-apart/

 

 

Try again Pasta

Edited by old school
Posted

From your link:

The Russia conspiracy theory so beloved by the media and the Democratic Party fell apart this week — though it was easy to miss, amidst the chaos at the White House and the collapse of Congress’s effort to repeal Obamacare.

Investor William Browder testified at the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday that Fusion GPS, the firm that had been responsible for creating and pushing the so-called “Russia dossier” against Donald Trump, had been paid by the Russian government to push for the repeal of the human rights sanctions in the Magnitsky Act of 2012. In other words, the Russian government may have been paying to smear Trump with false and salacious accusations.

Until now, the media and the Democrats have proceeded under the assumption that Russia intervened in the 2016 election by hacking the email server of the Democratic National Committee, as well as the private email of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta, and releasing their emails via Wikileaks. They have further claimed — with no evidence — that the Trump campaign may have colluded with the Russians in obtaining or releasing the emails.

The entire theory rests on the ridiculous claim that Trump had invited Russia to hack Clinton and the Democrats when he joked last July about the Russians releasing the emails Clinton had deleted from her illicit private server. (The left-wing HuffPost observed Thursday as the anniversary that Trump “asked for Russian help in the election.”) That joke prompted then-CIA director John Brennan to convene an investigation of alleged Russian interference.

In fact, it turns out that Russia may have been trying to undermine Trump. And it may have done so in collusion with the Democrats. The Wall Street Journal‘s Kimberly Strassel noted Thursday that Fusion GPS has ties to the Democrats — and will not reveal who paid it for the dossier. Strassel asked: “What if it was the Democratic National Committee or Hillary Clinton’s campaign?” The money could have passed through intermediaries, she added.

That means the real story of collusion in the 2016 election could be that Democrats were working with Russia. And that would make sense, given their long history of appeasing the Russians, under both Clinton and Barack Obama.

advertisement

Or the truth could be that Russia was trying to embarrass both parties, to weaken the eventual winner. Browder told the Senate Judiciary Committee that it is common for Russia to back both sides in elections, simply to create chaos.

Regardless, the Russia conspiracy theory has now collapsed. There is no evidence that Russia was colluding with the Trump campaign. But there is evidence Russia was working against it. And the truth is only beginning to emerge.

Posted

Trump signs measure to sanction Russia and others for being bad apples. Giuseppe Macaroni says, "Putin's not getting merda for his 'investment' in Trump!"

 

Trump vetoes measure to sanction Russia and others for being bad apples. Giuseppe Macaroni says, "Trump's just Putin's stooge."

Posted

If you read nothing else today, you should read this

 

 

´Collusion´ Collapses: Dem Congressional Espionage Ring Takes Center Ring
American Thinker, by Clarice Feldman

 

Original Article

 

 

 

What if, all this time, Washington and the media have had the Russia collusion story backward? What if it wasn’t the Trump campaign playing footsie with the Vladimir Putin regime, but Democrats? The more we learn about Fusion, the more this seems a possibility.

Posted
FULL OF SCHIFF

 

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff has made himself a leading purveyor of the “collusion” hysteria with which we have been inundated since the election. Schiff is the ranking member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, but he must be tired of life in the House of Representatives. He avidly wants to move on up to the Senate.

Every day it becomes clearer that the “collusion” hysteria is more a function of the Democrats’ “collusion” with the mainstream media than anything else. There is no there there.

The lack of ammo, however, hasn’t slowed Schiff down a bit. According to a tracking report used by the White House, Schiff has done 123 national television interviews totaling more than 14 hours of air time since January.

David Rutz has compiled a supercuts video extracting one motif from Schiff’s many interviews. I don’t want to spoil the suspense. With respect to the tracking of Schiff’s television appearances since January, I will only add Rutz’s note: “Schiff’s office did not respond to a request for comment.”

https://youtu.be/8Dzw6CIvKbw

Posted

Turns out that Trump personally dictated the statement in which Don Jr. misleadingly said he and the Russian lawyer had primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children when they met. This was done on Air Force One, just hours after Trump's private meeting with Putin.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dictated-sons-misleading-statement-on-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/2017/07/31/04c94f96-73ae-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.8f2e6fc72de0

Posted

Turns out that Trump personally dictated the statement in which Don Jr. misleadingly said he and the Russian lawyer had primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children when they met. This was done on Air Force One, just hours after Trump's private meeting with Putin.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dictated-sons-misleading-statement-on-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/2017/07/31/04c94f96-73ae-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.8f2e6fc72de0

 

Big if true!

Posted

Turns out that Trump personally dictated the statement in which Don Jr. misleadingly said he and the Russian lawyer had primarily discussed a program about the adoption of Russian children when they met. This was done on Air Force One, just hours after Trump's private meeting with Putin.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-dictated-sons-misleading-statement-on-meeting-with-russian-lawyer/2017/07/31/04c94f96-73ae-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.8f2e6fc72de0

 

 

RIP TO THE JANUARY 6th DNI REPORT:

 

Over the past few weeks, three pieces of evidence - real evidence, not evidence that relies on unnamed sources citing unnamed methods - have come to light that blow a huge hole in major portions of the "Russian collusion" story's main piece of evidence: The DNI report issued in January of this year. ...

 

But let's ignore the real scandal. That the only "real" evidence offered so far by anyone in positions of actual power was manipulated and altered in an attempt to mislead the American people. Put the partisan ship aside and remember who's the real threat. It's not an orange tinted troll-bot. It's the collusion that's been going on between the USIC and many in the MSM (including that article's very authors) to intentionally stir up not just political unrest in their own country, but to get you to believe Russia is an eminent threat to our way of life.

 

I remember your objections to W's regime change agenda over the years - this narrative is designed to make you forget the fukkery that was afoot then and is still very much afoot now.

×
×
  • Create New...