Deranged Rhino Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 Trump ends CIA's covert mission to arm anti-Assad rebels. http://archive.is/q1vS6 Watch the responses to this story... It'll be viewed as Trump doing a solid for Vlad. The backlash forthcoming from neocons, the DNC, the corporate media and segments of the USIC will be hilarious because they will all leave out the fact (either through ignorance on the part of the DNC masses, or deliberately in the case of the neocons and usic who know better) the groups being armed by this program were ISIS and AQ fighters NOT moderate rebels. Get ready for a major escalation in the mud slinging. More to say on this in the deep state thread...
Tiberius Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 More to say on this in the deep state thread... See ya over there!
Gary M Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 No, it's about corruption. And a secret meeting that the President won't say what was talked about with the guy who tried hacking our election and who also is one of the most corrupt people on earth is suspicious
row_33 Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 This makes no impact on people unless they goosestep to mainstream media panic. A number slashed every week, finally...
reddogblitz Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 No, it's about corruption. And a secret meeting that the President won't say what was talked about with the guy who tried hacking our election and who also is one of the most corrupt people on earth is suspicious What secret meeting?
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 What secret meeting? Exactly. People have gone off the deep end over this ****.
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 What secret meeting? How is he supposed to know? Didn't you read? The meeting was secret.
B-Man Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 How is he supposed to know? Didn't you read? The meeting was secret. He's talking about reports like "Trump and Putin Held a Second, Undisclosed, Private Conversation" in the NYT and "Trump had undisclosed hour-long meeting with Putin at G-20 summit" in The Washington Post. except............... how is a meeting considered ‘previously undisclosed’ if it was reported on by the media on July 8, 2017? "Previously undisclosed" second Trump-Putin meeting at G20... reported on 8 July https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/us-isolated-on-paris-agreement-in-end-of-summit-g20?utm_term=.crBkNdnV6#.ynnWnX9Go … The Gators and Baskins have been played by the media again.
TakeYouToTasker Posted July 19, 2017 Posted July 19, 2017 He's talking about reports like "Trump and Putin Held a Second, Undisclosed, Private Conversation" in the NYT and "Trump had undisclosed hour-long meeting with Putin at G-20 summit" in The Washington Post. except............... how is a meeting considered ‘previously undisclosed’ if it was reported on by the media on July 8, 2017? The Gators and Baskins have been played by the media again. Have your sarcasm meter checked.
B-Man Posted July 20, 2017 Posted July 20, 2017 Have your sarcasm meter checked. I knew what your post was about TYTT, I guess I shouldn't have quoted anyone. The point is that the NYT and WAPO came out with this "2nd meeting" story to whip up the lemmings even though it had already been reported by Buzzfeed a week and a half ago..............
Chef Jim Posted July 20, 2017 Posted July 20, 2017 I've completely tuned out to anything relating to Russia. I've noticed recently many of my liberal friends appear to have as well.
Nanker Posted July 20, 2017 Posted July 20, 2017 No wonder. Who can take hours and hours of this? http://youtu.be/lJWsDjyB36U
B-Man Posted July 21, 2017 Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) CIA Director Mike Pompeo was recently asked about Russian attempts to interfere in the U.S. election, and his response included this: Jim SciuttoVerified account @jimsciutto Follow More Asked if Russia interfered in the US election Pompeo says: "of course..& in the last one, & the one before that & the one before that" 4:41 PM - 20 Jul 2017 That troubled one of the members of The Resistance in the House, Rep. Adam Schiff: Adam SchiffVerified account @RepAdamSchiff Follow More Adam Schiff Retweeted Jim Sciutto Disturbed to see CIA Director trivialize Russian interference in our election. 2016 not comparable to anything in the past. He knows better. If Hillary Clinton had won would Democrats even be talking “Russia” ever hour of every day? And is it “trivializing” the present to say something similar has happened in the past? Funny Liberals..... Edited July 21, 2017 by B-Man
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted July 21, 2017 Posted July 21, 2017 CIA Director Mike Pompeo was recently asked about Russian attempts to interfere in the U.S. election, and his response included this: That troubled one of the members of The Resistance in the House, Rep. Adam Schiff: If Hillary Clinton had won would Democrats even be talking “Russia” ever hour of every day? And is it “trivializing” the present to say something similar has happened in the past? Funny Liberals..... LOCK HIM UP! Not every day, but frequently up to the trials of the Frumps
row_33 Posted July 21, 2017 Posted July 21, 2017 Dems are jealous that Russia favored the GOP for once.
Doc Brown Posted July 21, 2017 Posted July 21, 2017 Dems are jealous that Russia favored the GOP for once. No. I'm pissed off that the Russia narrative ever got started. I'm ticked off that instead of examining the content of the Wikileaks and work on fixing what's wrong with your party they decide to push the narrative that they would of won if it wasn't for Wikileaks/Comey/Russia, etc.. There is going to be an all out war in the Democratic Party between the progressive candidates who don't take corporate money and the more center left politicians that do. It won't be pretty.
26CornerBlitz Posted July 21, 2017 Posted July 21, 2017 Big if true. @washingtonpost Sessions discussed matters related to Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show https://t.co/a9Ke617uaw
Doc Brown Posted July 22, 2017 Posted July 22, 2017 Big if true. @washingtonpost Sessions discussed matters related to Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show https://t.co/a9Ke617uaw Now we know the real reason Comey assumed Sessions would recuse himself IF that article is accurate.
Recommended Posts