Tiberius Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 So I guess you guys are really counting on Russian help. You guys are against our republic? Mueller called what Trump did unpatriotic. How can anyone disagree with that assessment?
Deranged Rhino Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 At the start of the year, according to you, Mueller was supposed to find Trump guilty of treason and put him in jail. Now he's called Trump unpatriotic (though he didn't, Schiff did, but details). That's a BIG fall from where you expected this to wrap up. You got had. Bigly. Still time to course correct, Tibs.
B-Man Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 Did you ever notice that whenever Gator, or several others say: * So I guess.................. * So what you're saying................ * You mean that..................... or something similar, it is ALWAYS a complete 180 degrees away from what you said ? 1
DC Tom Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 38 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So I guess you guys are really counting on Russian help. You guys are against our republic? Mueller called what Trump did unpatriotic. How can anyone disagree with that assessment? Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels. So what you're saying is that Trump isn't a scoundrel, he's...innocent?
Tiberius Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 But we already know this SCHIFF: I’d like to see if we can broaden the aperture at the end of the hearing. From your testimony today, I gather that you believe that knowingly accepting foreign assistance during a presidential campaign is an unethical thing to do. MUELLER: And a crime. SCHIFF: And a crime. MUELLER: And a crime in given circumstances. SCHIFF: And to the degree that it undermines our democracy and institutions, we can agree that it’s also unpatriotic. MUELLER: True. SCHIFF: And wrong. MUELLER: True.
Deranged Rhino Posted July 25, 2019 Posted July 25, 2019 (edited) All that line of questioning does is make the target on Clinton's back bigger. After all, she not only "knowingly accepted foreign assistance during a presidential campaign", she paid for it. Then, through the media, FBI, DOJ, Congress, and CIA, weaponized it during a massive disinformation campaign targeting the American public. Meanwhile, the same probe -- Mueller's probe -- did not find that Trump or his team worked with the Russians or aided their efforts. Boomerangs can be dangerous. Edited July 25, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 1
B-Man Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 Judge dismisses DNC hacking lawsuit against Trump team, says claims ‘entirely divorced from the facts' Original Article A federal judge in frank terms Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they "did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place" and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information. The ruling came as Democrats increasingly have sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts. The judge was appointed by Bill Clinton 2
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 23 minutes ago, B-Man said: Judge dismisses DNC hacking lawsuit against Trump team, says claims ‘entirely divorced from the facts' Original Article A federal judge in frank terms Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they "did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place" and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information. The ruling came as Democrats increasingly have sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts. The judge was appointed by Bill Clinton This is a bigger deal than the media (who's not covering it much at all) are letting people know. I understand people not liking Trump. Truly. What I don't understand is the people who allow that dislike of Trump to let them turn a blind eye to a coup attempt by their own intelligence services. Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election to the degree our own government did. But, because the NPC programming is so strong in some, they can't admit this. It's going to be fun times ahead. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 Pushing, now long debunked Trump/Russia collusion prop just shows how dishonest and partisan you are.
njbuff Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Pushing, now long debunked Trump/Russia collusion prop just shows how dishonest and partisan you are. Leftists/morons (whatever you wanna call them) just will not let it go. Just shows how intellectually dishonest these parasites are. Edited July 31, 2019 by njbuff
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted July 31, 2019 Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Pushing, now long debunked Trump/Russia collusion prop just shows how dishonest and partisan you are. ...I'm confused...what politician in their right mind would cozy up to Russia or China, our arch enemies #1 and 1A, vying for world supremacy?.....seriously?......China backs North Korea to keep the peninsula in turmoil because of relationships with Japan & South Korea......Russia aids and abets Iran and Syria to churn the Middle East because of our friendship with Israel...what the hell did I miss?......Hilary-uranium deal, Obama-$100 billion "olive branch" to Iran?....and no answers?......Mueller should be on BOTH now that he has some time available..... Edited July 31, 2019 by OldTimeAFLGuy
Recommended Posts