DC Tom Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Careful, last time the White House attempted to float that line of thought the Attorney General had to recuse himself [This is an automated response.] I'm not stupid. Yes, yes you are. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 [This is an automated response.] Yes, yes you are. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. And Tom rolls off the cot for his first drink of the day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 And Tom rolls off the cot for his first drink of the day... [This is an automated response.] You're an idiot. Created by DC Tom-bot, beta version 0.7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Yes. But everyone has to be absolutely, positively, 100% certain for a fact before any other business of the government can proceed. I wonder what this witch hunt is costing the taxpayers. That's a lot of government assets being used on this one issue. The House Select Committee on Benghazi alone cost $6.8 million of taxpayers money. And that was just one of 10 congressional committees investigating Benghazi. So yeah, there's a precedent for witch hunts on one issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 When are the DNC and intelligence services going to learn that you can't protect with a blackberry or commodore 64 and minimal firewall/security protection? When are the DNC and intelligence services going to learn that you can't protect with a blackberry or commodore 64 and minimal firewall/security protection? The House Select Committee on Benghazi alone cost $6.8 million of taxpayers money. And that was just one of 10 congressional committees investigating Benghazi. So yeah, there's a precedent for witch hunts on one issue. Don't you need a witch to form a witch hunt? Who would be a good witch? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 When are the DNC and intelligence services going to learn that you can't protect with a blackberry or commodore 64 and minimal firewall/security protection? When are the DNC and intelligence services going to learn that you can't protect with a blackberry or commodore 64 and minimal firewall/security protection? Don't you need a witch to form a witch hunt? Who would be a good witch? Not Mitch McConnell. Pretty sure he weighs more than a duck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not Mitch McConnell. Pretty sure he weighs more than a duck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Miner Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not Mitch McConnell. Pretty sure he weighs more than a duck. Like a mallard? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Did I miss the big report with the specific details that (was it...) 9 intelligence agencies were going to deliver by now? Seemed like the headlines boasted it was coming forth for about 21 straight days. So basically illegal (totally illegal) wiretaps are all they have for some petty nonsense and casual discussions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 (edited) The House Select Committee on Benghazi alone cost $6.8 million of taxpayers money. And that was just one of 10 congressional committees investigating Benghazi. So yeah, there's a precedent for witch hunts on one issue. It was well worth it. It exposed Hillary as the fraud that she is and was a factor in her not winning the election. The return on the investment is already yuuuuggge. Oh and it didn't cost taxpayers a dime. It's being financed and the money needed to pay the interest is also being financed. Edited March 8, 2017 by keepthefaith Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 Not Mitch McConnell. Pretty sure he weighs more than a duck. Yeah, but his body language definitely suggests that he might be made of wood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peezy Posted March 8, 2017 Share Posted March 8, 2017 (edited) Not Mitch McConnell. Pretty sure he weighs more than a duck. you talking about turtle boy? This Russian story/narrative sounds like an episode of 24 where the Russians are set up as the bad guys but aren't and it is revealed around episode 8, that the bad guys are somebody else entirely. This It's the terrible Russians "story" has always smelled. if calling them a racist doesn't work, blame it on the Russians Edited March 8, 2017 by Peezy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hank II Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 The House Select Committee on Benghazi alone cost $6.8 million of taxpayers money. And that was just one of 10 congressional committees investigating Benghazi. So yeah, there's a precedent for witch hunts on one issue. That 6.8M spent was a key factor in her not being elected. Money well spent! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 9, 2017 Share Posted March 9, 2017 The House Select Committee on Benghazi alone cost $6.8 million of taxpayers money. And that was just one of 10 congressional committees investigating Benghazi. So yeah, there's a precedent for witch hunts on one issue. Just like a Democrat to complain about money being spent on something other than making Americans more dependent on the government. "IIlegal immigrants don't have enough to eat, and you want to spend millions of dollars to find out why we left three American soldiers and a US Ambassador for dead after blaming a Youtube video in order to make it to a fund raiser in Vegas?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Congressional investigations are in full swing! I was stationed at Langely in the 80's http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/trump-russia-investigation-cia-intelligence-235774 I was there 2002-2004. Than Quantico 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 (edited) The Sudden Public Skepticism About Trump-Russian Collusion FTA: Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation.Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445666/sudden-public-skepticism-about-trump-russian-collusion Edited March 10, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 The Sudden Public Skepticism About Trump-Russian Collusion FTA: Even some Democrats on the Intelligence Committee now quietly admit, after several briefings and preliminary inquiries, they don’t expect to find evidence of active, informed collusion between the Trump campaign and known Russian intelligence operatives, though investigators have only just begun reviewing raw intelligence. Among the Intelligence Committee’s rank and file, there’s a tangible frustration over what one official called “wildly inflated” expectations surrounding the panel’s fledgling investigation. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/445666/sudden-public-skepticism-about-trump-russian-collusion Shocking... It's almost as if the CIA has the ability to make their hacking tools look as if it came from Russia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Talking with Russia is like invoking Satan. You do not converse with the dark prince, lest ye be burned at the stake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Talking with Russia is like invoking Satan. You do not converse with the dark prince, lest ye be burned at the stake. Unless you give him a reset button. Then it's okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Unless you give him a reset button. Then it's okay. Until everyone realizes you weren't competent enough as Secretary of Freaking State to find a single person capable of accurately translating to Russian the word "Reset." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts