fansince88 Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Were we a run first offense due to QB? That is the big question for on days when running was not working results were not good.we were run first due to Rex's plans.
transient Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Break it down for us Einstein. That's not how it works. As you can plainly see by his screen name, someone must first do the heavy lifting of enlightening before he can come along and re-enlighten. Unless the absence of the hyphen indicates "regarding" as opposed to the prefix re-, in which case WTF does "regarding enlightener" mean... actually, skip it... I don't really care...
iinii Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 The guy is a horrible writer. I will now predict Rodak's analysis go BUF/NE QB moves: If TT is gone....terrible choice by the Bills If TT stays.....terrible choice by the Bills If JG is traded.....amazing value gained by Patriots If JG stays....Pats wise to keep JG as backup plan One must hedge one's bets.
BADOLBILZ Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 http://www.espn.com/blog/buffalo-bills/post/_/id/27374/what-to-know-about-bills-looming-decision-on-tyrod-taylor Nice analysis by Mike Rodak. Especially damning are how horrible he is in pressure situations for a running QB. No Rodak just wanted to make sure he put as much negative in as he could come up with to counter any positive. How about scoring?......redzone TD scoring?.......the fact that a lot of his sacks were basically tackles for loss as a runner and not the turnover-inducing struck from behind type?......his impact on the running game beyond his own yardage? The fact that it's a close call without even looking at the intangibles should be telling.
bills in oregon Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Were we a run first offense due to QB? That is the big question for on days when running was not working results were not good. Who did you want TT to throw too?
Maury Ballstein Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Who did you want TT to throw too? The professional WRs who play at the most elite level of football ?
TheFunPolice Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 The minute he's a former Bill he will be the "best QB on the FA market" and a great pickup for someone... 2 Pro Bowls etc.
Like A Mofo Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Im not a fan of Rodak but the numbers here don't lie: The late game numbers for Tyrod are alarming and really should be the determining factor to tell TT thanks, but no thanks.
hondo in seattle Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 As Brock Osweiler proved last year, the market for flawed QBs in the NFL is amazingly hot. Even mid-tier QBs are worth a lot of money. Teams with bottom-tier QBs will pay a lot to snatch up someone like Tyrod up if he was a FA. Until we draft and groom his replacement, I think we need to keep Taylor. Some worry about Taylor's cap hit. It's called the cost of doing business. While Taylor's cap number does prevent us from signing a high profile FA QB (who would we want, anyway?), it does not preclude us from drafting and grooming a QB. While I see the flaws in Taylor's game, like the ones Rodak mentions, I don't see a compelling alternative.
Tcali Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 I think we can walk and chew gum at the same time. TT is a great athlete and a great football talent but a mediocre to average QB. TT can't maintain his cool in the pocket and can't quickly look to the 2nd and 3rd receivers. TT doesn't turn the ball over a lot. TT is a spectacular runner. TT is good enough for us to get into the playoffs if we have good coaching. TT will never take us to the promised land because of his significant QB skill limitations TT should be retained so we dont go 6-10 with some horrible recycled mediocre QB or some awful rookie or the skeletal fracture waiting to happen from dallas.
BillsFanForever19 Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 Not being a fan of Rodak doesn't change the statistics. Or the simple eye test. How anyone can watch Taylor as a passer and want him back is completely beyond me.
Southern Bills Fan Posted February 10, 2017 Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) Not being a fan of Rodak doesn't change the statistics. Or the simple eye test. How anyone can watch Taylor as a passer and want him back is completely beyond me. It doesn't always look good and yes, it looks downright bad sometimes, however, 7th in scoring at 26 points a game in his starts last year i believe. Who can we bring in to IMPROVE on that then? Edited February 10, 2017 by Southern Bills Fan
BaaadThingsMan Posted February 11, 2017 Posted February 11, 2017 Not being a fan of Rodak doesn't change the statistics. Or the simple eye test. How anyone can watch Taylor as a passer and want him back is completely beyond me.fans of other teams think tt is amazing and bills fans are crazy for not wanting him
Big Gun Posted February 11, 2017 Posted February 11, 2017 (edited) 2 Pro Bowl invites That's comedy right there! Edited February 11, 2017 by old school
CardinalScotts Posted February 11, 2017 Posted February 11, 2017 The guy is a horrible writer. I will now predict Rodak's analysis go BUF/NE QB moves: If TT is gone....terrible choice by the Bills If TT stays.....terrible choice by the Bills If JG is traded.....amazing value gained by Patriots If JG stays....Pats wise to keep JG as backup plan nailed it...im suprised people these days STILL go to ESPN for info like its 1987
Recommended Posts