Prickly Pete Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 they're both the same thing, you nitwit. the real talk generation is too young to vote and yet to be indoctrinated in the school system farce we have and the incredible colleges we support. those 15-25 now are so fully caught up in the rights of everyone that they forget their own rights and those whom are not marching and crying. They will be in 8 years. Also, there will doubtlessly be lots more terrorist acts and rapes throughout Europe in the coming years, for voters to reflect on. Add that the Democratic Party is eating itself, and that lots of the Sixties boomers won't be around to vote.
boyst Posted February 3, 2017 Posted February 3, 2017 They will be in 8 years. Also, there will doubtlessly be lots more terrorist acts and rapes throughout Europe in the coming years, for voters to reflect on. Add that the Democratic Party is eating itself, and that lots of the Sixties boomers won't be around to vote. in 8 years they will be 18-24ish. they won't vote. they never vote at that age.
Meathead Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 they're both the same thing, you nitwit. you seeeriously need a sarcasm meter calibration They will be in 8 years. idk man. seems like epic miracle proportions that don will survive even a single term without seriously damaging his presidential brand. and right or wrong that always leads back to the party brand. snarky toms point of very few seats available for dem flips might magnify the voters zeal for a swing back away from the right via the next executive election. thats what i would be ѕhitting in my boots about if i was a republican politician. one term. woo fkg hoo. and now with a tattered brand that seems waaay more likely to me. but wtf who knows. maybe don will surprise me. hahahhahahahaaa. wait let me try again
Dr.Sack Posted February 4, 2017 Author Posted February 4, 2017 (edited) This just in, Boeing SC is doing a multimillionaire ad buy to defeat unionization efforts by the International Machinists Union. Imagine what a big defeat this would be to big bad Boeing. Edited February 4, 2017 by Dr.Sack
unbillievable Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 It is an empirical fact that right to work state workers make 3.2% less or $1500 less per year. This should be interesting and put Trump at odds with the neoliberal recalcitrant GOP old guard. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gop-introduces-national-right-to-work-legislation/article/2613428 Are those the same blue states where rent is $4,000/month? It always make me laugh when liberals bring up that blue states workers make more than red state workers. Enjoy that 100sq/foot studio apartment Snowflake.
/dev/null Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 It is an empirical fact that right to work state workers make 3.2% less or $1500 less per year. This should be interesting and put Trump at odds with the neoliberal recalcitrant GOP old guard. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gop-introduces-national-right-to-work-legislation/article/2613428 With all due respect and any copyright royalties to Chef Jim... I'll take why Leftists still haven't figured why they lost in November for $1000..... Got nothing to do with the old school Labor vs Capital, Worker vs Management, Proletariat vs Burgouise,Us vs Them model that Lefties have been drooling over since Marx thru Pikkety,
Dr.Sack Posted February 4, 2017 Author Posted February 4, 2017 (edited) I see a lot of commenters on here keep on regurgitating Chicago school neoliberal establishmentarian economics. Have we really digressed into an era where empirical evidentiary facts are dismissed as "political"? If climate change is real, and it is as confirmed by 99% of all scientists & even the NSA & the CIA agree, then can we also use empirical data which clearly show right to work state workers make 3.2% less? That is a fact. Let's debate in a fact based world. If you don't like opinions, fine. But come with facts. It should be also pointed out that private sector union membership is near a 100 year old low. The correlation & causation can be blamed on many factors, but there can be no denying the fact that Trump WON the vast majority of private sector union workers in the mid west. Why not embrace this new coalition instead of attacking it? Edited February 4, 2017 by Dr.Sack
Meathead Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 unions certainly have made their own beds that has led to a dramatic drop in their own relevancy but lets not forget why unions became popular and functional in the first place. if we swing the pendulum back too far we quite possibly could reopen the door to overt employee exploitation in whatever forms that would take. so balance as usual is probably key here
Nanker Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 Proud Boys https://twitter.com/GorillaRadio_Tv/status/827393757108588548 She's Rebecca Goyette and she's been doing this kind of schtick for quite awhile. She's truly unbalanced as is her troupe of useful idiots she performs with. They're poster children for the Democrat party of the 21st Century. http://archive.is/7cqFd Here she lets her freaky out in Zappaesque fantasies: http://www.rebogallery.com
FireChan Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 I see a lot of commenters on here keep on regurgitating Chicago school neoliberal establishmentarian economics. Have we really digressed into an era where empirical evidentiary facts are dismissed as "political"? If climate change is real, and it is as confirmed by 99% of all scientists & even the NSA & the CIA agree, then can we also use empirical data which clearly show right to work state workers make 3.2% less? That is a fact. Let's debate in a fact based world. If you don't like opinions, fine. But come with facts. It should be also pointed out that private sector union membership is near a 100 year old low. The correlation & causation can be blamed on many factors, but there can be no denying the fact that Trump WON the vast majority of private sector union workers in the mid west. Why not embrace this new coalition instead of attacking it? Confirmed by 99% of scientists. Lol.
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 I see a lot of commenters on here keep on regurgitating Chicago school neoliberal establishmentarian economics. Have we really digressed into an era where empirical evidentiary facts are dismissed as "political"? If climate change is real, and it is as confirmed by 99% of all scientists & even the NSA & the CIA agree, then can we also use empirical data which clearly show right to work state workers make 3.2% less? That is a fact. Let's debate in a fact based world. If you don't like opinions, fine. But come with facts. It should be also pointed out that private sector union membership is near a 100 year old low. The correlation & causation can be blamed on many factors, but there can be no denying the fact that Trump WON the vast majority of private sector union workers in the mid west. Why not embrace this new coalition instead of attacking it? That's not a fact, it's an average that stomps facts into mush until they're indistinguishable from dogma.
Dr.Sack Posted February 4, 2017 Author Posted February 4, 2017 That's not a fact, it's an average that stomps facts into mush until they're indistinguishable from dogma. Show me the climate scientists who say the earth isn't warming, and I'll show you an Exxon Mobil shill. We've saw this before with Big Tobacco buying off medical doctors and suppressing facts that tobacco causes cancer.
IDBillzFan Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 (edited) Show me the climate scientists who say the earth isn't warming, and I'll show you an Exxon Mobil shill. We've saw this before with Big Tobacco buying off medical doctors and suppressing facts that tobacco causes cancer. I have an idea: let's stop giving billions of dollars in federal funds to everyone who says the earth is warming, and let's see how many 'scientists' are still worried about global warming cooling climate change. I suspect there will suddenly be an influx in 'crowd scientists.' Edited February 4, 2017 by LABillzFan
DC Tom Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 Show me the climate scientists who say the earth isn't warming, and I'll show you an Exxon Mobil shill. We've saw this before with Big Tobacco buying off medical doctors and suppressing facts that tobacco causes cancer. 1) I was talking about your bull **** wage comparison. 2) Clown question, bro. Your definition of "climate scientist" excludes anyone who says the earth isn't warming. It's unanswerable.
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 (edited) Show me the climate scientists who say the earth isn't warming, and I'll show you an Exxon Mobil shill. We've saw this before with Big Tobacco buying off medical doctors and suppressing facts that tobacco causes cancer. I'll consider taking global warming climate change alarmism a bit more seriously once the zealots start proposing solution that address, you know... global warming climate change, as opposed to a massive global wealth redistribution scheme. Edited February 4, 2017 by TakeYouToTasker
IDBillzFan Posted February 4, 2017 Posted February 4, 2017 I'll consider taking global warming climate change alarmism a bit more seriously once the zealots start proposing solution that address, you know... global warming climate change, as opposed to a massive global wealth redistribution scheme. Now, now...we have those cool twistie light bulbs that cost $18 a bulb, but sometimes they last a whole two months. And don't forget the global shift once we finished the Cash for Clunkers programs. I can feel the globe cooling as I type this.
Dr.Sack Posted February 5, 2017 Author Posted February 5, 2017 (edited) Now, now...we have those cool twistie light bulbs that cost $18 a bulb, but sometimes they last a whole two months. And don't forget the global shift once we finished the Cash for Clunkers programs. I can feel the globe cooling as I type this. The last project I worked on removed 220,000 kWh a year from the customers electric usage or the equivalency of 164,000 pounds of coal burned in one year. That's a CO2 reduction of 155 metric tons. Smoking doesn't cause cancer says 1 "doctor" out of 100. So D.C. Tom & LA Bills fan start smoking. Edited February 5, 2017 by Dr.Sack
B-Man Posted February 5, 2017 Posted February 5, 2017 Back at the thread............. GOP Introduces Right To Work Legislation Reps. Joe Wilson of South Carolina and Steve King of Iowa are sponsoring the legislation, which would amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act to prohibit what unions call "security clauses." These are provisions that permit union-management contracts that require all employees to join a union or pay one a regular fee as a condition of employme (Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ... Kentucky Becomes Nation's 27th Right-to-Work State [Michigan ... https://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/kentucky-becomes-nations-27th-right-t...
Greg F Posted February 5, 2017 Posted February 5, 2017 The last project I worked on removed 220,000 kWh a year from the customers electric usage ... How long did it take you to change all those light bulbs? Smoking doesn't cause cancer says 1 "doctor" out of 100. So D.C. Tom & LA Bills fan start smoking. You no doubt would have jumped right on the Eugenics bandwagon.
DC Tom Posted February 5, 2017 Posted February 5, 2017 (edited) The last project I worked on removed 220,000 kWh a year from the customers electric usage or the equivalency of 164,000 pounds of coal burned in one year. That's a CO2 reduction of 155 metric tons. Smoking doesn't cause cancer says 1 "doctor" out of 100. So D.C. Tom & LA Bills fan start smoking. You truly don't know a goddamn thing I think about the subject. And your math is wrong, you retard. And no one was talking about global warming in this thread anyway. You ever going to get back to the subject of the thread you started? Edited February 5, 2017 by DC Tom
Recommended Posts