bobobonators Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Cowboys SS Barry Church told a Dallas radio station that Tony Romo played "like 2014 Romo" in late-season practices. He looked great back there," Church said. "He was dropping some dimes, some serious dimes against the No. 1 defense. We went against him on 7-on-7 drills." Church said he would answer "Yeah, go get him," if asked by a quarterback-needy team whether Romo was worth pursuing. - Dallas morning news
BADOLBILZ Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Cowboys SS Barry Church told a Dallas radio station that Tony Romo played "like 2014 Romo" in late-season practices. He looked great back there," Church said. "He was dropping some dimes, some serious dimes against the No. 1 defense. We went against him on 7-on-7 drills." Church said he would answer "Yeah, go get him," if asked by a quarterback-needy team whether Romo was worth pursuing. - Dallas morning news Brett Favre looks good when nobody is hitting him in those copper fit commercials............and he hasn't had 6 separate bone breaks/fractures in the past 6 years.....just a thought.
Beef Jerky Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 If the Bills get Romo they should draft a WR. Sammy and a new guy with Woods and Clay should work... Oh yea SHADY.
GunnerBill Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Brett Favre looks good when nobody is hitting him in those copper fit commercials............and he hasn't had 6 separate bone breaks/fractures in the past 6 years.....just a thought. Sign Brett Favre? We have had worse ideas.....
4merper4mer Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Brett Favre looks good when nobody is hitting him in those copper fit commercials............and he hasn't had 6 separate bone breaks/fractures in the past 6 years.....just a thought. OMG Favre sucked for about 6 years before he retired. He is NOT coming back.
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Cowboys SS Barry Church told a Dallas radio station that Tony Romo played "like 2014 Romo" in late-season practices. He looked great back there," Church said. "He was dropping some dimes, some serious dimes against the No. 1 defense. We went against him on 7-on-7 drills." Church said he would answer "Yeah, go get him," if asked by a quarterback-needy team whether Romo was worth pursuing. - Dallas morning news 7-on-7
dave mcbride Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 OMG Favre sucked for about 6 years before he retired. He is NOT coming back. Except for the fact that 2009 was one of the two or three best seasons of his entire career ...
Maury Ballstein Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 Dropping dimes. Lol Tony Romo is 133 and 80. He drops dimes often.
Andrew Son Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) @247sports Tony Romos perfect fit is with #Bills; rest of NFL must move on »via @247KevinBoilard http://dal.247sports.com/Bolt/Tony-Romos-perfect-fit-is-with-Bills-rest-of-NFL-must-move-on-51284416 Get me Romo, Corey Davis and a top FA RT and lets go! Edited February 16, 2017 by SWATeam
Andrew Son Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 There's no doubting Romos skill as a QB. But why is it so hard to comprehend that he is made of glass at this point? Trading for him will blow up in our faces. To me it's a calculated risk. Maybe you catch lightning in a bottle and he stays healthy for a year? If not what is the worst that can happen? We suck like always?
aristocrat Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 To me it's a calculated risk. Maybe you catch lightning in a bottle and he stays healthy for a year? If not what is the worst that can happen? We suck like always? could get some huge production out of the offense! from 9 to 1. Grab a safety at 10...i wouldnt go wr. i'd grab a cheap wr in FA
Santana Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 That's just what Buffalo needs a 36 year old QB who can't stay healthy.....oh yeah and he costs $20,000,000.00/YR
Tommy Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 (edited) That's just what Buffalo needs a 36 year old QB who can't stay healthy.....oh yeah and he costs $20,000,000.00/YR If traded to a new team, Tony Romo would only cost $14 million (his base salary) against the cap for his new team. He would be owed a base salary of $19.5m in 2018 and $20.5m in 2019, however, none of that is guaranteed, so he could be released with zero dead cap hit. Essentially, a trade for Romo would be like a one year "prove it" deal for $14m, with a team option (year to year) for the next two seasons, with zero dead money if released at any time. It would certainly be a calculated risk, as no one can say with 100% certainty that he will or will not stay healthy. I'm not sure the Cowboys will be willing to eat all of his dead money in 2017 however, so I think it's more likely that he is designated a post-June 1st release. For the Cowboys it's really about the decision between receiving compensation and the ability to spread his cap hit over two years. Edited February 16, 2017 by Tommy
ndirish1978 Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 If traded to a new team, Tony Romo would only cost $14 million (his base salary) against the cap for his new team. He would be owed a base salary of $19.5m in 2018 and $20.5m in 2019, however, none of that is guaranteed, so he could be released with zero dead cap hit. Essentially, a trade for Romo would be like a one year "prove it" deal for $14m, with a team option (year to year) for the next two seasons, with zero dead money if released at any time. It would certainly be a calculated risk, as no one can say with 100% certainty that he will or will not stay healthy. I'm not sure the Cowboys will be willing to eat all of his dead money in 2017 however, so I think it's more likely that he is designated a post-June 1st release. For the Cowboys it's really about the decision between receiving compensation and the ability to spread his cap hit over two years. The guy is SUCH an injury risk that you just can't rely on him playing for that entire year at only 14M
BADOLBILZ Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 If traded to a new team, Tony Romo would only cost $14 million (his base salary) against the cap for his new team. He would be owed a base salary of $19.5m in 2018 and $20.5m in 2019, however, none of that is guaranteed, so he could be released with zero dead cap hit. Essentially, a trade for Romo would be like a one year "prove it" deal for $14m, with a team option (year to year) for the next two seasons, with zero dead money if released at any time. It would certainly be a calculated risk, as no one can say with 100% certainty that he will or will not stay healthy. I'm not sure the Cowboys will be willing to eat all of his dead money in 2017 however, so I think it's more likely that he is designated a post-June 1st release. For the Cowboys it's really about the decision between receiving compensation and the ability to spread his cap hit over two years. Yeah cap-wise it's very do-able. It's just that much of the success of this Buffalo offense has been predicated around having a run-pass-run option at QB..........changing to Romo requires some improvements to the OL and WR corps.......moves they don't really HAVE to make with Tyrod......he put up points with no WR and Jordan Mills allowing a constant assault on him. Is it really in the best interest to also pay $6M-$8M each for a RT and Bob Woods in FA? And then you have to keep your fingers crossed because Romo has had 6 separate bone breaks and fractures(and surgery for herniated disc in back) since 2010......including breaking the same point on his collar bone twice in one season and 3 times in that span. An important point about Romo is that this is a guy who is going to take hits. He tries to keep plays alive and put the ball downfield. That is his nature. This isn't going to be Peyton Manning going entire games in Denver without taking a hit on his one career injury(neck). This is much riskier from an availability perspective.
Andrew Son Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 The guy is SUCH an injury risk that you just can't rely on him playing for that entire year at only 14M That would be true if there was an abundance of other options. Show me a franchise guy that becomes available without having risks/question marks. Like I said, it is basically a lotto ticket Yeah cap-wise it's very do-able. It's just that much of the success of this Buffalo offense has been predicated around having a run-pass-run option at QB..........changing to Romo requires some improvements to the OL and WR corps.......moves they don't really HAVE to make with Tyrod......he put up points with no WR and Jordan Mills allowing a constant assault on him. Is it really in the best interest to also pay $6M-$8M each for a RT and Bob Woods in FA? And then you have to keep your fingers crossed because Romo has had 6 separate bone breaks and fractures(and surgery for herniated disc in back) since 2010......including breaking the same point on his collar bone twice in one season and 3 times in that span. An important point about Romo is that this is a guy who is going to take hits. He tries to keep plays alive and put the ball downfield. That is his nature. This isn't going to be Peyton Manning going entire games in Denver without taking a hit on his one career injury(neck). This is much riskier from an availability perspective. That is a great point. Can he adapt? maybe. He does run an absolutely beautiful play action fake.
YoloinOhio Posted February 16, 2017 Posted February 16, 2017 @edwerderESPN Source says Tony Romo expecting release, not trade, and believes he can start as #NFL QB 2-3 more seasons despite turning 37, injury history
Recommended Posts