Azalin Posted April 14, 2017 Posted April 14, 2017 Free Ben & Jerry's? He's got my vote. So nuts weren't good enough - Ben and Jerry's is adding flakes to their ice cream now?
grinreaper Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 Free Ben & Jerry's? He's got my vote. Sure, if you want a product past its expiration date.
grinreaper Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 (edited) Tutti frutti Half-Baked Froyo Edited April 15, 2017 by grinreaper
Benjamin Franklin Posted April 15, 2017 Posted April 15, 2017 (edited) Free Ben & Jerry's? He's got my vote. Better platform than I heard in November. I'm in. Edited April 15, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin
B-Man Posted April 17, 2017 Posted April 17, 2017 This morning, Neil Gorsuch asked his first questions as a Supreme Court Justice Reporting at SCOTUSblog, Amy Howe stresses how strongly Gorsuch displayed his commitment to texualism: Chris Landau was the first attorney... on the receiving end of Gorsuch’s first question as a justice. Exactly what part, Gorsuch wanted to know, of the federal statute at issue provided for the path that Landau was advocating? Landau started to respond by pointing to a Supreme Court case, but he didn’t get far before Gorsuch interrupted him to focus again on what he described as “the plain language” of the statute. A few minutes later, Landau sought to reassure the justices that his client was not asking the Supreme Court to “break new ground” with its ruling. But Gorsuch again seemed skeptical, suggesting that what Landau was in fact asking the justices to do was to “just continue to make it up.”... Gorsuch [asked Brian Fletcher, the assistant to the U.S. solicitor general... whether it wouldn’t “be a lot easier” if we just followed the plain language of the statute. And when Fletcher started to outline the reasons underlying the government’s position, Gorsuch pressed Fletcher to explain “where” in the statute the government’s proposed rule found support. Thank you President Trump.
row_33 Posted April 17, 2017 Posted April 17, 2017 A Justice that won't ask "how can deliver a ruling such that the biggest freaks on Phil Donanhue's show would have recoiled in horror..." ?
row_33 Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 Since Nixon the GOP loves to send up stealth candidates that appear conservative but end up siding with the liberals their whole tenure. Souter was a brilliant facade.
TakeYouToTasker Posted May 12, 2017 Posted May 12, 2017 Rumors of Supreme Court vacancy spark liberal panic. This would be fantastic.
KD in CA Posted May 13, 2017 Posted May 13, 2017 Since Nixon the GOP loves to send up stealth candidates that appear conservative but end up siding with the liberals their whole tenure. Souter was a brilliant facade. Bush screwed the pooch big time on that one.
Recommended Posts