Benjamin Franklin Posted February 8, 2017 Author Posted February 8, 2017 Is that better or worse than deciding based on a Katy Perry concert? Who decided based on a Katy Perry concert? Good soundbyte though.
Deranged Rhino Posted February 8, 2017 Posted February 8, 2017 Who decided based on a Katy Perry concert? Good soundbyte though. Yeah, not like she was a go to celeb for the Clinton campaign.
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 8, 2017 Author Posted February 8, 2017 Yeah, not like she was a go to celeb for the Clinton campaign. Of course she was. And if I'd voted for Clinton suckincincy...err...Jim might have a point.
Chef Jim Posted February 8, 2017 Posted February 8, 2017 Of course she was. And if I'd voted for Clinton suckincincy...err...Jim might have a point. So that's what it would take for my point to be valid? It's "Elite" !@#$s like you that have validated my point.
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 8, 2017 Author Posted February 8, 2017 (edited) So that's what it would take for my point to be valid? It's "Elite" !@#$s like you that have validated my point. You tried to make a point that I voted for Clinton because I took my teen daughter and friends to see Perry. But you were wrong. Again. I appreciate the nomination for elite status. But of course it was Hillary's arrogance towards her deplorables that lost her the election. She certainly lost by living a n her **** elite bubble. Calling mid America dumb and treating them that way is despicable and supports the best arguments for the electoral college. Don't confuse me calling my you an angry old man who cast his vote carelessly with how I feel about middle America. Edited February 8, 2017 by Benjamin Franklin
4merper4mer Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 Who decided based on a Katy Perry concert? Good soundbyte though. But Jim decided based on Kardashian because you said?
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 President Trump will attack anyone including the family of a war hero but he won't say one bad word about Putin. Definitely NSFW: http://PoliticalSculptor.com You can see the whole Trump-Putin love affair here, sculpted out... If you don't mind throwing vinegar on your eyes. Holy dear Lord... Note to Trump: you may not want to get talented (totally subjective word) artists too mad! Oh... He must be a Tommy Cheatriot hater too... ;-) Yikes!
keepthefaith Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 Yeah, not like she was a go to celeb for the Clinton campaign. Waste of a great rack.
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 9, 2017 Author Posted February 9, 2017 But Jim decided based on Kardashian because you said? He voted for Trump on a whim. I didn't vote for Clinton. In any event, I shouldn't have attacked Jim personally. Sorry Jim.
Nanker Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 Yeah. There's enough **** flying around here with the azzholes who don't know how to get along and have civil discourses without people that know better start slinging **** too.
meazza Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 (edited) Waste of a great rack. . She would be able to get me to do anything. Edited February 9, 2017 by meazza
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 9, 2017 Author Posted February 9, 2017 Yeah. There's enough **** flying around here with the azzholes who don't know how to get along and have civil discourses without people that know better start slinging **** too. I know better but I'm as much an !@#$ as anyone and sometimes more. Yeah. There's enough **** flying around here with the azzholes who don't know how to get along and have civil discourses without people that know better start slinging **** too. I know better but I'm as much an !@#$ as anyone and sometimes more.
Benjamin Franklin Posted February 9, 2017 Author Posted February 9, 2017 Trump wrong on Gorsuch's criticism of Trump's attacks on the judiciary. Then later lies in tirade about CNN reporter. If I made a thread about Trump truths, it might take less bandwidth. https://apple.news/ARmNTVe7rTdSHxbGy09YiNw
Tiberius Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 . She would be able to get me to do anything. bump
Nanker Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 I know better but I'm as much an !@#$ as anyone and sometimes more. Join the club. I know. We all do it from time to time. Things are a wee mite testy here these days.
keepthefaith Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 (edited) bump 2 bumps . She would be able to get me to do anything. Some complex math was done to design that outfit or a lengthy session with solidworks or spandex is the greatest invention of our lifetime. Edited February 9, 2017 by keepthefaith
Azalin Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 Things are a wee mite testy here these days. That's true, and it certainly isn't because of a massive influx of post-election spaz-attacks or anything.
Joe Miner Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 . She would be able to get me to do anything. Move your eyes up and examine the neckline of that picture. Pretty sure it's fake.
ExiledInIllinois Posted February 9, 2017 Posted February 9, 2017 That's true, and it certainly isn't because of a massive influx of post-election spaz-attacks or anything. Don't worry, @ least I will get bored shooting fish in a barrel after a while. As I have been the last 15 years, I will be here to say: "I told you so." No spaz attacks, just too much hypocrisy and golden material to pass up on. Fault me for lack of will power. ;-) Like the Asian carp and loony enviros that I disagree with. I am always there to remind them that they were wrong and are still wrong. What are we going on now? Almost 20 years since the inevitable "invasion?" Where are the fish Sen. Stabenow? Where are they: Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Ontario, & the Native Tribes? Yep, right behind the barrier... :-)
Recommended Posts