DC Tom Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 thanks for your reasonable reply, but wow are you kidding only jesus himself stood any chance against the first percieved black president to a predominantly white electorate that had finally internalized their brutal string of historical race issue mistakes. the only reason he didnt absolutely crush it was due to his obvious bright green experience level. thats certainly why i didnt vote for him the first time this second time, yeah she definitely blew it. the devestating mistake was the deplorables comment. i literally stood up and screamed at the tv the first time i heard her say that. why not just endorse trump you stupid ass B word, i think were my words. her second biggest mistake was having the moral infortitude to cheat with the dnc ... and then get caught. and then of course allowing the russians to steal that info in the first place so that they could help install their stooge the benghazi, the email, and the clinton foundation were at a bare minimum 90% trumped up fake charges executed by a republicanism that has shown thats literally the very best thing they are good at. the karl rove school of brilliant and brutally effective bullѕhit politics. but she could have overcome that if the other things didnt happen but they did and we got the stooge No, the email charges were very serious. Mis-represented as a national security "not protecting classified information" issue. But the real issue - mismanaging federal records and hiding them from Congress - was serious as hell, easily the equivalent of Watergate (which prompted most of the laws she broke with her email server.) And it was her meaiy-mouthed handling of it that sunk her. C'mon...records retention requirements required that president-elect Obama have his personal Blackberry taken away from him in 2009, but the Secretary of State thinks SHE can user her personal equipment for government business? That is ridiculously transparent. And if you think the Clinton Foundation conflict-of-interest was over-hyped, read some of the emails in the State Department's online reading room. "Mom, can I borrow the Navy?" No one who supported Clinton should be arguing for Trump's impeachment over emoluments. And I'm sure there was a lot of "Hey, let's go to the protest, it looks like fun!" If I had been in NYC with friends, I probably would have gone too. Fun people watching outdoors on a nice sunny day, then out for dinner. Sounds like a good time. And a not insignificant number of men saying "Hey, let's go to the protest, we might get laid!"
boyst Posted January 24, 2017 Author Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) thanks for your reasonable reply, but wow are you kidding only jesus himself stood any chance against the first percieved black president to a predominantly white electorate that had finally internalized their brutal string of historical race issue mistakes. the only reason he didnt absolutely crush it was due to his obvious bright green experience level. thats certainly why i didnt vote for him the first time this second time, yeah she definitely blew it. the devestating mistake was the deplorables comment. i literally stood up and screamed at the tv the first time i heard her say that. why not just endorse trump you stupid ass B word, i think were my words. her second biggest mistake was having the moral infortitude to cheat with the dnc ... and then get caught. and then of course allowing the russians to steal that info in the first place so that they could help install their stooge the benghazi, the email, and the clinton foundation were at a bare minimum 90% trumped up fake charges executed by a republicanism that has shown thats literally the very best thing they are good at. the karl rove school of brilliant and brutally effective bullѕhit politics. but she could have overcome that if the other things didnt happen but they did and we got the stooge I am Jesus Christ returned. This is not a lie. I promise and my dad (also me) would strike me (myself) down. As the coolest Jew carpenter ever I tell you that you are wrong. About everything. PS. #jet fuel can't melt steel Beams Jesus ...out Edited January 24, 2017 by Boyst62
Meathead Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 Are you now going to tell us that Benghazi WAS caused by a YouTube video? no that was a terrible event that could have happened to any ss. virtually every embassy requests more security funds, especially those in hazardous countries. i recall seeing an estimate that if every such request was fulfulled it would cost, well, ridiculously enormous amounts of money. it was a random event precipitated by violent head-f***ked people that infect one of our religions. thats pretty much it Are you now going to tell us she was okay as SoS with having ONLY a private server? no it was reckless but its disingenuous to pretend she was the only one. this gubmint email thing has been rediculous for a long time and should have been put a halt to long ago. do we recall how karl rove broke campaign laws by having all correspondence go through the RNC servers? and then when the contents were subpoenaed their IT guy (which i used to be) was suddenly 'oh backup? what are backups? oh those things. yeah we lost all those. yeah amazing thing these computers, eh?" so yes, it was foolish for her to give republicans that opening. its probably the best example of her hubris tripping her up, thinking she didnt have to worry about little weasels who can turn even totally non-important things into the biggest scandal you ever heard of. its actually evil brilliance. but its still evil, Are you now going to tell us the Clinton Foundation was not a money-laundering operation for foreign countries that support terrorists? Is this NYT story fake news? i recall that article when it came out. there certainly are some borderline activities deserving of criticism in the clinton foundation. but their experience as lawyers kept them from crossing that borderline. that kind of foundation is always going to benefit from time to time with a political leader at the helm, especially two as well known, and in bubbas case popular, as the clintons. im not comfortable with it, but it is what it is. and it wasnt illegal. and certainly not even close to disqualifying her as a candidate Are you now going to tell us that Benghazi WAS caused by a YouTube video? Are you now going to tell us she was okay as SoS with having ONLY a private server? Are you now going to tell us the Clinton Foundation was not a money-laundering operation for foreign countries that support terrorists? Is this NYT story fake news? wth. my editor isnt working right. i knew i deleted that last set of questions but it showed up anyway. where the hell is that button i axed you guys about?
boyst Posted January 24, 2017 Author Posted January 24, 2017 no that was a terrible event that could have happened to any ss. virtually every embassy requests more security funds, especially those in hazardous countries. i recall seeing an estimate that if every such request was fulfulled it would cost, well, ridiculously enormous amounts of money. it was a random event precipitated by violent head-f***ked people that infect one of our religions. thats pretty much it no it was reckless but its disingenuous to pretend she was the only one. this gubmint email thing has been rediculous for a long time and should have been put a halt to long ago. do we recall how karl rove broke campaign laws by having all correspondence go through the RNC servers? and then when the contents were subpoenaed their IT guy (which i used to be) was suddenly 'oh backup? what are backups? oh those things. yeah we lost all those. yeah amazing thing these computers, eh?" so yes, it was foolish for her to give republicans that opening. its probably the best example of her hubris tripping her up, thinking she didnt have to worry about little weasels who can turn even totally non-important things into the biggest scandal you ever heard of. its actually evil brilliance. but its still evil, i recall that article when it came out. there certainly are some borderline activities deserving of criticism in the clinton foundation. but their experience as lawyers kept them from crossing that borderline. that kind of foundation is always going to benefit from time to time with a political leader at the helm, especially two as well known, and in bubbas case popular, as the clintons. im not comfortable with it, but it is what it is. and it wasnt illegal. and certainly not even close to disqualifying her as a candidate you lose cred to say everyone else does it so JTS bit a big deal
KD in CA Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 i recall that article when it came out. there certainly are some borderline activities deserving of criticism in the clinton foundation. but their experience as lawyers kept them from crossing that borderline. Yup, once you have two politician lawyers in charge and billions of dollars flowing, you can put it in the vault that everything is on the up and up!
Meathead Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 I am Jesus Christ returned. This is not a lie. I promise and my dad (also me) would strike me (myself) down. As the coolest Jew carpenter ever I tell you that you are wrong. About everything. PS. #jet fuel can't melt steel Beams Jesus ...out lmao! that was awesome Yup, once you have two politician lawyers in charge and billions of dollars flowing, you can put it in the vault that everything is on the up and up! yeah. like what did you expect? they are f***king politicans. did you forget the politicians book of rules? if it aint illegal you can usually get away with it. put two lawyers on the books and youre sorta asking yourself to get f***ed on the borderlines why do you think black politicians get caught so much? they dont have much practice! take it from me black folks, study the white politicians tiptoeing techniques. saves you from the joint
PastaJoe Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 The photo pastajoe posted was taken earlier in the morning, maybe an hour before Trump was sworn in (and earlier than the photo caption says). The accompanying Obama inauguration photo was taken much later, during Obama's speech. The two are hardly comparable. Dishonest reporting, like you said. Jim Bourg January 22 at 4:29pm · I am seeing a lot of inaccurate talk and allegations online about the crowd photos from Friday's Trump inauguration that are simply not borne out by the FACTS. Now I see my own friends reposting this disinformation on Facebook. Only one news organization had a still photographer atop the Washington monument for the inauguration and I assigned him to be there. This photo by Reuters News Pictures staff photographer Lucas Jackson was taken at 12:01:18 p.m. on Friday and not much earlier as many people are trying to claim. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154857353398418&set=a.6444473417.8344.587178417&type=3&theater
Meathead Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 lol i remember that video. i also remember saying to myself yeah an old white guy getting chatted up by a cute chick secretly filming him thinking what stories can he tell that will get him to dick her. god i hate to admit it but i would face that temptation myself but yeah id like to see some evidence
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 Jim Bourg January 22 at 4:29pm · I am seeing a lot of inaccurate talk and allegations online about the crowd photos from Friday's Trump inauguration that are simply not borne out by the FACTS. Now I see my own friends reposting this disinformation on Facebook. Only one news organization had a still photographer atop the Washington monument for the inauguration and I assigned him to be there. This photo by Reuters News Pictures staff photographer Lucas Jackson was taken at 12:01:18 p.m. on Friday and not much earlier as many people are trying to claim. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154857353398418&set=a.6444473417.8344.587178417&type=3&theater 1) I found that same crowd shot on a capture of the live feed from BBC, time-stamped at 11:10am (4:10 GMT). 2) bull **** that was taken by a Reuters photographer. That's from the National Mall Earthcam on the Washington Monument. That is easily verifiable. Now please explain to me why the people who believe that Hillary lost because of fake news posted on Facebook insist on believing everything posted to Facebook?????
Meathead Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 2) bull **** that was taken by a Reuters photographer. That's from the National Mall Earthcam on the Washington Monument. That is easily verifiable. wow for real? well they already got caught trying to elbow out the voters, i guess this wouldnt even be that shocking. but you would think they would know better how about you easily verify it for me?
boyst Posted January 25, 2017 Author Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) lmao! that was awesome yeah. like what did you expect? they are f***king politicans. did you forget the politicians book of rules? if it aint illegal you can usually get away with it. put two lawyers on the books and youre sorta asking yourself to get f***ed on the borderlines why do you think black politicians get caught so much? they dont have much practice! take it from me black folks, study the white politicians tiptoeing techniques. saves you from the joint as you can tell i am hardly a right wing conservative... and i wanted anyone but Trump as long as it was not Hillary. but since trump has been speaking in the few weeks before the election and the actions since, whlie some times childish, he has done a good thing and hopefully can reduce the role of federal government also, meathead, see below. you're not ****head. pasta joe is ****head because he had already seen proof. Jim Bourg January 22 at 4:29pm · I am seeing a lot of inaccurate talk and allegations online about the crowd photos from Friday's Trump inauguration that are simply not borne out by the FACTS. Now I see my own friends reposting this disinformation on Facebook. Only one news organization had a still photographer atop the Washington monument for the inauguration and I assigned him to be there. This photo by Reuters News Pictures staff photographer Lucas Jackson was taken at 12:01:18 p.m. on Friday and not much earlier as many people are trying to claim. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10154857353398418&set=a.6444473417.8344.587178417&type=3&theater hi ****head. eat **** http://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/ Edited January 25, 2017 by Boyst62
Meathead Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 im not really fully getting boyst yet. im both scared and intrigued. boy dont seem right but something remains interesting. filter was closing but its been put on pause. proceed at least im not a ****head. not sure which **** that means but ... yay not a ****head. take that mom
Greg F Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 lol i remember that video. i also remember saying to myself yeah an old white guy getting chatted up by a cute chick secretly filming him thinking what stories can he tell that will get him to dick her. god i hate to admit it but i would face that temptation myself but yeah id like to see some evidence Says the boy who thinks he is immune to cognitive bias. Got to give Meathead credit ... he likes to tell whoppers.
boyst Posted January 25, 2017 Author Posted January 25, 2017 im not really fully getting boyst yet. im both scared and intrigued. boy dont seem right but something remains interesting. filter was closing but its been put on pause. proceed at least im not a ****head. not sure which **** that means but ... yay not a ****head. take that mom i'm sort of mysterious in a Brittany kind of way. **** head is like being full of Tiberius. or walking in the dog park and stepping in some tiberius ****.
boyst Posted January 25, 2017 Author Posted January 25, 2017 (edited) whats a tiberius again? i forgot it's tiberius. at one point bull **** would change to stevestojan automatically, like kitty vs. p*ssy though, i am not sure if its still out there but c*ck used to filter to beerball. but now it appears to be gugny. Edited January 25, 2017 by Boyst62
Meathead Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 i hate that changing words thing. its gay. not homo gay, i love the fags, just not in THAT way. the lame kind of gay. sorry wanda sykes, words evolve different meanings and they arent always insulting to fags
Nanker Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 whats a tiberius again? i forgot This is Tiberius. As Pliny the Elder said, he is the gloomiest of men. He was grand uncle to Caligula - perhaps the worst reprobate to be Emperor, he himself took pleasure in having an island filled with dwarfs, exotic animals, and young children that he routinely molested at his leisure for his pleasure. You know - much like today's Hollywood elite who travel on private jets to a private island in the Caribbean with underage hookers onboard and at the compound, or over to Thailand where they pay to have sex with children. But they're Dems, so it's okay...
Meathead Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 well the dwarves and exotic animals i can understand. but the young children thats just wrong
Recommended Posts