row_33 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: He sold out everything that matters with regards to this country, and undermined its ability to defend itself while suppressing his citizens' voices in the election process. He was a bad president and is a bad man. History will not be kind to him. He still is better than the 4 I listed below him not a hope anyone credibly dares attack him the next 2000 years
Deranged Rhino Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, row_33 said: He still is better than the 4 I listed below him not a hope anyone credibly dares attack him the next 2000 years This is going to get very ugly for 44. Very. We've only just started. By the time they're done with him he'll be lucky if he gets to stay in the country. 2
row_33 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 (edited) Obama is more Teflon than Reagan and his enemies have more important things to do, like enjoy life Edited April 26, 2019 by row_33
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: Obama is more Teflon than Reagan and his enemies have more important things to do, like enjoy life I think Obama has been Teflon due to the MSM covering (or shall we say not covering) his ineptness and criminality (or at the very least, the criminality of the upper tier of his administration). Will that continue to hold? No idea. But as they say, the next few months should be interesting. 1
row_33 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I think Obama has been Teflon due to the MSM covering (or shall we say not covering) his ineptness and criminality (or at the very least, the criminality of the upper tier of his administration). Will that continue to hold? No idea. But as they say, the next few months should be interesting. I know.... but you can’t attack him just because....
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 2 hours ago, row_33 said: He was a good man for his time my decision is final and not appealable and I fully respect your refutationzzz I'll agree to disagree. He was a good speaker/reader though, I'll give him that.
row_33 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 23 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: I'll agree to disagree. He was a good speaker/reader though, I'll give him that. he is a decent man, he did a decent job running the country he wasn't Nixon or Reagan petty attacks on him will get you labelled a racist in two seconds flat, be very very carefulllllllllllllllll
BuffaloHokie13 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 Just now, row_33 said: he is a decent man, he did a decent job running the country he wasn't Nixon or Reagan petty attacks on him will get you labelled a racist in two seconds flat, be very very carefulllllllllllllllll Nothing petty about condemning his constant drone strikes, his categorization of 'enemy combatants', and his foreign policy in general. Also worth pointing out his divisive nature on many cultural issues, of which he was on the wrong side of many. 1 1
row_33 Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 13 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Nothing petty about condemning his constant drone strikes, his categorization of 'enemy combatants', and his foreign policy in general. Also worth pointing out his divisive nature on many cultural issues, of which he was on the wrong side of many. extremely petty stuff, 99% of the population will label you a nutcase and a racist for talking like this....
DC Tom Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 49 minutes ago, row_33 said: he did a decent job running the country No he didn't. He ran it like he was royalty.
Chef Jim Posted April 26, 2019 Posted April 26, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, DC Tom said: No he didn't. He ran it like he was royalty. Because in the minds of his fawning admirers and the MSM he was. And in his own mind? Edited April 26, 2019 by Chef Jim
Tiberius Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 The people are not happy. Quote President Trump’s strongest case for reelection remains the country’s healthy economy, but the potency of that issue for him is complicated by a widespread belief that the economy mainly benefits people already in power, a Washington Post-ABC News pollfinds. The result previews a fresh wave of populism that could reshape yet another presidential campaign with about 18 months to go before voters decide whether to return Trump to the White House. This sentiment runs the deepest among Democratic and independent registered voters, but also exists among a significant slice of Republicans. About 8 in 10 Democrats and more than 6 in 10 independents say the country’s economic system gives an advantage to those already in power, while nearly a third of Republicans share that view.
Tommy Callahan Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 (edited) 2 hours ago, Tiberius said: The people are not happy. Lol So you saw his record high poll numbers? http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_apr29 Edited April 29, 2019 by Chris farley
Tiberius Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 7 minutes ago, Chris farley said: Lol So you saw his record high poll numbers? http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_apr29 Lol, Rasmussen leans Trump to say the least
TPS Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 On 4/26/2019 at 9:34 AM, Buffalo_Gal said: US economy grows by 3.2% in the first quarter, topping expectations </snip> Exports rose 3.7% in the first quarter, while imports decreased by 3.7%. Economic growth also got a lift from strong investments in intellectual property products. Those investments expanded by 8.6%. </snip> This was a pleasant surprise. It looks like his trade stance is paying off, as changes in the trade balance contributed a full 1% out of the 3.2% rise. This will most likely be the most important factor for the remainder of the year. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 (edited) 8 minutes ago, TPS said: This was a pleasant surprise. It looks like his trade stance is paying off, as changes in the trade balance contributed a full 1% out of the 3.2% rise. This will most likely be the most important factor for the remainder of the year. Probably why the Dems don't want to pass the USMCA deal. Better trade for the US, more jobs, better economy is great for American workers (estimates are 2 million jobs). However, the politics of it is better economy benefits reelecting President Trump. My my hope is they would put Americans first, but then I laugh myself silly thinking it is even a possibility. I am sure Trump will be out in the "rust belt states" hammering this home. Edited April 29, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1
BeginnersMind Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 2 hours ago, Chris farley said: Lol So you saw his record high poll numbers? http://m.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_apr29 Cherry picking Rasmussen has been discussed before. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html With his epic economy, he’s still below 45 on average. None of if it will matter if he loses PA.
Chef Jim Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 5 hours ago, Tiberius said: The people are not happy. About 8 in 10 Democrats and more than 6 in 10 independents say the country’s economic system gives an advantage to those already in power, while nearly a third of Republicans share that view. So the economic system that people are unhappy about it Trumps doing? People are dumb and so are you. 1
IDBillzFan Posted April 29, 2019 Posted April 29, 2019 58 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said: None of if it will matter if he loses PA. In fairness, not of it will matter if any of the current DNC candidates gets the nod to run against Trump. I hate to sound like a Footloose soundtrack, but where's the streetwise Hercules to fight the rising odds? You need a hero.
Recommended Posts