3rdnlng Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 The_Dude making up for his new pledge to temper his racist rhetoric by endearing himself to other posters.
row_33 Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 10 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: The_Dude making up for his new pledge to temper his racist rhetoric by endearing himself to other posters. the laughter never stops thank goodness
The_Dude Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: The_Dude making up for his new pledge to temper his racist rhetoric by endearing himself to other posters.
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: The_Dude making up for his new pledge to temper his racist rhetoric by endearing himself to other posters. What'd he say now? Do I have to go look?
3rdnlng Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: What'd he say now? Do I have to go look? It's just a few posts back on the prior page, responding to you.
DC Tom Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said: It's just a few posts back on the prior page, responding to you. So I don't have to go look. Let me guess...yet another desperate failed attempt to prove he's not a shitgoblin? 1
The_Dude Posted January 25, 2019 Posted January 25, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: So I don't have to go look. Let me guess...yet another desperate failed attempt to prove he's not a shitgoblin? Yeah, you read it.
3rdnlng Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 4 hours ago, DC Tom said: So I don't have to go look. Let me guess...yet another desperate failed attempt to prove he's not a shitgoblin? He's challenging you to a version of Jeopardy with every subject "History". He doesn't think you are up to the challenge.
The_Dude Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: He's challenging you to a version of Jeopardy with every subject "History". He doesn't think you are up to the challenge. Well, Alex, considering he’s been wrong according to my friends who go by the name “professor” on multiple occasions I’d say that’s correct. Theres a differnce in reading ***** and experiencing *****. Edited January 26, 2019 by The_Dude
3rdnlng Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 16 minutes ago, The_Dude said: Well, Alex, considering he’s been wrong according to my friends who go by the name “professor” on multiple occasions I’d say that’s correct. Theres a differnce in reading ***** and experiencing *****. And the professors know this? How? You might as well just pass it by this guy:
3rdnlng Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 19 minutes ago, The_Dude said: Im not sure whom that is. I knew you wouldn't get it. Take it as a lesson, some of us know more than you. 1
Chef Jim Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 52 minutes ago, The_Dude said: Im not sure whom that is. Whom? So you’re not just a racist ***** you’re a dumb racist *****. Hmmm a triple redundancy.
DC Tom Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 2 hours ago, The_Dude said: Theres a differnce in reading ***** and experiencing *****. Yes, I'm not qualified to speak to census data from the 1850's, because I didn't experience the 1850's. You are inexpressibly stupid. 1
KD in CA Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 13 hours ago, plenzmd1 said: so..this would be an extremely radical point to made in terms of the history of the US no? Have you ever submitted anything or wrote anything to document your findings? I mean, of course, I would find out stuff like this on a Buffalo Bills message board.. Interesting article here https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/aug/24/viral-image/viral-post-gets-it-wrong-extent-slavery-1860/ Interesting if you find bullsh--- fabrication and manipulation of statistics to be interesting. The assertion was 1.4% of Americans owned slaves. Not 1.4% of Americans plus all their offspring owned slaves or 1.4% of Americans living in a certain region owned slaves, it was just 1.4% of Americans owned slaves. Yet this bullsh-- article essentially says 'let's just ignore that, reduce the denominator by more than half and then declare that 5% is more than 1.4%'. Brilliant! Out of the 31m people in 1860, roughly 22m lived in the north and 9m in the south. By the author's stats, 4.9% of the southerners owned slaves, or roughly 440,000 people. 440k / 31m = 1.4% of Americans owned slaves. So the meme was in fact, true. 1
The_Dude Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 8 hours ago, DC Tom said: Yes, I'm not qualified to speak to census data from the 1850's, because I didn't experience the 1850's. You are inexpressibly stupid. Again, there’s no way what you think you read is correct. And clearly youre not being alive in the 1850’s wasn’t my point. Idiot. 9 hours ago, 3rdnlng said: I knew you wouldn't get it. Take it as a lesson, some of us know more than you. Settle down, Giligan.
B-Man Posted January 28, 2019 Posted January 28, 2019 WELL, GOOD: Saudi’s Falih sees no impact on oil markets from Venezuela turmoil. This shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. American frackers have been more than taking up the slack created by Venezuela’s plummeting production, and Venezuela’s OPEC partners are increasingly hungry for market share. .
Buffalo_Gal Posted January 29, 2019 Posted January 29, 2019 This could go in so many threads, but I'll slap it in here... DOJ handed down some indictments against Huawei today: This one for stealing t-mobile secrets:Chinese Telecommunications Device Manufacturer and its U.S. Affiliate Indicted for Theft of Trade Secrets, Wire Fraud, and Obstruction Of Justice This one for money laundering, illegal trade with Iran - starting in 2007 and continuing all during the Obama years:Chinese Telecommunications Conglomerate Huawei and Huawei CFO Wanzhou Meng Charged With Financial Fraud Should be interesting to see how this shakes out with a US- China trade deal. 2
/dev/null Posted January 30, 2019 Posted January 30, 2019 On 1/25/2019 at 9:21 PM, 3rdnlng said: And the professors know this? How? You might as well just pass it by this guy: dude could build a settlement out of coconut trees and keep a radio running for years with no batteries but he couldn't figure out how to patch a hole in a boat or astro-navigate a way home
BringBackOrton Posted January 30, 2019 Posted January 30, 2019 1 hour ago, /dev/null said: dude could build a settlement out of coconut trees and keep a radio running for years with no batteries but he couldn't figure out how to patch a hole in a boat or astro-navigate a way home Gilligan’s island was a false flag occupation @Deranged Rhino 2
Recommended Posts