Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 10/24/2018 at 9:17 PM, 3rdnlng said:

I wonder if a booming economy with infrastructure work will help CAT? The USA will win any trade war with whomever and we'll be in a much better place than before any retaliatory tariffs bring our trading partners to their knees the table.

Expand  

What infrastructure work? Certainly not any increasing from federal funding increases..there is no stinking money as revenue keeps decreasing on the federal level...

Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 3:04 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Expand  

 

Makes sense. Lower the drug price, sell more product.

 

It's about time that the government did something about drug companies forcing US consumers to subsidize R&D through outrageous pricing schemes, while they sold the same drugs in other countries for pure profit at a fraction of the US price.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 3:04 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Expand  

Not saying Trump has no bearing on this..but I think the below prolly has a ton more

 

  Quote

 abandonment rates ranging from7.5% for those with $0 copay to more than 75% for copays greater than $350.”

Expand  

Looks to me like the drug makers are shifting pricing policy to sell more drugs in this market climate and shifting insurance plans,  then claim it is due to Trump, as we all know Trump likes to be slurped, and then hope for more tax breaks and bigger protections on trade agreements...

 

BTW, I agree with what Trump did in the USMCA on longer protections..we want companies to make a chit ton of money when they hit a breakthrough..so they keep funding and researching breakthroughs!

Posted (edited)
  On 10/25/2018 at 3:36 PM, plenzmd1 said:

https://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-budget-deficit-widens-to-fifth-highest-ever-cbo-reports-2018-09-11

 

 

so..where is the discrepancy of these two ?

 

I ask in all seriusness

Expand  

 

You had stated "there is no stinking money as  revenue keeps decreasing at the federal level."

 

However the article he quotes says, "For the fiscal year as a whole — which started last October — all federal revenues are up by $31 billion."

Edited by Bray Wyatt
Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 3:54 PM, Bray Wyatt said:

 

You had stated "there is no stinking money as  revenue keeps decreasing at the federal level."

 

However the article he quotes says, "For the fiscal year as a whole — which started last October — all federal revenues are up by $31 billion."

Expand  

Lets see what the first month of the fiscal brings...yearly totals include periods before tax cust went into effect.

 

Either way..with all us agreeing spending is way outpacing revenues..where does the idea that infrastructure spending is going to move up in a significant way come from?

Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 4:10 PM, plenzmd1 said:

Lets see what the first month of the fiscal brings...yearly totals include periods before tax cust went into effect.

Expand  

 

Point being that you're comparing two completely different numbers that aren't comparable.  Don't compare August 2018 to FY2018.  Compare Aug 2017 to Aug 2018 and see what the differences are.  (Note: I don't know what the differences are.  It's just a much more valid comparison.)

Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 7:40 PM, DC Tom said:

 

Point being that you're comparing two completely different numbers that aren't comparable.  Don't compare August 2018 to FY2018.  Compare Aug 2017 to Aug 2018 and see what the differences are.  (Note: I don't know what the differences are.  It's just a much more valid comparison.)

Expand  

I agree ..and this statement from the CBO was for August 2018 vs August 2017

 

Receipts fell by 3%, with corporate taxes dropping by $5 billion, while revenue from income and payroll taxes rose marginally.

Posted (edited)
  On 10/25/2018 at 4:10 PM, plenzmd1 said:

Lets see what the first month of the fiscal brings...yearly totals include periods before tax cust went into effect.

 

Either way..with all us agreeing spending is way outpacing revenues..where does the idea that infrastructure spending is going to move up in a significant way come from?

Expand  

The article is fudging the numbers to support a point. The first half of the fiscal year ends in March; for the first four months of the current fiscal year Oct -  Jan, revenues in 2018 > 2017 (for each month individually) because they are based on the previous tax rates; tax revenues are lower in every month after Jan except April, which is also based on 2017 tax rates. 

Here is the Treasury Report: TAble 1 has the data.

Edited by TPS
adding info
Posted
  On 10/25/2018 at 7:48 PM, TPS said:

The article is fudging the numbers to support a point. The first half of the fiscal year ends in March; for the first four months of the current fiscal year Oct -  Jan, revenues in 2018 > 2017 (for each month individually) because they are based on the previous tax rates; tax revenues are lower in every month after Jan except April, which is also based on 2017 tax rates. 

Here is the Treasury Report: TAble 1 has the data.

Expand  

I am not quite following

Posted (edited)
  On 10/25/2018 at 8:11 PM, plenzmd1 said:

I am not quite following

Expand  

It supports your point, revenues are Lower. 

 

The reason Revenues were up the first half of the fiscal year (which starts in October) was because we were still under 2017 tax rates for the first 4 of 6 months. If you look at the data, once the tax cut went into effect in February, revenues went down relative to revenues in the same month in the previous tax year. For example, January 2018 revenues are higher than January 2017, but February 2018 revenues--and every month after that--has lower revenues than 2017 (except April, which is also based on 2017 rates).

 

The article posted (by LA)  was a biased editorial, not an analysis.

 

Edited by TPS
  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...