Doc Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 And as has been said before, millions more voted for The Donald than showed up at the marches. Ouch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Seen on Facebook today: The Men's March Against Fascism didn't have nearly as many signs. The Left is not amused Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 some chicks will spread them for anyone with a nice smile. awe! My orthodontist says thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary M Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 And yet here we sit, with the undeniable truth, that even with the "insane person the GOP vomited up onto the nation," the DNC was simply unable to find anyone -- anyone at all -- the country would prefer more. Man. That's gotta sting. But, Comy.... But The Russians..... But But but. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 One thing I learned from the internet: even this guy can get a girl to bed. Its really weird. I can be as big of a douchebag and !@#$ as can be. Have warning signs and bull **** all over... and women still fall for me. I have potential I guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Its really weird. I can be as big of a douchebag and !@#$ as can be. Have warning signs and bull **** all over... and women still fall for me. I have potential I guess... What warning signs? And actual bull ****? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 What warning signs? And actual bull ****? The zip-ties, duct tape, and collection of slightly used rape whistles strewn about his back seat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 I mean...technically the country did prefer HRC more, 48% to 46%, a difference of 2.8M people or so. To your actual point: The Democrats need to put DWS in a box, they need to lock that box, cut a hole in it so she can breathe and be fed, then bury the box in the basement beneath their non denominational holiday decorations so she's never heard from or seen again. But that's just my two cents. See you again in 14 months or so. Technically, California preferred her more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 The zip-ties, duct tape, and collection of slightly used rape whistles strewn about his back seat. I meant besides the ones we already knew about. Technically, California preferred her more. She can be POC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Technically, California preferred her more. Why that very basic, simple, undeniable truth is lost on so many people is mind-boggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Maybe she could run for POC if she doesn't want to be embarrassed by losing the NYC Mayoral race to Bo Dietl. They would love her and she could file for secession from the USA and be its first dick-taker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Why that very basic, simple, undeniable truth is lost on so many people is mind-boggling. What's even more mind-boggling is that it's the basis for the argument "The electoral college should be done away with!" Because California shouldn't be dictated to by flyover country, but the opposite is perfectly fine, apparently... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Technically, California preferred her more. Why that very basic, simple, undeniable truth is lost on so many people is mind-boggling. What's even more mind-boggling is that it's the basis for the argument "The electoral college should be done away with!" Because California shouldn't be dictated to by flyover country, but the opposite is perfectly fine, apparently... And yet if Texas goes blue (margin was slimmer than California's), HRC wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 (edited) And yet if Texas goes blue (margin was slimmer than California's), HRC wins. And yet ?? We do not need hypotheticals It doesn't change the fact that if you take away California's > 3 million HRC lead in votes then you could state that the rest of the county "preferred" Trump. Silly ?.............you bet.............but thats what the "she won the popular vote" people want Edited January 24, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 And yet ?? We do not need hypotheticals It doesn't change the fact that if you take away California's > 3 million HRC lead in votes then you could state that the rest of the county "preferred" Trump. Silly ?.............you bet.............but thats what the "she won the popular vote" people want And if we are going to indulge in hypothetical, people should at least be honest enough to admit the vote would have been significantly different if the rules had been significantly different. If there was no EC, millions of voters would have cast a ballot for one of the two primary candidates rather than a 3d party or write in candidate. Millions more would have come out to vote rather than saying '!@#$ it' because they live in a non competitive state. Hillary doesn't win CA by 4 million votes if it's a national popular vote election. As a result, no one has any idea who would have won in a national popular vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 And yet if Texas goes blue (margin was slimmer than California's), HRC wins. What is your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Cat Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 What is your point? Whichever one you were making by specifying California over country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Whichever one you were making by specifying California over country. Are you at all familiar with the purpose of the Electoral College? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 And as has been said before, millions more voted for The Donald than showed up at the marches. Ouch. And millions more voted for Clinton than The Donald, which obviously bothers him given his latest looney claim of millions of fraudulent votes. Ouch. If he believes it he should call for an investigation. Maybe the fraudulent votes were for him. Are you at all familiar with the purpose of the Electoral College? To give southern states 3/5th of a vote for each slave they owned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted January 24, 2017 Share Posted January 24, 2017 Whichever one you were making by specifying California over country. Your point was that you're not okay with flyover country dictating to the rest of the country, but perfectly okay with California dictating to the rest of the country? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts