Mr. WEO Posted January 13, 2017 Posted January 13, 2017 He had no business near the game where as Incognito's absence from the original lineup was a snub. Why do you ask? So the selection process is flawed or isn't it?
Saxum Posted January 13, 2017 Posted January 13, 2017 I think he meant to say you're a hypocrite or inconsistent. He could have meant to say you're a hypocrite and inconsistent; one does not necessarily mean other is not true.
TakeYouToTasker Posted January 13, 2017 Posted January 13, 2017 (edited) So the selection process is flawed or isn't it? I'm not sure that's relevant. My original point was that Richie Incognito, in my judgment, deserved to be a starter on the original team, and that this corrected a snub. My secondary point was that Tyrod Taylor did not deserve to be on the team last year, even as an alternate. The two are completely unrelated. My third point is that the poster who asked the question leading to the second point is attempting to imply something ugly that he's not man enough to throw his full voice at. If you want to make the case that the selection process is flawed, have at it. He could have meant to say you're a hypocrite and inconsistent; one does not necessarily mean other is not true. How does saying one player deserved to play in the Pro Bowl and the other did not amount to hypocrisy and inconsistency? Edited January 13, 2017 by TakeYouToTasker
Recommended Posts