LabattBlue Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Look at that...another "I hate the BN/Jerry Sullivan" thread. I'm sure there will be at least a dozen or more threads on the same subject in the coming weeks.
Original Byrd Man Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Man, talk about Sullivan always having his finger on trigger ready to fire...didnt take him long to write another piece of garbage. It's always best to do you what well. I actually heard McDermott didn't want control just wanted to be aware of what was going on. Way to be on it Jerry. Look at that...another "I hate the BN/Jerry Sullivan" thread. I'm sure there will be at least a dozen or more threads on the same subject in the coming weeks. He could always do everyone a favor and find a job he is more qualified for.
BrooklynBills Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 It's always best to do you what well. I actually heard McDermott didn't want control just wanted to be aware of what was going on. Way to be on it Jerry. We'll find out soon enough. He would be crazy not to ask for it.
baskingridgebillsfan Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Word is... Pegs have pictures of Jerry Sullivan watching hookers golden shower each other on a Super Bowl site hotel room bed where Vic Carruci once slept. I can confirm that I heard that rumor as well
Rico Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 As per Jerrah http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/11/jerry-sullivan-mcdermott-hire-diminish-whaley/ Thanks!
PromoTheRobot Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 (edited) Look at that...another "I hate the BN/Jerry Sullivan" thread. I'm sure there will be at least a dozen or more threads on the same subject in the coming weeks. What can we say. He draws it like flies to dung. Edited January 11, 2017 by PromoTheRobot
YoloinOhio Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Not even the Cleveland media treats the Browns this way btw
baskingridgebillsfan Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Not even the Cleveland media treats the Browns this way btw Brooklyn Nets get better coverage from the big new papers. It is sad to see the News allow this
DC Tom Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Hey Sully...SHUT UP! Is it possible to let us be hopeful for a few weeks? Why would you even bother?
Helpmenow Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Not even the Cleveland media treats the Browns this way btw Have they made the playoffs
YoloinOhio Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Have they made the playoffsum .... noooooo
Reed83HOF Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 So are we just pissed because it is a Jerry article? I ask because I don't see a discussion of the article; just it's garbage and he sucks
Peter Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 I think he had the article written a week or so ago and was just waiting to insert the name of the new head coach. He and Bucky are now spit balling how they can somehow include the words "Pegulas" and "over their heads" in future articles . . . no matter what the subject. Man, talk about Sullivan always having his finger on trigger ready to fire...didnt take him long to write another piece of garbage.
Malazan Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 I think he had the article written a week or so ago and was just waiting to insert the name of the new head coach. He and Bucky are now spit balling how they can somehow include the words "Pegulas" and "over their heads" in future articles . . . no matter what the subject. Today, hundreds of children in Africa died...but in Buffalo, the Pegulas are in over their head...
Peter Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Today, hundreds of children in Africa died...but in Buffalo, the Pegulas are in over their head... That is exactly they way they do it. Well done.
BarkLessWagMore Posted January 11, 2017 Posted January 11, 2017 Meanwhile, Mark Gaughan who is a very competent reporter IMO, wrote an article today which is 180 degrees opposite of Jerry's "theory" http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/11/mark-gaughans-hot-read-drought-damned-let-doug-sean-show-breathe/ Basically he throws an educated guess that McDermott was Whaley's guy all along since they both got their first NFL opportunity from none other than Tom Modrak. Jerry just like to pee on everyone's corn flakes. Because he can.
Uffalo Ills Posted January 12, 2017 Posted January 12, 2017 Well, that did not take long. I am so sick of the nitwits at the Buffalo News.
bobobonators Posted January 12, 2017 Author Posted January 12, 2017 (edited) So are we just pissed because it is a Jerry article? I ask because I don't see a discussion of the article; just it's garbage and he sucks What is there to say really? Jerry says Whaley is undermined by the McDermott hire without a shred of factual evidence just negative innuendo. In other words, he's being purposely negative for no reason at all. So yeh, the article is garbage really. Kind of regret even posting it. Edited January 12, 2017 by bobobonators
r00tabaga Posted January 12, 2017 Posted January 12, 2017 I live in Rochester so we don't get to read or listen to Sullivan. Oh yeah, that's a good thing.
Peter Posted January 12, 2017 Posted January 12, 2017 What is the official narrative: Was McDermott a Whaley hire or not . . or will we only hear that he was not when Jason LaCanfora tweets that McDermott may be fired minutes before an important game.
Recommended Posts