Mikie2times Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 If we don't keep Tyrod we need a veteran presence to compete with Cardale or a potential draft pick. Hoyer is injury prone but has shown some positive things when healthy. QB rating in the 90's in 17 starts the last two years with 25 TD's to 7 INT's. 4 starts this year, before breaking his arm early in his 5th start vs GB. 4 full games games, all over 300 yards passing, 3 games with 2 TD's, no picks. He got his shot with Cleveland, Houston, and Chicago. Not exactly juggernaut offenses. Stat line is trending up fast. I would love to bring Hoyer into the competition.
Dr.Sack Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Tyrod should be the starter until someone beats him. Cardale is a joke & Hoyer gets injured more than Romo.
Mikie2times Posted January 8, 2017 Author Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 6:13 AM, Dr.Sack said: Tyrod should be the starter until someone beats him. Cardale is a joke & Hoyer gets injured more than Romo. The first sentence says if the Bills do not retain Tyrod. So if they don't who is the starter? Are we going to start a guy as green as Cardale or a rookie? I don't see it. We need a vet for a temporary period. If it's not a trade or Tyrod who is your guy?
H2o Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 I would be good with Hoyer. If he stays healthy I think he gets us to the postseason before Tyrod could. He would be a decent bridge.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 not good enough for playoffs nor Tank, but would make a solid back up.
Boatdrinks Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 6:22 AM, KzooMike said: The first sentence says if the Bills do not retain Tyrod. So if they don't who is the starter? Are we going to start a guy as green as Cardale or a rookie? I don't see it. We need a vet for a temporary period. If it's not a trade or Tyrod who is your guy? Either trade for a vet like Romo or draft a rookie and play him. This of course is assuming the Bills move on from Tyrod. I would draft Watson at 10 and get him ready.
NastyNateSoldiers Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 Let's give Cordele a shot if he busts that's great for us. We need to blow it up. We need 2 horrible seasons. I'm talking bout 1-15 type yrs
John from Riverside Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 IF we move on from tyrod all options should be on the table
purple haze Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 (edited) If they move on from Tyrod they need to spend the cap savings to re-sign or sign players at Impact positions, draft a QB and let him and Cardale battle it out. Forget the Hoyer's of the world. But if you hated ground and pound the last two years get ready... Edited January 8, 2017 by purple haze
Marty McFly Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 7:58 AM, purple haze said: If they move on from Tyrod they need to spend the cap savings to re-sign or sign players at Impact positions, draft a QB and let him and Cardale battle it out. Forget the Hoyer's of the world. But if you hated ground and pound the last two years get ready... Ugh.... dont even wanna think about bak to bak tank seasons...
GunnerBill Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 I would be after Hoyer Tyrod or no Tyrod. He either gives you a bridge option to start (though is admittedly a slight downgrade.... just not as big of a downgrade as I think the Tyrod lovers believe) or he is a solid vet backup. If the Bears move on from Cutler however I think they will re-sign Hoyer before he hits the market.
BuffaloPride Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 10:22 AM, GunnerBill said: I would be after Hoyer Tyrod or no Tyrod. He either gives you a bridge option to start (though is admittedly a slight downgrade.... just not as big of a downgrade as I think the Tyrod lovers believe) or he is a solid vet backup. If the Bears move on from Cutler however I think they will re-sign Hoyer before he hits the market. Whaleys plan is to get Cutler. His 2 biggest criticisms are trading up for Watkins and over paying for Clay. He feels the moves would be justified if he had a QB who could get them the ball. Not guaranteeing that he gets Cutler but I know thats the plan.
liverpoolkev Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 6:01 AM, KzooMike said: If we don't keep Tyrod we need a veteran presence to compete with Cardale or a potential draft pick. Hoyer is injury prone but has shown some positive things when healthy. QB rating in the 90's in 17 starts the last two years with 25 TD's to 7 INT's. 4 starts this year, before breaking his arm early in his 5th start vs GB. 4 full games games, all over 300 yards passing, 3 games with 2 TD's, no picks. He got his shot with Cleveland, Houston, and Chicago. Not exactly juggernaut offenses. Stat line is trending up fast. I would love to bring Hoyer into the competition. heck no if we need garbage we could keep EJ
Pbomb Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 7:06 AM, NastyNateSoldiers said: Let's give Cordele a shot if he busts that's great for us. We need to blow it up. We need 2 horrible seasons. I'm talking bout 1-15 type yrsso if cardale sucks that is good? Wouldnt it be better for the bills and the fans if he was actually good. If tanking worked every time and so well every team would do it
GunnerBill Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 12:09 PM, liverpoolkev said: heck no if we need garbage we could keep EJ Hoyer is much closer to Tyrod than he is to EJ. Try again.
nucci Posted January 8, 2017 Posted January 8, 2017 On 1/8/2017 at 12:19 PM, Pbomb said: so if cardale sucks that is good? Wouldnt it be better for the bills and the fans if he was actually good. If tanking worked every time and so well every team would do it You must be new....we need to continue to lose to get higher draft choices.......forever
.thumb.png.1b7fb4086290c3afc001a7900b31fab0.png)
Recommended Posts