jaclynrea21 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Two-time Super Bowl-winning coach Tom Coughlin was thought to be a leading candidate to join the Bills either as a coach and/or someone who would oversee their football operations, but the Bills had yet to reach out to him as of Tuesday, The News learned. A source said it was unlikely Coughlin would interview with the team because of his discomfort with working with Whaley. Link http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/03/bills-scheduled-interview-mcdermott-wednesday/
808 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 whaley deserves to finally hire his own coach. every other GM gets to pick their coach yet 4 years in and he's had 2 coaches he did not choose. if he doesn't want coughlin who cares. let him finally get to do his job without russ in there and the coaches falling in love with rex.
KollegeStudnet Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Whaley's position is weird though. Why have a co-GM/GM for almost 5 seasons and he hasn't been able to assist in hiring a coach?!
Estelle Getty Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Whaley's position is weird though. Why have a co-GM/GM for almost 5 seasons and he hasn't been able to assist in hiring a coach?! When he tried to assist his in depth questions put Pegula to sleep. At some point Terry needs to be called out for being the bumbling idiot that he is, money aside.
Buffalo Barbarian Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Whaley knows he would get canned with Tom here.
dezertbill Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Two-time Super Bowl-winning coach Tom Coughlin was thought to be a leading candidate to join the Bills either as a coach and/or someone who would oversee their football operations, but the Bills had yet to reach out to him as of Tuesday, The News learned. A source said it was unlikely Coughlin would interview with the team because of his discomfort with working with Whaley. Link http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/03/bills-scheduled-interview-mcdermott-wednesday/ This comes as no surprise. Zero.
HelloNewman Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 TOM COUGHLIN DOES NOT LIKE DOUG WHALEY Sorry to everyone on this thread. I could not take reading the original title anymore.
xsoldier54 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Two-time Super Bowl-winning coach Tom Coughlin was thought to be a leading candidate to join the Bills either as a coach and/or someone who would oversee their football operations, but the Bills had yet to reach out to him as of Tuesday, The News learned. A source said it was unlikely Coughlin would interview with the team because of his discomfort with working with Whaley. Link http://buffalonews.com/2017/01/03/bills-scheduled-interview-mcdermott-wednesday/ This is all BS. The media just keeps making **** up. The Bills are not interested in Tom Coughlin as coach. They never were. All of this mudslinging at Whaley is getting really old and the BN is not credible when it comes to this subject. They just plain don't like Whaley.
baskingridgebillsfan Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 This is all BS. The media just keeps making **** up. The Bills are not interested in Tom Coughlin as coach. They never were. All of this mudslinging at Whaley is getting really old and the BN is not credible when it comes to this subject. They just plain don't like Whaley. The problem with the News is They didn't like Marrone, they didn't like Rex and they don't like Terry. Bigger issues at play here I believe
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 TOM COUGHLIN DOES NOT LIKE DOUG WHALEY Sorry to everyone on this thread. I could not take reading the original title anymore. OP don't like English
GunnerBill Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Another of Vic's unnamed sources? Jeez, he is really knocking it our of the park at the moment. Why doesn't he stop speculating on the basis of unnamed sources and start doing some real journalism - you know... find credible sources and get them on the record?
CommonCents Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Another of Vic's unnamed sources? Jeez, he is really knocking it our of the park at the moment. Why doesn't he stop speculating on the basis of unnamed sources and start doing some real journalism - you know... find credible sources and get them on the record? Now it's VIC! All of TBN, Peter King, Mike Greenberg, Greg Bedard, Jason Cole, Laconforna, Bill Polian and on and on and everyone that speaks out or writes an article gets bashed on here.
Green Lightning Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 The BN boys still have their panties in a bunch because TP went to the AP instead of them. Prep for more crap-fest stories like this until they can find some other person or thing to vent their bile on. Honestly their behavior is juvenile,
Wayne Arnold Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 But they said Tom Coughlin was a done deal! Whoops!
BarleyNY Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 TOM COUGHLIN DOES NOT LIKE DOUG WHALEY Sorry to everyone on this thread. I could not take reading the original title anymore. I thought it was deft usage of folksy colloquialism.
34-78-83 Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) Truth once again on this one was easy to glean with a little research. The Bills and Pegulas have not spoken with Tom Coughlin since 2015. There is not interest in him as a candidate. More BS Edited January 5, 2017 by 34-78-83
GunnerBill Posted January 5, 2017 Posted January 5, 2017 Now it's VIC! All of TBN, Peter King, Mike Greenberg, Greg Bedard, Jason Cole, Laconforna, Bill Polian and on and on and everyone that speaks out or writes an article gets bashed on here. That's not my point. My point is that Vic keeps publishing articles with unsubstantiated claims from "unnamed sources"..... in two days that has been "Lynn to withdraw from Bills search" which was followed by confirmation that he will interview today and now it is "Coughlin won't speak to the Bills" with nothing that suggests the Bills have even made contact with Coughlin. I've been a journalist. I know how it works. When you publish a story based on "unnamed sources" it either means you don't have a source and are passing off your opinion as someone else's or it means you have someone who tells you something that they themselves have reason not to be attributed. If I publish a story one day based on unnamed sources that doesn't come to fruition I don't publish another one the next day without getting someone on the record - even if that means I hold the story a day.
Recommended Posts