Numark3 Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 (edited) It is on FIRE 21 hours ago, B-Man said: The discussion about disqualifying Sullivan is another delay tactic. The Sullivan review proceedings gain another 6 weeks of delay. The DC Appeals Court is 7 to 4 Democrats to Republicans. The full court should have refused to hear Sullivan’s motion but they vacated the Writ of Mandamus and now they want to use legal procedures and court calendars to chew the fat regarding Sullivan. The DC Court of Appeals is corrupt. If Barr had a SCOTUS without John Roberts, he could appeal to transfer jurisdiction out of DC and into another federal court where a federal judge could hear from Barr and Flynn and dismiss the case in under an hour. POTUS could file a complaint with SCOTUS that the DC courts have shown bad faith. Barr could follow with a motion to put the DC court system in receivership with special masters to oversee and review practices. Meanwhile, Barr could cite bad faith and transfer jurisdiction of all pending cases in DC out of DC. In the meantime, don’t be fooled by the focus on Sullivan. They are playing you. It’s all about delay. lol, they don’t agree with your position so they are corrupt. Must be nice going through life with such an idiotic attitude. one of the most prestigious courts in the world is corrupt, despite having an excellent track record....maybe you should be aware that you have absolutely no skill or ability to judge court decisions? Neither do the other layman trying to follow along Edited August 12, 2020 by Crayola64
Deranged Rhino Posted August 12, 2020 Author Posted August 12, 2020 4 hours ago, Crayola64 said: It is on FIRE lol, they don’t agree with your position so they are corrupt. Must be nice going through life with such an idiotic attitude. one of the most prestigious courts in the world is corrupt, despite having an excellent track record....maybe you should be aware that you have absolutely no skill or ability to judge court decisions? Neither do the other layman trying to follow along But considering your track record down here, that's on brand for you.
3rdnlng Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 5 hours ago, Crayola64 said: It is on FIRE lol, they don’t agree with your position so they are corrupt. Must be nice going through life with such an idiotic attitude. one of the most prestigious courts in the world is corrupt, despite having an excellent track record....maybe you should be aware that you have absolutely no skill or ability to judge court decisions? Neither do the other layman trying to follow along You sound like a priest in Medieval times. Was it in Latin?
Deranged Rhino Posted August 12, 2020 Author Posted August 12, 2020 It's about more than one election... 2
Numark3 Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: You sound like a priest in Medieval times. Was it in Latin? Hmmm, I’m sure an appellate court being corrupt because B-men doesn’t understand their reasoning is totally way more likely than B-men just not understanding things. okkkkkk 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: But considering your track record down here, that's on brand for you. everyone who disagrees with you few is corrupt
Deranged Rhino Posted August 12, 2020 Author Posted August 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: everyone who disagrees with you few is corrupt Not true. But again, you're a proven liar on this board so it's completely on brand for you to continue to lie. 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 Barn burner letter one day, the next day, this: 1
3rdnlng Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 27 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: Hmmm, I’m sure an appellate court being corrupt because B-men doesn’t understand their reasoning is totally way more likely than B-men just not understanding things. okkkkkk everyone who disagrees with you few is corrupt You didn't respond to my comment. My comment(s) referred to your disdain for others by denigrating our collective abilities to understand a court proceeding. It's almost as if you think we need you to interpret those proceedings for us. The references to a Medieval priest and Latin were just examples that may have just went over your head. I hope this post makes it clearer for you. If I ever decide to respond to you again I'll do my best to make it simple.
Numark3 Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 5 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: You didn't respond to my comment. My comment(s) referred to your disdain for others by denigrating our collective abilities to understand a court proceeding. It's almost as if you think we need you to interpret those proceedings for us. The references to a Medieval priest and Latin were just examples that may have just went over your head. I hope this post makes it clearer for you. If I ever decide to respond to you again I'll do my best to make it simple. my disdain is for people who cannot understand it and then make wildly stupid inferences. Don’t confuse me ignoring parts of your posts with them going over my head.
3rdnlng Posted August 12, 2020 Posted August 12, 2020 22 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: my disdain is for people who cannot understand it and then make wildly stupid inferences. Don’t confuse me ignoring parts of your posts with them going over my head. If you weren't going to refer at all to my comments then why did you respond to me?
Deranged Rhino Posted August 12, 2020 Author Posted August 12, 2020 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: Well, he's still hopeful... My sources, some of which overlap, feel as confident as ever -- both in that indictments are happening and a November win. Being on the outside, that confidence hasn't assuaged my anxiety quite yet... ? 2 1
BillStime Posted August 13, 2020 Posted August 13, 2020 Do it - please do it Barr - go after them - all of them - that’s what a banana republic would do.
BillStime Posted August 13, 2020 Posted August 13, 2020 4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Is it signed?
Recommended Posts