Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

Just now, Taro T said:

 

If Suleimani has been dead for years, why would Iran go along with what would have to be the US charade of having killed him a couple of days ago?  That doesn't make sense from here in the cheap seats.

 

The theory goes back to the OP of this thread. 80% of what's being done is being done behind the scenes. 20% is public. The US and its allies (particularly the GCC and Israel) have been successfully waging war (and winning) against the Iranian proxies for 3+ years -- almost all of it unreported. They've destroyed Hezbollah strongholds, and taken out much of Iran's financing (the KSA purge) and logistical capabilities in multiple countries / theaters. The people of Iran have been in open revolt for 2+ years -- and the Mullahs are on the ropes. 

 

They, the Mullahs, had more to gain projecting an image of strength than to admit what was truly happening. And their cut outs in the media and the establishment political class had the same MO. 

 

That he's officially dead, however you wish to get there, is a sign that we're in the end game on this particular topic. The agenda/goal has been to restore power to the people of the region to be able to police their own affairs. Gutting the Mullahs (and before them the Saudis) are crucial steps in that process. One down, one about to go down. 

 

Good times ahead. 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

The theory goes back to the OP of this thread. 80% of what's being done is being done behind the scenes. 20% is public. The US and its allies (particularly the GCC and Israel) have been successfully waging war (and winning) against the Iranian proxies for 3+ years -- almost all of it unreported. They've destroyed Hezbollah strongholds, and taken out much of Iran's financing (the KSA purge) and logistical capabilities in multiple countries / theaters. The people of Iran have been in open revolt for 2+ years -- and the Mullahs are on the ropes. 

 

They, the Mullahs, had more to gain projecting an image of strength than to admit what was truly happening. And their cut outs in the media and the establishment political class had the same MO. 

 

That he's officially dead, however you wish to get there, is a sign that we're in the end game on this particular topic. The agenda/goal has been to restore power to the people of the region to be able to police their own affairs. Gutting the Mullahs (and before them the Saudis) are crucial steps in that process. One down, one about to go down. 

 

Good times ahead. 

 

 

All of that makes sense and thanks again for the heads up on the GCC info which has pretty much been completely ignored by MSM.

 

But it still doesn't make sense why the mullahs would admit he's just been killed if he was really killed 2-3 years ago.  Wouldn't they gain credibility towards calling the US liars if they said we were full of #### and dared us to show the body (which wouldn't be there if he was killed years ago)?

 

On a certain level it makes sense the US would want to wait until now to claim to have killed him.  It projects to the populace of the Arab/Muslim (realizing Iranians aren't Arabs) world that acts of aggression like trying to storm our embassy will be dealt with severely and power/ force is what seems to get people's attention over there.  But why would the Iranians go along with it?  Unless there was something like video of him cowering/ begging for his life when he was killed, just don't see why they'd confirm the story.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hedge said:

I sure this has nothing to do with Leftists getting ratio'd so often now.

 

 

i've no problem with that as long as they make a distinction somehow that lets users know who is responding. maybe a secondary 'checkmark' or some such. you should be able to know if a narrative is being blatantly cultivated.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

/thread

 

 

 

Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha?  

 

Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha?  

 

Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!

 

a Charles I part 2 ending?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha?  

 

Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state.  WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!

  The royal couple are already late to the Islamafication of England.  Plenty of no go zones in England before anybody ever cared about MM.  Europe's failing to maintain replacement of indigenous peoples has open the door for a change in culture of its various nations.  While the Catholic Church was anything but perfect it did cultivate the university system which was a very important step towards modern science.  Imagine what things would have been like if the Muslim population had prevailed during the Crusades reaching all the way into Northern Europe?  Mendel, Galileo, etc. would have been put instantly to death instead of having their discoveries hang around for future generations to consider.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...