Deranged Rhino Posted January 8, 2020 Author Posted January 8, 2020 Just now, Taro T said: If Suleimani has been dead for years, why would Iran go along with what would have to be the US charade of having killed him a couple of days ago? That doesn't make sense from here in the cheap seats. The theory goes back to the OP of this thread. 80% of what's being done is being done behind the scenes. 20% is public. The US and its allies (particularly the GCC and Israel) have been successfully waging war (and winning) against the Iranian proxies for 3+ years -- almost all of it unreported. They've destroyed Hezbollah strongholds, and taken out much of Iran's financing (the KSA purge) and logistical capabilities in multiple countries / theaters. The people of Iran have been in open revolt for 2+ years -- and the Mullahs are on the ropes. They, the Mullahs, had more to gain projecting an image of strength than to admit what was truly happening. And their cut outs in the media and the establishment political class had the same MO. That he's officially dead, however you wish to get there, is a sign that we're in the end game on this particular topic. The agenda/goal has been to restore power to the people of the region to be able to police their own affairs. Gutting the Mullahs (and before them the Saudis) are crucial steps in that process. One down, one about to go down. Good times ahead. 2
Taro T Posted January 8, 2020 Posted January 8, 2020 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: The theory goes back to the OP of this thread. 80% of what's being done is being done behind the scenes. 20% is public. The US and its allies (particularly the GCC and Israel) have been successfully waging war (and winning) against the Iranian proxies for 3+ years -- almost all of it unreported. They've destroyed Hezbollah strongholds, and taken out much of Iran's financing (the KSA purge) and logistical capabilities in multiple countries / theaters. The people of Iran have been in open revolt for 2+ years -- and the Mullahs are on the ropes. They, the Mullahs, had more to gain projecting an image of strength than to admit what was truly happening. And their cut outs in the media and the establishment political class had the same MO. That he's officially dead, however you wish to get there, is a sign that we're in the end game on this particular topic. The agenda/goal has been to restore power to the people of the region to be able to police their own affairs. Gutting the Mullahs (and before them the Saudis) are crucial steps in that process. One down, one about to go down. Good times ahead. All of that makes sense and thanks again for the heads up on the GCC info which has pretty much been completely ignored by MSM. But it still doesn't make sense why the mullahs would admit he's just been killed if he was really killed 2-3 years ago. Wouldn't they gain credibility towards calling the US liars if they said we were full of #### and dared us to show the body (which wouldn't be there if he was killed years ago)? On a certain level it makes sense the US would want to wait until now to claim to have killed him. It projects to the populace of the Arab/Muslim (realizing Iranians aren't Arabs) world that acts of aggression like trying to storm our embassy will be dealt with severely and power/ force is what seems to get people's attention over there. But why would the Iranians go along with it? Unless there was something like video of him cowering/ begging for his life when he was killed, just don't see why they'd confirm the story. 1
DC Tom Posted January 8, 2020 Posted January 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Yes, it's the same foreign policy principle Clinton pursued with North Korea: "Just don't do anything during our administration, and we'll reward you." 1
Hedge Posted January 8, 2020 Posted January 8, 2020 (edited) I am sure this has nothing to do with Leftists getting ratio'd so often now. Edited January 8, 2020 by Hedge 3
Foxx Posted January 8, 2020 Posted January 8, 2020 6 minutes ago, Hedge said: I sure this has nothing to do with Leftists getting ratio'd so often now. i've no problem with that as long as they make a distinction somehow that lets users know who is responding. maybe a secondary 'checkmark' or some such. you should be able to know if a narrative is being blatantly cultivated. 1
row_33 Posted January 8, 2020 Posted January 8, 2020 haven't been on for years now, not missing any of it 1
Hedge Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 There has been quite the confluence of events into the last week. 3 2
John Adams Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, row_33 said: haven't been on for years now, not missing any of it DR reposts about 85% of Twitter's content here. The other 15% is Kardashians. Edited January 9, 2020 by John Adams 1
DC Tom Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 30 minutes ago, John Adams said: /thread Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha? Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!!
Warren Zevon Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 Meghan Markle has been dead since 2015. Find a video of her talking about Trump since then. You can't. 2
row_33 Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha? Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! a Charles I part 2 ending?
RochesterRob Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: Meghan Markle's wearing a burkha? Clearly, they're "stepping back from their roles" to establish themselves as the #Resistance to Boris Johnson's government, and are planning on staging a coup and turning England into an Islamic state. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!!! The royal couple are already late to the Islamafication of England. Plenty of no go zones in England before anybody ever cared about MM. Europe's failing to maintain replacement of indigenous peoples has open the door for a change in culture of its various nations. While the Catholic Church was anything but perfect it did cultivate the university system which was a very important step towards modern science. Imagine what things would have been like if the Muslim population had prevailed during the Crusades reaching all the way into Northern Europe? Mendel, Galileo, etc. would have been put instantly to death instead of having their discoveries hang around for future generations to consider.
Nanker Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 (edited) 20 hours ago, Kevbeau said: The replies are brutal. “Boomer just as good with tech as he is economics” is my favorite Edited January 9, 2020 by Nanker
DC Tom Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 2 hours ago, Gary Busey said: holy black eyes "My TV needs to be color balanced! IMPEACH!!!!" 2
Warren Zevon Posted January 9, 2020 Posted January 9, 2020 49 minutes ago, DC Tom said: "My TV needs to be color balanced! I'M PEACH!!!!" Trump quote?
Recommended Posts