Deranged Rhino Posted December 16, 2019 Author Share Posted December 16, 2019 What's that you say? A secret, ongoing case involving the Imrans? Naaaaaah... The Department of Justice said this month that it could not release records on Democrat technology aide Imran Awan due to “technical difficulties,” but later admitted in court documents that it could not release records on him because there is a secret ongoing case related to the matter. https://www.dailywire.com/news/scandal-reopens-court-papers-on-democrat-it-aide-imran-awan-make-new-revelation 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snafu Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 7 hours ago, Gavin in Va Beach said: He still believes his only hope of avoiding persecution is that the Democrat/Mainstream Media narrative will hold up, and that he must keep pushing it else people start to turn on him. If he hides he could give someone else like Brennan ammunition to pin everything on him. As long as the music keeps playing, Comey and all those slimey bastards will keep going around the circle, hoping that when it stops they have a chair to sit on. What would be better is when the music stops they all pick up the chairs and start mercilessly beating each other with them. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Musharraf treason case: Special court hands death penalty to former military ruler 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Where have I heard this theory before? Quote Now that his impeachment work is over, here’s a new assignment for Adam Schiff: To investigate whether the bad intel in the Christopher Steele dossier was there because the former British spy was a sloppy partisan—or because he was the patsy in a Russian disinformation campaign. As chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Mr. Schiff is plainly the man for the job. Such an investigation fits comfortably with his oft-stated complaint that Vladimir Putin interfered in the 2016 presidential election and will do so again in 2020 if we don’t stop him. Meanwhile, the allegation that the Steele “dossier” was a product of Russian disinformation comes from one of Mr. Schiff’s own star witnesses, Fiona Hill. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warren Zevon Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Edited December 17, 2019 by Foxx 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 43 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: "Obama didn't do that for personal benefit." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 16 minutes ago, DC Tom said: "Obama didn't do that for personal benefit." I'd be curious to find out exactly where and to who those pallets of cash went. Seems like the old regime not only was pretty tight with Iran but remains so. The 1.8 billion in cash pales in comparison to the 150 billion in assets that got released. What really was its purpose? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 12 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I'd be curious to find out exactly where and to who those pallets of cash went. Seems like the old regime not only was pretty tight with Iran but remains so. The 1.8 billion in cash pales in comparison to the 150 billion in assets that got released. What really was its purpose? Every time you buy a bottle of ketchup, Iran gets a nickel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: I'd be curious to find out exactly where and to who those pallets of cash went. Seems like the old regime not only was pretty tight with Iran but remains so. The 1.8 billion in cash pales in comparison to the 150 billion in assets that got released. What really was its purpose? So Iran didn't build a nuke..,like they are doing now Remember, Trump demanded Iran stay in the Obama agreement...,after Trump pulled out of it!! Can you process that? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Tiberius said: 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 Deep state! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tiberius said: So Iran didn't build a nuke..,like they are doing now Remember, Trump demanded Iran stay in the Obama agreement...,after Trump pulled out of it!! Can you process that? Your posts make a fine fertilizer. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Your posts make a fine fertilizer. Whatever Trump supporter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 Bring it. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fisa-court-slams-fbi-over-surveillance-applications-in-rare-public-order 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 Uh-oh... the last thing the coup plotters want is for the FISC to go back through old cases/warrant applications... 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted December 17, 2019 Share Posted December 17, 2019 i was wondering if the FISC would have any public reaction. glad to see that they do they cannot be very happy with how they look in all of this. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted December 17, 2019 Author Share Posted December 17, 2019 5 minutes ago, Foxx said: i was wondering if the FISC would have any public reaction. glad to see that they do they cannot be very happy with how they look in all of this. This is a needed move if there's going to be any real reform. The fact they're piping up now gives me a bit more confidence they're planning on taking this beyond just "talk". 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts