transplantbillsfan Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 I think it's bizarre that people like @Deranged Rhino are claiming they've already read all 476 pages of a report that was literally released today. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, transplantbillsfan said: I think it's bizarre that people like @Deranged Rhino are claiming they've already read all 476 pages of a report that was literally released today. It's not bizarre since I didn't claim that at all. What is also not bizarre is that you're RUNNING from questions you can't answer. A smarter person might ask themselves why they don't have an answer to a question as fundamental as "who is Mifsud and why does he matter"... but not you. You're revealing in your own ignorance as if it were a badge of honor. It's not. I've been well prepped for this. I've done lots of work to prepare. When you do that, it's amazing how fast you can cut through the spin, especially while reading the primary source document for yourself while the spin is happening. 3
transplantbillsfan Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's not bizarre since I didn't claim that at all. You didn't? You asked me if I read the report. That's really only a relevant question if you did. Did you? If not, why'd you ask me the question? Seems you're relying on secondary sources--random twitter folks--to interpret it for you. How is that better than some of us who are reading interpretations of it from other secondary sources that are at least credible news outlets? 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 Just now, transplantbillsfan said: If not, why'd you ask me the question? Because you made a conclusion about the document and Barr that's not backed by the document itself, as if you read it. You didn't read a word of it. 1 minute ago, transplantbillsfan said: Seems you're relying on secondary sources--random twitter folks--to interpret it for you. How is that better than some of us who are reading interpretations of it from other secondary sources that are at least credible news outlets? Wrong. Now... stop running and answer the question posed to you. Who is Mifsud and why does his name matter? **************** Just kind of a major deal here. No worries. 1 2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 (edited) This goes here too because it's too funny not to share: 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: (but it's all fake) It's real, it works. You can verify it for yourself. Edited December 9, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 1 2
3rdnlng Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 42 minutes ago, Gary Busey said: I swear I am JA - I swear Quit dreaming. 1
John Adams Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 45 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's his go-to question for all his alts (Gary asks that a lot, as did BM, as does JA) but he SWEARS he's not those people. Someone besides me asks that of you, kind of all conspiracists? Pretty sure I was first on the scene with that one but maybe others have copied it. Makes sense since you're afraid to answer. Also, good job ignoring me.
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 26 minutes ago, transplantbillsfan said: How is that better than some of us who are reading interpretations of it from other secondary sources that are at least credible news outlets? 24 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Now... stop running and answer the question posed to you. Who is Mifsud and why does his name matter? Crickets still. Why won't you answer a fundamental question about this entire saga? Could it be because you don't know who Mifsud is or why he matters? And if you don't know that, again fundamental part of the story, why don't you? Could it be the "credible" news outlets you're clinging to have kept it from you?
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 He was always a traitor to this country. From day one. Glad he's gone and even more glad history will remember him for the slime that he is. ********* Another JA/Gary/Tibs narrative gets killed (again) Never went to Prague. If he never went to Prague, the entire hacking/collusion story goes bye-bye... yet they got several renewals after this was disproven. Why? Because this wasn't about stopping Trump/Russia. It was about overthrowing a legally elected POTUS because they disagreed with the peoples' vote. 2 1
4merper4mer Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 Is the Deep State War over now? Guessing who lost again. Us. Limp Horowtitz spent years developing nothing of value or substance despite having the resources and foundation to do so. He's like the Jason Botterill of inspectors. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 14 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Is the Deep State War over now? Not by any measure. 1
Hedge Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: This goes here too because it's too funny not to share: It's real, it works. You can verify it for yourself. It's actually just the "rn" combination that is triggering the search results. (You can just search for "rn" and Comey and other instances of actual "rn"s are shown.) At times, text searches can be treated loosely to account for multiple criteria, one of which could be user error. In this case, where 2 consecutive letters can look like a third letter, it is within the realm conceivability this was the reason it was done. (I don't have a copy of Adobe Acrobat, but I think you can accomplish this through manipulating embedded indexes.) This specific search functionality, however, does indeed appear to be unique to today's report. I've looked at some other recent IG PDF reports (including the Comey specific report that came out in Aug) and "rn" only returns actual "rn" values. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted December 9, 2019 Author Posted December 9, 2019 https://mobile.twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1204172387475787776 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 7 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://mobile.twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1204172387475787776 Let's see if anyone gets charged (well, except Ohr and Strzok who are *****) before we start talking prison time. 1
4merper4mer Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 23 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not by any measure. Sadly, it actually is over. Summary: People with lap dogs can blatantly avert public scrutiny by having their own non-secure email servers holding national secrets for everyone in the world to see EXCEPT the US public. Lap dogs can investigate the opponents of their owners with impunity based on known false documents. Fake oversight can give obtuse opinions about lap dogs conveniently leaving many points open to interpretation even when the raw data is clear. Beardy McGee can be called in late to be phase two of doing nothing. Lather, rinse repeat.
DC Tom Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 15 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's really bizarre, how many people I see saying "See, this exonerates everyone!" Uh...no, it doesn't. That's not what I read, at all. The report says, point-blank, that the professional conduct of everyone involved should be scrutinized. 13 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Sadly, it actually is over. Summary: People with lap dogs can blatantly avert public scrutiny by having their own non-secure email servers holding national secrets for everyone in the world to see EXCEPT the US public. Lap dogs can investigate the opponents of their owners with impunity based on known false documents. Fake oversight can give obtuse opinions about lap dogs conveniently leaving many points open to interpretation even when the raw data is clear. Beardy McGee can be called in late to be phase two of doing nothing. Lather, rinse repeat. This is actually correct.
keepthefaith Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 8 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Sadly, it actually is over. Summary: People with lap dogs can blatantly avert public scrutiny by having their own non-secure email servers holding national secrets for everyone in the world to see EXCEPT the US public. Lap dogs can investigate the opponents of their owners with impunity based on known false documents. Fake oversight can give obtuse opinions about lap dogs conveniently leaving many points open to interpretation even when the raw data is clear. Beardy McGee can be called in late to be phase two of doing nothing. Lather, rinse repeat. While I believe there will be indictments, a big risk now is running out the clock. It's easy to see this all getting buried if Trump is not re-elected. The justice and court system moves painfully slowly and we're only 13 months or so from the possibility of another AG being sworn in and Barr being neutered. Carter Page at the very least though will keep some version of this afloat.
Foxx Posted December 9, 2019 Posted December 9, 2019 9 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: While I believe there will be indictments, a big risk now is running out the clock. It's easy to see this all getting buried if Trump is not re-elected. The justice and court system moves painfully slowly and we're only 13 months or so from the possibility of another AG being sworn in and Barr being neutered. Carter Page at the very least though will keep some version of this afloat. i dunno.... once the horse has left the barn, it can be quite hard to get it back in in some instances. the 100th monkey is awakening.
Recommended Posts