The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:

[Foxx]

41 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Nope.  It'll be sanitized from the history books.

that entirely depends upon whom the victors are in this epic battle.

[Numark3]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

that entirely depends upon whom the victors are in this epic battle.

but what if the battle doesn’t exist?

[Foxx]

1 hour ago, Cinga said:

Screw that redacted bull#### on the whistleblower's name! He/She has accused the President of the United States of wrongdoing and if this is going to trial in the Senate, the American People have a right, and NEED TO KNOW who thew accuser is, as well as anyone he/she supposedly got info from, the second and third hand sources.

 

I'll be damned if there is going to be an impeachment without the subject, Trump, and us knowing who the accuser is!

 

no worries. if it does go to trial in the Senate, they are going to have a field day with the, 'hearsay'. if, that is... it is even allowed to be submitted as evidence.

[Numark3]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

no worries. if it does go to trial in the Senate, they are going to have a field day with the, 'hearsay'. if, that is... it is even allowed to be submitted as evidence.

Now you’re getting closer to the main point

[Foxx]

9 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

oh, being ignorant of dumb conspiracy theories is absolutely the way to go through life.  Ask me why flat earthers think the earth is flat, and my answer is “I don’t know, nor do I want to know.”  Show me a person who knows, and I’ll show you someone who could have spent their time better.

 

it is way worse to be ignorant of the fact the theory you believe in is a figment if your imagination.  That’s the ignorance you have, and I’m sorry I find it funny

I know you only talk about things you don’t really understand, but you should work in stopping it.  People will laugh at you less.

right, because history is a barren wasteland when it comes to the government lying to people in the past. every single damn thing the government has told you has been 100% complete truth.

 

[Numark3]

Just now, Foxx said:

right, because history is a barren wasteland when it comes to the government lying to people in the past. every single damn thing the government has told you has been 100% complete truth.

 

 

 

I mean, look who disagrees with my point!  A 9/11 truther.  Point proven, thanks.  

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

right, because history is a barren wasteland when it comes to the government lying to people in the past. every single damn thing the government has told you has been 100% complete truth.

 

 

It's hilarious that: 

1) He still thinks I'm reading his screed. I'm not. 

and

2) That he thinks boasting about his own ignorance is a winning argument. 

 

This is the same guy who said it was sad for an adult to care about his country. 

 

He's a joke. With nothing to offer. 

[Foxx]

7 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

but what if the battle doesn’t exist?

come on... are you going to seriously try to imbrue your idiocy by saying there is not a battle for the republic going on?

[DC Tom]

11 minutes ago, Foxx said:

that entirely depends upon whom the victors are in this epic battle.

 

Not really.  Neither side's going to want this publicized much.

[Numark3]

Just now, Foxx said:

come on... are you going to seriously try to imbrue your idiocy by saying there is not a battle for the republic going on?

not how you all have it framed

[Foxx]

Just now, Crayola64 said:

not how you all have it framed

there you go again, moving the goal posts.  please stop being disingenuous.

[DC Tom]

26 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

trust me, I have no plans on engaging anyone on the substance of these conspiracy theories.  They are loony

 

A priori dismissal of evidence based on the a priori assumption of a lack of evidence.

 

Even I read ***** that's obvious nonsense, so I can explicitly point out where it's obvious nonsense without resorting to "You're a poopy-head!" like you are.  Perhaps they have a class on that at your community college?

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, Foxx said:

there you go again, moving the goal posts.  please stop being disingenuous.

 

He can't. 

 

He's not an honest person. He's proven this with every post. 

 

He's also not an informed person. He's proven this with every post. 

 

He's here to make fun of people who care about their country. That's it. 

[Foxx]

3 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

 

I mean, look who disagrees with my point!  A 9/11 truther.  Point proven, thanks.  

if it comes down to being someone who does not agree with the official narrative of 9/11 or one who would be injected with syphilis and told it was a harmless test.... yes, please, i'll be the one who questions the government all day/everyday. 

[Deranged Rhino]

Just now, DC Tom said:

 

A priori dismissal of evidence based on the a priori assumption of a lack of evidence.

 

Even I read ***** that's obvious nonsense, so I can explicitly point out where it's obvious nonsense without resorting to "You're a poopy-head!" like you are.  Perhaps they have a class on that at your community college?

 

That's the funniest part. 

 

If he's SO convinced he's right, reading a government document, in his (alleged) field, would be an easy way to point out precisely WHY and HOW the analysis is loony. 

 

But he won't do it. Either because he's lying about having a background in law and doesn't want to expose that by reading a legal document -- or because he's a dishonest asshat who has no intention of adding anything of substance to the board or the conversation. 

 

Either way, he's proven himself to be a clown -- and deserves to be treated as such or ignored outright. 

[Numark3]

2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

if it comes down to being someone who does not agree with the official narrative of 9/11 or one who would be injected with syphilis and told it was a harmless test.... yes, please, i'll be the one who questions the government all day/everyday. 

there is an option (c) beyond being (a) dumb or (b) taken advantages of 

[DC Tom]

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

That's the funniest part. 

 

If he's SO convinced he's right, reading a government document, in his (alleged) field, would be an easy way to point out precisely WHY and HOW the analysis is loony. 

 

But he won't do it. Either because he's lying about having a background in law and doesn't want to expose that by reading a legal document -- or because he's a dishonest asshat who has no intention of adding anything of substance to the board or the conversation. 

 

Either way, he's proven himself to be a clown -- and deserves to be treated as such or ignored outright. 

 

You forgot: he's an honest asshat, who's being completely honest about having no intention of adding anything of substance to the board or this conversation.

[Tiberius]

10 minutes ago, Foxx said:

come on... are you going to seriously try to imbrue your idiocy by saying there is not a battle for the republic going on?

Yup, the Democrats are fight for the Republic and the rule of law and the party of Trump is using the laws of the Republic to try and subvert said Republic. 

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

You forgot: he's an honest asshat, who's being completely honest about having no intention of adding anything of substance to the board or this conversation.

That sounds more like you. Seriously, you just described yourself. Wow. 

 

#Tomhasissues 

[Numark3]

8 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

A priori dismissal of evidence based on the a priori assumption of a lack of evidence.

 

Even I read ***** that's obvious nonsense, so I can explicitly point out where it's obvious nonsense without resorting to "You're a poopy-head!" like you are.  Perhaps they have a class on that at your community college?

Your reaching is enjoyable. you repeating false insults really gets to me lol.

 

and to think you a smart published (while in school) professional!

[Foxx]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Yup, the Democrats are fight for the Republic and the rule of law and the party of Trump is using the laws of the Republic to try and subvert said Republic. ...

don't ever stop, Tibsy. you let me know i am over the target. 

 

#rulesforradicals