Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Following along, I saw you could not be bothered to read any source documents, but "as an attorney " *cough*yeahright*cough* that is normally the first course of action when determining truth versus lies. I am curious as to what you see your roll as in PPP? Concerned troll? Simply a troll? Village idiot? ? do you need to see documents to laugh and discount flat earth theories? Do you need to see the photographs to know Bigfoot is fake? Or do you lack the very basic ability to smell patent BS? its not that I’m “not a serious” person or whatever that means. Or that I’m trolling. It’s that this is laughably dumb Idea that normal people don’t engage with. we all have our dumb hobbies. I like real housewives and bravo tv. You all like to engage with idiotic conspiracy theories that are rooted in middle-school reddit. Edited October 1, 2019 by Crayola64
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Author Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Following along, I saw you could not be bothered to read any source documents, but "as an attorney " *cough*yeahright*cough* that is normally the first course of action when determining truth versus lies. I am curious as to what you see your roll as in PPP? Concerned troll? Simply a troll? Village idiot? ? It's even worse than him not being bothered to read sources for himself, he calls reading primary source material things "conspiracy nuts do". He's not a serious person. He knows zero about this subject, has done none of the work himself, and yet he's desperate to mock this topic. Why? Because he's a joke. 1
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's even worse than him not being bothered to read sources for himself, he calls reading primary source material things "conspiracy nuts do". He's not a serious person. He knows zero about this subject, has done none of the work himself, and yet he's desperate to mock this topic. Why? Because he's a joke. you have trouble not understanding anything that challenges your little thoughts. Your analysis of the documents are nutty, not the document. I know you can’t really distinguish between concepts, but try and figure out the difference serious internet person
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: do you need to see documents to laugh and discount flat earth theories? Do you need to see the photographs to know Bigfoot is fake? Or do you lack the very basic ability to smell patent BS? I do, but clearly you do not if you bought into the Russia, Russia, Russia! bull####, not recognizing the Obama/Biden/Clinton pay-for-play corruption (at minimum), the DNC server scam, the Five-eyes election meddling in 2016, etc., etc. If a schlump like me can read and understand the source documents, a "big time attorney" *cough*yeahright*cough* like you can do the same. ? Edited October 1, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Author Posted October 1, 2019 Programming note: It's the second anniversary of the Las Vegas Shooting... still no motive given to the biggest mass shooting in US history. Funny how that works, isn't it? (Don't ask. Nothing to see here.) 3
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I do, but clearly you do not if you bought into the Russia, Russia, Russia! bull####, not recognizing the Obama/Biden/Clinton pay-for-play corruption (at minimum), the DNC server scam, the Five-eyes election meddling in 2016, etc., etc. If a schlump like me can read and understand the source documents, a "big time attorney" *cough*yeahright*cough* like you can do the same. ? i didn’t buy into and I am on record as saying as such here and those insults only work if I was lying lol Edited October 1, 2019 by Crayola64
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Author Posted October 1, 2019 Just now, Buffalo_Gal said: I do, but clearly you do not if you bought into the Russia, Russia, Russia! bull####, not recognizing the Obama/Biden/Clinton pay-for-play corruption (at minimum), the DNC server scam, the Five-eyes election meddling in 2016, etc., etc. If a schlump like me can read and understand the source documents, a "big time attorney" *cough*yeahright*cough* like you can do the same. ? He's just proving he's not a serious person. A serious person does not equate a memo of opinion from the FISC to "flat Earth" or "bigfoot". The FISC is real, it has incredible power and runs entirely in secret. He's an "attorney" who thinks a legal document from our secret court about the 2016 election is not a serious document... ... because he's not a serious person and has nothing to offer this conversation or this community. He's a joke. And he knows he's a joke. He's just too much of a coward to change his ways. 1 1
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: i didn’t buy into and I am on record as saying as such here and those insults only work if I was lying lol Insults? I am the sweetest person in the dungeon, if I do say so myself. ? 1 2
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 This discussion is for serious people only!!! No non-serious people allowed!!! maybe you are in middle school? 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Insults? I am the sweetest person in the dungeon, if I do say so myself. ? you all are certainly harmless.
Tiberius Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's even worse than him not being bothered to read sources for himself, he calls reading primary source material things "conspiracy nuts do". He's not a serious person. He knows zero about this subject, has done none of the work himself, and yet he's desperate to mock this topic. Why? Because he's a joke. But he isn't the conspiracy theory person.
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 Just now, Tiberius said: But he isn't the conspiracy theory person. but I’m not a serious person, which is worse!
Buffalo_Gal Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Crayola64 said: This discussion is for serious people only!!! No non-serious people allowed!!! maybe you are in middle school? you all are certainly harmless. I, and (nearly) everyone else down here wish you no harm. I, however, do wish you would get a clue and read the source documents - assuming you are not a troll or the PPP village idiot (Tibs would hate to relinquish that role). I will probably not engage you further as you have given no signs of being down here for anything other that ***** and giggles (your own). Have a good evening. ? Edited October 1, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal damn homonyms 1
Tiberius Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Crayola64 said: but I’m not a serious person, which is worse! I'll have to read all 600 pages of documents to decide if you are serious! 1
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said: I, and (nearly) everyone else down here wish you no harm. I, however, do wish you would get a clue and read the source documents - assuming you are not a troll or the PPP village idiot (Tibs would hate to relinquish that roll). I will probably not engage you further as you have given no signs of being down here for anything other that ***** and giggles (your own). Have a good evening. ? trust me, I have no plans on engaging anyone on the substance of these conspiracy theories. They are loony
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Author Posted October 1, 2019 Bragging about being ignorant is no way to go through life. It's a disinformation war first and foremost. You either do the work yourself, or outsource it to others. In this environment, outsourcing your critical thinking and analysis skills to proven liars is something people do who wish to remain ignorant. Not informed. That's the lot you've chosen. And that's why you're both mocked. It's entirely deserved.
TakeYouToTasker Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: you have trouble not understanding anything that challenges your little thoughts. Your analysis of the documents are nutty, not the document. I know you can’t really distinguish between concepts, but try and figure out the difference serious internet person “Said the man, without even a trace of irony.” Edited October 1, 2019 by TakeYouToTasker 1 1
3rdnlng Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Crayola64 said: trust me, I have no plans on engaging anyone on the substance of these conspiracy theories. They are loony Have you ever wondered why you only got to sit in the 3rd chair once? Maybe the last page or so here could give you a clue. Edited October 1, 2019 by 3rdnlng 1
Deranged Rhino Posted October 1, 2019 Author Posted October 1, 2019 Just now, TakeYouToTasker said: “Said the man, without even a trace of irony.” The "analysis of the docs are nutty" -- said by a man who admits he hasn't read the docs. So how does he know for sure? He doesn't. Because he's too scared to read the docs for himself and use his own critical thinking skills to PROVE my analysis is wrong. (Hint: he can't prove it's wrong). He's a joke, an intellectual coward, and a waste of carbon.
Tiberius Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 @Deranged Rhino Is Hillary still an active member of the Deep State? Asking for a friend 1
Numark3 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Bragging about being ignorant is no way to go through life. It's a disinformation war first and foremost. You either do the work yourself, or outsource it to others. In this environment, outsourcing your critical thinking and analysis skills to proven liars is something people do who wish to remain ignorant. Not informed. That's the lot you've chosen. And that's why you're both mocked. It's entirely deserved. oh, being ignorant of dumb conspiracy theories is absolutely the way to go through life. Ask me why flat earthers think the earth is flat, and my answer is “I don’t know, nor do I want to know.” Show me a person who knows, and I’ll show you someone who could have spent their time better. it is way worse to be ignorant of the fact the theory you believe in is a figment if your imagination. That’s the ignorance you have, and I’m sorry I find it funny 6 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Have you ever wondered why you only got to sit in the 3rd chair once? Maybe the last page or so here could give you a clue. I know you only talk about things you don’t really understand, but you should work in stopping it. People will laugh at you less.
Recommended Posts