Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Foxx said:

long thread.

as always, use your discernment and take what works for you.

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1177678378561933313

 



Not surprising news to those who have followed this - it was always going to be reported as political persecution and a partisan politics (because, you know, the deep state coup-peeps weren't at all political or partisan ?). 

One thing she is saying different is that Comey will be charged. What has been coming out lately is Comey and Brennan will not be charged. That thread contradicts those rumors.  And, that this may be drawn out for maximum political impact. I'm not so sure that is a great idea. We shall see which way this goes #soon. 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)

when the AG declined to seek charges against Comey in anyway with the Comey Report, i felt betrayed. i mean, here is a leader of one of the supposes hallowed institutions of this great country and he breaks the law by leaking material that is/was classified information. and, from all appearances, did so to expedite the current ongoing soft coup against the duly elected President of the United States that facilitated a circuitous validation loop. if that is not a high crime, i don't know what is. granted and i understand that they may have done so to seek greater charges, but just going by past experiences, that there is the possibility of the old boys network just sweeping it all under the rug should not be surprising at all because it has happened more than once in the past.

 

this possibility is what has what has caused me to become disillusioned and somewhat mad at myself for allowing myself to be tricked by the dog and pony show that, somehow, this time, things were going to be different. hope that the rule of law would be restored. stepping back and looking at what the rule of law has become, not only for the elite but the average man and it's bending meaning of it everyday and what that means for the average man... it is readily apparent, to me, that we are *****.

 

having said that, i am ever the eternal optimist. so as i get over being let down, my hope is renewing that i am wrong and that justice for the common man will prevail and that equal justice will again rule the land. whereby making it possible to root out the evil corruption that has infested the great halls of this sacred country. if it doesn't, we don't deserve to have this country and we deserve everything we have coming for we will no better than what has existed throughout known history.

 

the 12th can't get here fast enough for me.

Edited by Foxx
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
31 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

So is Liz Iriquois or Seneca?

You no spellum Iroquois right. Regardless, she was born in Oklahoma and claimed Cherokee heritage.

Posted
11 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

You left the best part out.

This is a family friendly forum. I presume you meant "tramps" but there's more to it than that:

 

"But every night all the men would come around
And lay their money down"

Posted
Just now, 3rdnlng said:

This is a family friendly forum. I presume you meant "tramps" but there's more to it than that:

 

"But every night all the men would come around
And lay their money down"

Orchids of Oklahoma?

Posted
16 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said:

Sounds like she'd make a good OC if Daboll leaves.

She can be offensive enough but Barbara Streisand is probably more qualified. Madonna can be the OL coach because she's very experienced down in the trenches. Kathy Griffin can be the tackling dummy because well, there ain't much harm that you can do to her.

Posted
47 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Yeah, this goes here too because it exposes the club once again: 

 

 

Wow. I'm not sure if that guy has his head so far up his ass he actually believes that nonsense or if he's got the greatest deadpan joke delivery ever.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted

 

^^^^^ did Bloomberg start of by saying it is okay for China to burn coal because they don’t do it near their cities?

And THEN he says Xi listens to the voices of his “constituents” when making policy decisions?

 

Holy crap.  Is this a prelude to the Presidential race when it comes down to a D candidate vs Trump?  How is that answer good or believable?

 

  • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...