Warren Zevon Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 Just now, DC Tom said: Which law? In-law!
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Author Posted September 25, 2019 And now Trump has the media falling over themselves trying to figure out why Crowdstrike would have Hillary's emails in the Ukraine. Because they NEVER bothered to investigate what Crowdstrike truly is, or its purpose. 3
Warren Zevon Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Hmmm Nah. You've linked multiple tweets to that story about a dozen times and the "document" has yet to come out. Take a chill pill
Deranged Rhino Posted September 25, 2019 Author Posted September 25, 2019 https://abc7.com/submarine-found-in-pacific-with-$165m-in-cocaine-coast-guard-says/5564786/ 1
B-Man Posted September 25, 2019 Posted September 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: https://abc7.com/submarine-found-in-pacific-with-$165m-in-cocaine-coast-guard-says/5564786/ The Fowl Fiends ! ............. 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 26, 2019 Author Posted September 26, 2019 It's always been a coup. Always. Never substantive nor real, but inventions and tricks of light and shadow to try to build the appearance of objectivity. Schiff sunk himself today. And Ed Buck's money won't save him this time around. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted September 26, 2019 Author Posted September 26, 2019 But it's all fake -- and none of this (thread) is real... Now do the PRI/US Congress ties please. 2
Foxx Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 more Donner Party madness. https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1177303833845862400 4
John Adams Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: A guy reporting what he thinks is questionable behavior (sitting president pressuring another country's president to investigate his main political rival--something we now know happened) is not evidence of a Deep State conspiracy. And if his complaint is to be believed, he wasn't alone in his concerns about what happened. He filed a complaint because he sensed something was wrong in the government, which is exactly what the Whistleblower laws are all about.
Deranged Rhino Posted September 26, 2019 Author Posted September 26, 2019 Just now, John Adams said: A guy reporting what he thinks is questionable behavior (sitting president pressuring another country's president to investigate his main political rival--something we now know happened) is not evidence of a Deep State conspiracy. And if his complaint is to be believed, he wasn't alone in his concerns about what happened. He filed a complaint because he sensed something was wrong in the government, which is exactly what the Whistleblower laws are all about. It is when he works for Brennan -- and his allegations have fallen flat, without evidence or a crime.
John Adams Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said: It is when he works for Brennan -- and his allegations have fallen flat, without evidence or a crime. Fallen flat. The president withheld aid. Brought up how much aid he gives to Ukraine. Asked for the favor of investigating his leading rival. Has had his lawyer all over Ukraine to investigate Biden. (If Rudy goes under oath and talks, look out. That guy could say anything. He's like Biden but more unpredictable.) The above statements are true.
B-Man Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 1 minute ago, John Adams said: Fallen flat. The president withheld aid. Brought up how much aid he gives to Ukraine. Asked for the favor of investigating his leading rival. Has had his lawyer all over Ukraine to investigate Biden. (If Rudy goes under oath and talks, look out. That guy could say anything. He's like Biden but more unpredictable.) The above statements are true. Are PARTIALLY true.....................as I am sure you are aware. . 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted September 26, 2019 Author Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: The president withheld aid. Not proven, by any means and likely untrue. That's KEY to the whole thing. 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: Asked for the favor of investigating his leading rival. False. The favor was asked about the 2016 election, not Joe Biden. There were 500+ words between those statements. 500+. 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: Has had his lawyer all over Ukraine to investigate Biden. (If Rudy goes under oath and talks, look out. That guy could say anything. He's like Biden but more unpredictable.) The UKRAINE (through State) requested Rudy, not Trump. 2 minutes ago, John Adams said: The above statements are true. You got one out of four correct. The others are speculation which remain unproven or have otherwise been proven false. Edited September 26, 2019 by Deranged Rhino
John Adams Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 (edited) 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: Are PARTIALLY true.....................as I am sure you are aware. . Do you take the position that Rudy Giuliani is a stable guy you'd like defending POTUS under oath. The rest are true. 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Not proven, by any means and likely untrue. That's KEY to the whole thing. Did Trump say he withheld the aid? Answer is YES. 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: False. The favor was asked about the 2016 election, not Joe Biden. There were 500+ words between those statements. 500+. Are you shitting me? He asked about the Bidens by name! Based on how wrong you've been about the "transcript" in the last few days (Remember saying Zelensky brought up the funding first? BZZT wrongo), I don't think you actually read it. Edited September 26, 2019 by John Adams
B-Man Posted September 26, 2019 Posted September 26, 2019 4 minutes ago, John Adams said: Do you take the position that Rudy Giuliani is a stable guy you'd like defending POTUS under oath. No, but that was an add-on to your statement, as I'm sure you know The rest are true. (NO.................they are partially true, just enough to try and hide behind) Did Trump say he withheld the aid? Answer is YES. Are you shitting me? He asked about the Bidens by name! Based on how wrong you've been about the "transcript" in the last few days (Remember saying Zelensky brought up the funding first? BZZT wrongo), I don't think you actually read it. Also you continue to evade the point. Trump asked them to look into 2016 corruption. Biden's name came up AFTER. I'd say you're bad at this, but you have obviously already had too much to drink. . . 1
Recommended Posts