Nanker Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: For clarity as to who's who in that picture: Note, this is a picture of people vacationing together. Friends. The picture shared by Gary/Ben in the Russia thread of Trump/Nadler is one anyone can get with Trump at his events during the 2016 election. One is not like the other. The relationship between Trump/Nadler is non existent whereas the relationship between Bill and Nadler goes back decades. Be careful of programmed NPCs thinking they know what they're talking about. And, per the Mueller report, Nadler was working with both campaigns: Someone is being pressured to flip. For clarity and the record, that is NOT my boat in the background! 3
Deranged Rhino Posted June 3, 2019 Author Posted June 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Nanker said: For clarity and the record, that is NOT my boat in the background!
Foxx Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: For clarity as to who's who in that picture: Note, this is a picture of people vacationing together. Friends. The picture shared by Gary/Ben in the Russia thread of Trump/Nadler is one anyone can get with Trump at his events during the 2016 election. One is not like the other. The relationship between Trump/Nadler is non existent whereas the relationship between Bill and Nadler goes back decades. Be careful of programmed NPCs thinking they know what they're talking about. And, per the Mueller report, Nadler was working with both campaigns: Someone is being pressured to flip. is that a typo in the report? or are they talking about Ralph Nader? of course you meant Nader. Edited June 3, 2019 by Foxx
Foxx Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: Uh-oh ... that tweet has been removed and this one has been inserted in it's place: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1135655190592393216 seems he has a history. previously convicted in 2003 https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/1068184494979538944 Edited June 3, 2019 by Foxx 1
Deranged Rhino Posted June 3, 2019 Author Posted June 3, 2019 6 minutes ago, Foxx said: that tweet has been removed and this one has been inserted in it's place: https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1135655190592393216 seems he has a history. previously convicted in 2003 https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/1068184494979538944 What's interesting to me is he was indicted and under seal (possibly) while testifying to the SCO. 1 1
Foxx Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 4 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Game on. Twitter is shitting their pants at this news as well. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1135661104623828992 1
Koko78 Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 12 minutes ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1135661104623828992 Nadler trying to muddy the waters and play defense against the FTC?
3rdnlng Posted June 3, 2019 Posted June 3, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Uh-oh Direct ties to Bill Clinton: A pod of sperm whales was spotted in shallow water off Jeffrey Epstein's island nicknamed "***** Island". 1 1
snafu Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 7 hours ago, GG said: Regulators don't know what to do either. In all these cases they will look to past examples, which obviously won't fit in the Internet age landscape. My guess is that they will put in some kind of a Chinese wall between the social network plumbing and the advertising & sales departments. Leave them alone, I say. If people don’t know what they’re getting into by this time, that’s their own fault. Off the top of my head maybe the best example is how big tobacco was treated. People still smoke. Maybe the FTC should go through the process to shed sunlight on their operations a bit, but that’s about it. Even then, that’s going pretty far.
GG Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 10 hours ago, snafu said: Leave them alone, I say. If people don’t know what they’re getting into by this time, that’s their own fault. Off the top of my head maybe the best example is how big tobacco was treated. People still smoke. Maybe the FTC should go through the process to shed sunlight on their operations a bit, but that’s about it. Even then, that’s going pretty far. I'm torn on this because it's taking anti-trust into uncharted territories. My standard for enforcing anti-trust is when there's clear consumer harm. There are many valid cases for natural monopolies to exist, and as long as the companies don't abuse their monopoly status, they should be left alone. The major techs aren't like traditional industrials, because consumers do benefit in direct transactions from their large size. You wouldn't get free 2-day shipping if Amazon is broken up. How would you benefit if there were two Facebooks doing the exact thing? My focus wouldn't be on anti-trust grounds but on corporate behavior. How are the companies using the vast personal data that they collect? Are they allowed to sell all of it? Are the TOS clear and do the companies skirt the TOS to drive more revenues. My guess on these questions is that do not behave ethically and are probably breaking some privacy laws. If needed, new laws should be considered because we never had situations where 3rd parties had access to mountains of personal data that individuals did not know were given up or permitted through small print. If banks engaged in this behavior, there'd be rightful indignation and multiple hearings leading to sanctions. The techs somehow get away with providing far less disclosures in their financial filings than most industries they now compete with. That's where my focus would be. Don't break them up, but air out their financials. 1 1
Keukasmallies Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 Do the bubbles coming to the surface in the pic of the five guys indicate that Hill'ry is there too?
B-Man Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Hmmmm, right as our President is in Great Britain.....................................Coincidence ? . 5
Buffalo_Gal Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 1 minute ago, B-Man said: Hmmmm, right as our President is in Great Britain.....................................Coincidence ? . Yup, of course, merely a coincidence. ? Now let's see if the guy lies, or is at least semi-honest. 2
Foxx Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 5 hours ago, Buffalo_Gal said: there was just a collective shitting of pants. 3
Hedge Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 More than $267m (£210m) belonging to a former Nigerian dictator has been seized from a Jersey bank account. 4
DC Tom Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hedge said: More than $267m (£210m) belonging to a former Nigerian dictator has been seized from a Jersey bank account. $10m of that is mine. I have the emails to prove it. 4 1
/dev/null Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 12 minutes ago, Hedge said: More than $267m (£210m) belonging to a former Nigerian dictator has been seized from a Jersey bank account. wait what no! that nigerian dude still owes me for helping him with saddam's gold! 1
Bray Wyatt Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 on a discord server I am a part of, theres a nigerian guy and he had nothing but bad things to say about this dude.
3rdnlng Posted June 4, 2019 Posted June 4, 2019 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: $10m of that is mine. I have the emails to prove it. Send me your account numbers and pin and I'll get you the money promptly! 1
Recommended Posts