Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123963147574968323 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 minute ago, Foxx said: https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123963147574968323 Creepy story if true. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 you just can't make this ***** up. https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1123769459016118274 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Creepy story if true. Better hope no one on that plane had a phone... (I've heard, long before Q mentioned it, that there is a recording of the conversation lifted from the cell phones. It's supposed to be damning: a quid pro quo offer was made, the meeting was planned by her USSS so it wasn't spontaneous as she and Bill claim) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 Just now, Deranged Rhino said: Better hope no one on that plane had a phone... (I've heard, long before Q mentioned it, that there is a recording of the conversation lifted from the cell phones. It's supposed to be damning: a quid pro quo offer was made, the meeting was planned by her USSS so it wasn't spontaneous as she and Bill claim) Whoa if true. I didn't think they had anything on Bill at all, but of there is a recording... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Whoa if true. I didn't think they had anything on Bill at all, but of there is a recording... Exactly, the "if true" is an important grain of salt. I have heard this one so long, without confirmation, that it's one of the elements of the coup plot which I've just set aside and kind of ignored because I can't verify it. But I have to believe if there is a recording, we'll get it at some point this summer based on everything else being rolled out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 I know this story is in multiple threads here, but I thought this one was best for this conversation. Azra Turk is not FBI -- that's not speculation. If she were FBI, she would not have been inserted into a cold recruitment scenario without an official cover. That's something intelligence officers do, people who recruit spies and work as their handlers. P-Dop claims she's CIA but my sources disagree (and have issues with P-Dop). Per their speculation (and that's what it is) she's much more likely to be a foreign intelligence officer for the Turks -- who is NATO but not 5-Eye. This was a 5-Eye op, not a NATO op which brings the people I've been speaking with to the speculation that she was tapped by the Brits who used a Turkish officer to build another firewall. Something to consider. I'm sure we'll be learning more soon on this based on the conversations I've been having today. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 I was curious why Preet said (last month) that he may have let his emotions get the better of him after the election. (paraphrasing) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 sorry Donner's, you just stuck out for what seems like the nineteenth million time. will you ever learn? https://twitter.com/kyledcheney/status/1123955389370748928 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foxx Posted May 2, 2019 Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 hour ago, Foxx said: ladies and gentlemen... your esteemed representative. https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1123717349729763330 https://twitter.com/esaagar/status/1123956417759563776 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 2, 2019 Author Share Posted May 2, 2019 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 AG Barr gets attacked because his probe endangers powerful people Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel Original Article . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, B-Man said: AG Barr gets attacked because his probe endangers powerful people Wall Street Journal, by Kimberley A. Strassel Original Article . I recommend that @plenzmd1 read this piece 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 23 minutes ago, GG said: I recommend that @plenzmd1 read this piece Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Awww don't chase him off. I think he has potential. He's still #OrangeManBad but he is willing to engage, and not stupidly (ala Tibs, that BigM guy, etc). And goodness knows "the other side" needs another voice down here. Doc Brown can't be all alone. Edited May 3, 2019 by Buffalo_Gal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said: Why? He's only explaining to us what other people think, not what he believes personally. Of course he doesn't claim that until he sees he's losing the argument. -) Tell where I have said i don't believe Barr did not lie about this letter. What I have said is it is not a hill I would die on, as the Dems seem like they want to do. I know you consistently have reading comprehension problems but go through every statement I have made on Barrs testimony and tell where it deviated from what I am stating here. Edited May 3, 2019 by plenzmd1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 45 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: Awww don't chase him off. I think he has potential. He's still #OrangeManBad but he is willing to engage, and not stupidly (ala Tibs, that BigM guy, etc). And goodness knows "the other side" needs another voice down here. Doc Brown can't be all alone. I don't want to run him off. If he can't deal with being called out for hiding from his own opinions then he'll be leaving on his own volition. The last thing I want to do is spend a bunch of time debating someone on the issues, and then have them essentially claim that they were just trying to explain to us what someone else's position is/was. I actually think he might be coming around in some respects because he appears to be doubting some of what he's always thought was true. I agree, he has potential. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 11 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said: Tell where I have said i don't believe Barr did not lie about this letter. What I have said is it is not a hill I would die on, as the Dems seem like they want to do. I know you consistently have reading comprehension problems but go through every statement I have made on Barrs testimony and tell where it deviated from what I am stating here. I used to call a certain poster here "Yesbut" because of his proclivity to equivocate. Don't be a "Yesbut". Up thread I quoted you and I have not yet received an answer. My response made it clear that Barr did not lie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted May 3, 2019 Share Posted May 3, 2019 Just now, 3rdnlng said: I used to call a certain poster here "Yesbut" because of his proclivity to equivocate. Don't be a "Yesbut". Up thread I quoted you and I have not yet received an answer. My response made it clear that Barr did not lie. and i have replied to you somewhere..please answer the question above with quotes from where i said i dont believe he lied,, ya cant. Don't know how many times I have said it, that you refuse to understand..it is not a hill I would die on. But you like to only read what you THINK someone said, so go on your merry way and please don't use any kind of thinking/reading skills that may get in the way of your pre conceived notions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 3, 2019 Author Share Posted May 3, 2019 19 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: I know this story is in multiple threads here, but I thought this one was best for this conversation. Azra Turk is not FBI -- that's not speculation. If she were FBI, she would not have been inserted into a cold recruitment scenario without an official cover. That's something intelligence officers do, people who recruit spies and work as their handlers. P-Dop claims she's CIA but my sources disagree (and have issues with P-Dop). Per their speculation (and that's what it is) she's much more likely to be a foreign intelligence officer for the Turks -- who is NATO but not 5-Eye. This was a 5-Eye op, not a NATO op which brings the people I've been speaking with to the speculation that she was tapped by the Brits who used a Turkish officer to build another firewall. Something to consider. I'm sure we'll be learning more soon on this based on the conversations I've been having today. Brennan>>>Dearlove/MI6>>>>Turkey>>>>Azra 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts