Deranged Rhino Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Belied by the very fact that she had a conference call with House Democrats alone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 Important... Bill Binney is a man to listen to when he speaks on matters relating to the NSA. It appears there were communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. These communications are classified Top Secret. Just a random "low level staffer" who was randomly murdered in a bungled robbery, yet his communications with Assange are deemed Top Secret. Puzzle that one out. This could get really interesting. https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b “But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET. If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.” (SNIP Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago. In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request. Here’s what Binney says: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Important... Bill Binney is a man to listen to when he speaks on matters relating to the NSA. It appears there were communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. These communications are classified Top Secret. Just a random "low level staffer" who was randomly murdered in a bungled robbery, yet his communications with Assange are deemed Top Secret. Puzzle that one out. This could get really interesting. https://medium.com/@markfmccarty/bill-binney-states-that-the-nsa-has-32-pages-of-communications-between-seth-rich-and-julian-54a2df5a0e5b “But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that: Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET. If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.” (SNIP Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago. In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request. Here’s what Binney says: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” They could very likely be classified because of the means of collection, not the content. But that they exist at all is troubling. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 49 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: “Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange. And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them. That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.” Helps explain the charges (or lack thereof) against Assange... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 . 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 guilty of being awesome and winning every single day as President Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 Quote A Pearson spokesperson defended the textbook pointing out the book underwent “rigorous peer review to ensure academic integrity.” Yep, that would be part of the problem. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 good thing most kids give less than a rat's ass about what's in a textbook 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 (edited) It's all going to come out... If Clinton and Obama had taken the olive branch which Trump offered after the election, they wouldn't be in the position they're in now: absolutely *****ked. Correct. It was a pay-for-play operation, selling out the country to support their own ideologies (Obama) or to line their own pocketbooks (Clinton). (More/Thread) Edited April 23, 2019 by Deranged Rhino 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 ... I don't know what to make of this yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: It's all going to come out... If Clinton and Obama had taken the olive branch which Trump offered after the election, they wouldn't be in the position they're in now: absolutely *****ked. Correct. It was a pay-for-play operation, selling out the country to support their own ideologies (Obama) or to line their own pocketbooks (Clinton). The early word on her home-brewed server was so she could do an end-around Obama. That never made sense, and now we know why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo_Gal Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ... I don't know what to make of this yet. OMG the replies. Some of them made me laugh out loud. Assuming this is on the up-and-up... From the article:"Hezbollah generates about a billion dollars a year from a combination of direct financial support from Iran, international businesses and investments, donor networks, and money laundering activities," according to information provided by the State Department. Since money talks, this is just another avenue to shut down Islamic Terrorism? Do you think they'll really turn on their own for any amount? "Information"? Or something else? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 13 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said: OMG the replies. Some of them made me laugh out loud. Assuming this is on the up-and-up... From the article:"Hezbollah generates about a billion dollars a year from a combination of direct financial support from Iran, international businesses and investments, donor networks, and money laundering activities," according to information provided by the State Department. Since money talks, this is just another avenue to shut down Islamic Terrorism? Do you think they'll really turn on their own for any amount? "Information"? Or something else? Everything I'm hearing from people who would know, the regime is on its last legs. They depended upon the waiver system for their oil sales - with that gone, they're pretty much sunk. When the money dries up, the goons you hire to keep your power tend to look for new revenue streams -- this could be a lucrative one for some of the lower level people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 23, 2019 Author Share Posted April 23, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 23, 2019 Share Posted April 23, 2019 5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Wampum Walter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts