njbuff Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 Interesting that Trump said Democrats were laughing at their stance on Trump behind the scenes. Disgraceful pricks these Dumbs are. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 Re all the above: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-vows-to-release-fisa-docs-now-that-mueller-probe-is-concluded-slams-treasonous-fbi 1
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 Bring it. We in the light have waited too long for real justice.
/dev/null Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 8 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: This was Trump on Hannity - the kids = the coup plotters: Tucker or Hannity should have put together a montage of all the talking heads predicting the Mueller Report would force Trump to resign with the background music 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 (Booms are back) https://sacramento.cbslocal.com/video/4054314-neighbors-left-puzzled-by-mysterious-loud-boom-in-fair-oaks/
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 This was @GG's point/theory over two years ago: Good call then, good call now (for some of the info in the dossier) 1
Kevbeau Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: This was @GG's point/theory over two years ago: Good call then, good call now (for some of the info in the dossier) Wait....so we’re back to blaming the Russians? Asking for a friend. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 Just now, Kevbeau said: Wait....so we’re back to blaming the Russians? Asking for a friend. This is always what has added to the fog of war of this whole ordeal. Russia was meddling and had/has an interest in sowing chaos on both sides. The first several memos of the Steele dossier were created and authored without Russian help (that's what Nellie Ohr did, using pilfered 702 data). But the later memos, many of which were done in the final months (even after) the election were compiled after everyone in DC and the media knew Steele was looking for Russian dirt on Trump. No question Putin and company added to that information. Steele never talked directly to sources (which is why he's not a "source"), he relied on second hand hearsay. The Russian could easily insert some crazy stuff to his sources, knowing he'd write it up. That's why the charge of HRC's campaign paying Steele to collude/conspire with Russians is solid and will come back to bite her. 1
GG Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 7 minutes ago, Kevbeau said: Wait....so we’re back to blaming the Russians? Asking for a friend. Always have. The difference is that there was no Trump & Co. involvement. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 They were always going to dump it all on your lap, John.
Tiberius Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 On 4/19/2017 at 12:04 PM, TPS said: My view of the DS, as I posted earlier, the Eisenhower view of the military industrial complex. We always need an enemy to justify the $600+ billion spent annually. It's Orwell's 1984, "there will always be war in Eurasia." I've seen estimates that the ME wars have cost us $5 trillion to date. One man's cost is another's revenue. In this view, there is no end game other than perpetual fear and war. At times, various interests coalesce, and the Iraq war is one case. The so-called Neocons produced "the project for a new American century" document in 1997, which outlined regime change in Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Iran. The Neocons used 911 as an opportunity to begin. Destabilizing the ME via regime change would also benefit the MIC, Israel, and other US business interest like the oil companies. The concept of the Deep State suggests that the elements aligned behind this policy are more powerful than any political party, which is evidenced by the fact that regime change has continued regardless of who is in power. Which brings us to Trump, who was critical of regime change policies, but is now on board after the alleged chemical attack by Assad, who had absolutely nothing to gain from the attack. Russia is also being pushed again as evil incarnate; how else are we going to justify the need to upgrade our nuclear arsenal? My answer, again, to your question: there is no end game; there will always be an enemy. Isn't this like saying the police are a deep state? Obviously there are always going to be threats to Democratic nations as long as dictatorships exist. The country's that don't let their people have a voice in government see our system as a threat. That's why Putin hated Hillary, the same Hillary who watched laughing as Quadaffi was being beaten to death. That's a big reason Russia wants NATO broken up, is pushing BREXIT and secession propaganda in Texas.
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 This is called irony: (the comment, not the schif video) ****************************** Still working to confirm this - so grain of salt for now. But if this is true, then we're really going to see some fireworks. 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 (not really breaking - but publicly breaking) ***************** Remember Nellie Ohr and the HAM radio license? That's back, as she lied to Congress about it: 1 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 Another thing to consider re Trump's Hannity interview last night: Trump lit a fire under the butts of a whole slew of conspirators last night. Most of which are under active surveillance. What happens when you light a fire? The rats scurry. They make mistakes. They reach out for help and instructions. And in the process are generating tons of SIGINT and HUMINT which are being scooped up by the CI team. Especially for those with their security clearances revoked - they're all out on their own, with no way to safely communicate with their team. This is an intelligence bonanza right now. 2
DC Tom Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: Trump just said Schiff committed a crime in an interview on Hannity. (And it's correct, Schiff is on the Gang of 8, he knew more than others what evidence there was - and wasn't - on the issue and lied anyway in an attempt to overthrow the president) I doubt Trump understands the law well enough to make that statement. He really should just shut up. If he were smart, he'd leave it at "We'll let the fine people at the DoJ look into it. Fine people, I'm sure they'll do well." His bold, declarative statement just makes him look like an idiot. 57 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: ****************************** Still working to confirm this - so grain of salt for now. But if this is true, then we're really going to see some fireworks. It's going to be hilarious watching Democrats twist themselves in knots trying to excuse this while still condemning Manafort. 2
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 Ohr transcript (forget if it was previously linked) 1
Deranged Rhino Posted March 28, 2019 Author Posted March 28, 2019 http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter115&edition=prelim
keepthefaith Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 42 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: Ohr transcript (forget if it was previously linked) Well there certainly is an awful lot she can't recall and she wasn't at all curious about the purpose of her own work. 1
Tiberius Posted March 28, 2019 Posted March 28, 2019 2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: This is always what has added to the fog of war of this whole ordeal. Russia was meddling and had/has an interest in sowing chaos on both sides. The first several memos of the Steele dossier were created and authored without Russian help (that's what Nellie Ohr did, using pilfered 702 data). But the later memos, many of which were done in the final months (even after) the election were compiled after everyone in DC and the media knew Steele was looking for Russian dirt on Trump. No question Putin and company added to that information. Steele never talked directly to sources (which is why he's not a "source"), he relied on second hand hearsay. The Russian could easily insert some crazy stuff to his sources, knowing he'd write it up. That's why the charge of HRC's campaign paying Steele to collude/conspire with Russians is solid and will come back to bite her. Ya, Putin wanted Trump to win and helped him.
Recommended Posts