Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, 4merper4mer said:

Nothing will happen to any real insider ever.  The only possible exception is if it is done to protect someone higher on the food chain, but even that is unlikely.

 

Think of a company that is a monopoly but also gets to make all the real rules while ignoring the written rules.  

That is all that will happen, nothing.

 

what this will do is allow the government to say we need to have more laws to protect this from happening again. The government will use this to extend its reach and invade our lives under the guise of protection from foreign interests and our own. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

There is no way that Hillary does not have a Fall Guy

Fall person. Women can be set up, targeted and killed in a random robbery where nothing is taken just like a man can.

 

It's 2018, you knuckle dragging neandrathal. 

Posted
55 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Fall person. Women can be set up, targeted and killed in a random robbery where nothing is taken just like a man can.

 

It's 2018, you knuckle dragging neandrathal. 

I don't know many random acts like that happen in the kitchen, though.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

And she could just hit him with a frying pan or use her apron to strangle him.

You're suggesting the old criss-cross? She's the target, but ends up killing him?  That actually sounds like empowerment. Now I don't know what to think . 

Posted
57 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

You're suggesting the old criss-cross? She's the target, but ends up killing him?  That actually sounds like empowerment. Now I don't know what to think . 

It ain't empowerment, nah. It's making sure her man has a Manhattan and a steak when he gets home. She ain't got no time for no nonsense. And she gotta do all that barefoot.

Posted
3 hours ago, Boyst62 said:

I don't know many random acts like that happen in the kitchen, though.  

You obviously never saw “The Postman Always Rings Twice.”

Posted

Are the Investigations the Cover-Up?

 

Those of us who have been paying attention know that serious crimes were committed at the highest levels of government in an attempt to exonerate Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump.  There was collusion between government agencies, including collusion with foreign agents, to illegally influence the 2016 Presidential election.  There is enough evidence on the table to be confident of these claims.

 

And those of us who care about rule of law, who want to see justice done to the criminals in this conspiracy, have been waiting for years to see that happen.  We hear that these serious matters are being investigated.  We hear that there are whistleblowers inside the government who want to come forward and expose the corruption.  We hear that there are many, many more documents which will substantiate our worst fears about one of the greatest scandals in the history of our country.

 

We have been assured that there are several investigations looking into the various aspect of this abuse of power.  Inspector General Michael Horowitz, prosecutor John Huber, and others are looking into the corruption.  Mueller is supposedly tasked with exposing foreign influence on the Presidential election.

 

But what if the ‘investigations’ are really the cover-up? What if the investigations are carefully structured to protect criminal actions rather than expose them? What if the investigations are actually being used to hide evidence from the citizenry?



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/12/are_the_investigations_the_coverup.html#ixzz5ao6hohi2 

  • Like (+1) 5
×
×
  • Create New...